1 / 18

Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary

Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary .

leann
Download Presentation

Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility StudyCurrent Conditions Summary

  2. Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement-Component of Russian River Instream Flow and Restoration (Biological Opinion)- Habitat enhancement for coho salmon and steelhead trout- Opportunity: abundant cool water in late summer

  3. Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study-Two Study Phases1) Inventory of Current Conditions▪ Watershed Characteristics/History▪ Stream Geomorphology Today▪ Fish Habitat 2) Feasibility Analysis and Conceptual Design

  4. Watershed Characteristics-217 sq. mi. (130 sq. mi. upstream of Warm Springs Dam)- Largest tributary to Russian River based on annual runoff- Creek flow pattern pre-Warm Springs Dam ▪ Typical of Mediterranean Climate ▪ High floods resulting from winter rainstorms ▪ Very low flow (dry in many years) in summer

  5. Watershed History1850s: Valley settled▪ 40% of forested acres cleared 1850-1870 ▪ Increased runoff and sediment to lower valley ▪ These actions initially raised creek bed (3’) ▪ Vegetation recovery resulted in creek bed lowering by turn of century (4’) 1900 – 1970s: Gravel mining in Russian River 1950s -1970s: Gravel mining in Dry Creek near Westside Br. 1952: Healdsburg Dam 1959: Coyote Dam▪ Combined influences resulted in additional creek bed lowering by (10’) ▪ Lowering of stream propagated up Dry Creek tributaries ▪ Effects slowed by mid-1980s

  6. Watershed History Creek changes 1850 -1980s Vineyard level 1850 Vineyard level Vineyard level Pre dam conditions

  7. Watershed History Creek changes 1984 – Today1984: Closure of Warm Springs Dam▪ flow patterns ▪ sediment patterns ▪ vegetation patterns

  8. Stream Geomorphology TodayFlow patterns:▪ reduced winter floods ▪ higher summer flowsSediment patterns:▪ cut off upper 60% of watershed ▪ moderated by supply from Pena, Dutcher, Crane, Mill Creeks

  9. Stream Geomorphology TodayVegetation patterns:▪ combination of reduced winter floods and high summer flows resulted in extensive riparian growth ▪ stabilizes gravel bars ▪ focuses flow in channel

  10. Fish HabitatInventory of 13.9 miles between WS dam and Russian River:▪ Pools ▪ Riffles ▪ Glides ▪ Alcove and edge habitat

  11. Fish HabitatInventory of 13.9 miles between WS dam and Russian River: ▪ Measured depths, widths, areas, cover, complexity, creek bed material, woody material▪ Created maps for each segment of study reach (16 sub-reaches)

  12. Fish HabitatSelected Results (substrate and woody material):▪ Riffles had 80% of their gravels in target range for spawning ▪ Fine sediment in riffles low (<10%) ▪ Average of 209 pieces of woody debris per mile (pools, scour pools) ▪ 46% of woody debris pieces were living ▪ Alcoves most prevalent in lower half of study reach ▪ Edge habitat slightly more prevalent in lower half ▪ Overall habitat quality less than ideal, e.g., velocity

  13. Opportunities for Fish Habitat EnhancementAreas of interest for potential habitat enhancement identified ▪ Abundant opportunities for enhancement of pools, riffles, stream banks and creation of off-channel habitats ▪ All areas of interest within historic channel

  14. Opportunities for Fish Habitat EnhancementPotential enhancement applications ▪ Riffles – supplement gravel to increase area ▪ Pools – add/re-arrange woody materials to increase cover and complexity

  15. Opportunities for Fish Habitat EnhancementPotential enhancement applications▪ Off-channel and alcove habitat creation Before After After

  16. Opportunities for Fish Habitat EnhancementPotential enhancement applications ▪ Stream banks – stabilization to enhance cover and complexity Dry Creek After Before

  17. Next StepsDetailed Feasibility Analysis and Concept Designs ▪ System-scale feasibility ▪ Project-scale feasibilityUpcoming Schedule ▪ Spring – summer 2010: Detailed feasibility analysis ▪ Fall 2010: Concept designs and ranking of opportunities ▪ Summer 2011: Pilot project implementation

  18. Questions?Dry CreekFish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility StudyCurrent Conditions Summary

More Related