310 likes | 604 Views
Frequency of Tetracycline Resistance Genes in Bacterial Genomic DNA of Swine Feces. Sharise Redmond & Jeannette Nguyen Under the Direction of Candace Glendening. Antibiotics. ABX Agents made by bacteria/mold to inhibit bacterial growth Do NOT kill viruses Use
E N D
Frequency of Tetracycline Resistance Genes in Bacterial Genomic DNA of Swine Feces Sharise Redmond & Jeannette Nguyen Under the Direction of Candace Glendening
Antibiotics • ABX • Agents made by bacteria/mold to inhibit bacterial growth • Do NOT kill viruses • Use • treat infections in humans and animals • growth promotion in animals • Bacteria • Pathogenic - harmful/disease causing • e.g. Salmonella, Escheria coli O157:H7 • Beneficial – non harmful • Commensal - symbiotic relationship which benefits one species while the other is unaffected • lots of commensal bacteria in gut (E. coli spp.)
History of Antibiotics • 1800’s:“germ theory” • Began search for ABX • 1929:Fleming discovered Penicillin • 1942 1st large scale use of Penicillin • Used largely during WWII • 1946: Penicillin widely available clinically • Obtainable OTC by the public until the mid ‘50s • Dev’t of more ABX over next few decades • 1970’s: Antibiotic Resistance (AR) recognized as a real threat • Meningitis & gonorrhea strains resistant to penicillin
AB Resistance • Bacteria’s ability to produce a protein that: • disables an ABX or • prevents transport of the ABX into the cell • Main hypothesis of AR: Genetic mutations + antibiotics in environment = antibiotic resistance • N. gonorrhoeae (gonorrhea)resistance: penicillin tetracycline SOON cephalosporins flouroquinolones
ABX Use in Animals Does the use growth promotional levels of ABX in food animals lead to AR bacteria in our food? • Therapeutic – treatment of bacterial infection • Sub-therapeutic levels – prevention of disease & growth promotion • Antibiotics used for growth promotion pigs gain weight: • 3.3-8.8% increased weight • 2.5-7.0% feed efficiency • Food Research Institute, Doyle, 1998 • ABX use by farmers is not regulated • ~25 million pounds annually used
History of Tetracycline • 1948: introduction of tetracycline • Made by Streptomyces bacterium in soil • Chemical structure: • “broad spectrum” • low toxicity • 1953: Shigella dysenteriae dev. resistance to tetracycline • Today 2nd to penicillin in the world in production and use • Treat: Respiratory tract infections, typhus, cholera, brucellosis, anthrax, syphilis, Chlamydia, acne • Also used widely for growth promotion in animals.
Tet Mechanisms of Action • Tetracycline inhibits bacterial growth by inhibiting translation. • It binds to the ribosomal subunit and prevents the amino-acyl tRNA from binding to the A site of the ribosome. Inhibition of Protein Synthesis by Tetracycline
Tetracycline Efflux Pump Inactivation Enzyme plasmid Mechanisms of Tet Resistance Ribosomal Protection Protein
Growth Promotion • There has been a lack of serious studies in the amounts of antibiotics given to livestock and its link to the increasing rates of resistance genes.
Central Question • Does the use of tetracycline as a growth promotant affect tetracycline resistance in swine fecal flora? Central Hypothesis • The use of tetracycline as a growth promotant will frequency of detecting Tet Resistance Genes in swine fecal flora.
Effects of Growth Promotional use of Chlorotetracycline (CTC) • Large-scale, multi-year study led by Julie Funk @ Ohio State Univ. (OSU) • Epidemiological approach to studying the use of CTC as a growth promotant for swine • Looked for AR bacteria
CDC Year 1 Study Design Temporally matched Barn Pair Control (no antibiotics in the feed) Treatment (50g CTC/ton of feed) • Treatment from 10 weeks (50 lbs) until 6 months old (250 lbs). • Pigs sampled pre-slaughter • 14 barn pairs total • 96 pigs per barn • 2688 total pigs sampled
Isolated 100 different Gram Negative bacteria (usually E. coli) from each fecal sample Studied resistance to 4 antibiotics Found phenotypic (tet res) difference between these 2 groups Selected CDC Year 1 Results Gram Negative Fecal Flora Isolates 1.0 .90 .80 .70 .60 Proportion Resistant to CTC .50 .40 .30 .20 .10 0 No CTC CTC Treatment n=268,800 isolates
Objectives • To study the distribution of tetracycline resistance genes found in the fecal flora of pigs • + CTC diet in their finishing phase. • Ctrl: NO growth promotional use of ABX • Our Study Population • 10 barn pairs • 48 pigs per barn • 480 total pigs sampled • Recall there are at least 38 tet resistance genes • Are certain genes found more often under the selective pressure of tetracycline?
200 mg poop (frozen quickly) Qiagen Stool DNA Extraction Kit (Bacterial Genomic DNA) 200 l genomic DNA (from bacterial population) 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l Multiplex PCR Group 1 Group 3 Group 2 Group 4 ExperimentalDesign
E-gel Marker Methods: Multiplex PCR • 2 (or more) sets of primers in same tube • Ex: Group 1: • tet(B) 659 bp • tet(C) 418 bp • tet(D) 787 bp • Run each sample through four separate Multiplex PCR reactions. 480 samples x 4 groups = 1920 rxns! B C D B/C/D 2000 800 400 200 100 Ng et al., 2001
667 515 406 267 169 Sample Gel (Group 3) (+) Controls _ Individual Pigs from Farm Bailey 3 _ K L M O S (-) Individual Pigs from Farm Bailey 3 _
Sample Gel (Group 4) (+) Controls Individual Pigs from Farm Bailey 3 _ _ ? Q X (-) 904 468 ___ _ Individual Pigs from Farm Bailey 3 _______
Results .3 .33 .49 5 E-10 1 E-4
Results 6 E-4 2 E-5 3 E-7
Results .008 .03 3 E-7
81% 81% .94 Central Hypothesis • The use of tetracycline as a growth promotant will frequency of detecting Tet Resistance Genes in swine fecal flora.
Discussion • At least one tet res gene in 81% of both treatment groups • 5/8 tet res genes showed no statistical diff. btw treatment groups or were not high in frequency • tet(C), (L), (M) similar high frequency in both swine groups • tet(B), (D), (K) min. to 0 frequency in both swine groups • tet(S) mostly found in ctrl samples • tet(O) mostly found in CTC samples • Group 4 AR genes in both treatment groups • 3/3 tet res genes statistically diff. btw treatment groups • Most tet genes found in CTC groups • Group 2 data in progress
Future Work • Complete sample processing • 4 more barn pairs • Look at more tet resistance genes • Try to quantitate the amount of each tet gene present in the sample
References • Aminov, R. I.; Chee-Sanford, J. C.; Garrigues, N.; Teferedegne, B.; Krapac, I. J.;. White, B. A.; Mackie, R. I. (2002) Development, Validation, and Application of PCR Primers for Detection of Tetracycline Efflux Genes of Gram-Negative Bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(4), 1786-1793. • Aminov, R. I; Garrigues-Jean, N; Mackie, R. I. (2000) Molecular Ecology of Tetracycline Resistance: Development and Validation of Primers for Detection of Tetracycline Resistance Genes Encoding Ribosomal Protection Proteins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67 (1), 22-32. • Billington, S. J.; Songer, J. G.; Jost, B. H. (2002) Widespread Distribution of a Tet W Determinant among Tetracycline-Resistant Isolates of the Animal Pathogen Acranobacterium pyogenes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1281-1287. • Bryan, A.; Shapir, N.; Sadowsky, M.J. (2004) Frequency and Distribution of Tetracycline Resistance Genes in Genetically Diverse, Nonselected, and Nonclinical Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Diverse Human and Animal Sources • Chee-Sanford, J. C.; Aminov, R. I.; Krapac, I. J.; Garrigues-JeanJean, N.; Mackie, R. I. (2001) Occurrence and Diversity of Tetracycline Resistance Genes in Lagoons and Groundwater Underlying Two Swine Production Facilities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(4), 1494-1502. • Chopra, I.; Roberts, M. (2001) Tetracycline Antibiotics: Mode of Action, Applications, Molecular Biology, and Epidemiology of Bacterial Resistance. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 65(2), 232-260. • Doyle, M. E. (2001) Alternatives to Antibiotic Use for Growth Promotion in Animal Husbandry. Food Research Institute: Briefings, University of Wisconsin-Madison 1-17. • Gevers, D.; Danielsen, M.; Huys, G.; Swings, J. (2002) Molecular Characterization of tet(M) Genes in Lactobacillus Isolates from Different Types of Fermented Dry Sausage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(2), 1270-1275. • http://dictionary.reference.com • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetracycline • Lefers, Mark and Holmgren Lab (2004) http://www.biochem.northwestern.edu/holmgren/Glossary/Definitions/Def-A/antibiotic_resistance.html • Levy, M.D., Stuart B. (2002). The Antibiotic Paradox. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing • Mathews, K. H. (2001) Antibiotic Drug Use and Veterinary Costs in U.S. Livestock Production. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin 766. • Ng, L.-K.; Martin, I.; Alfa, M.; Mulvey, M. (2001) Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 15, 209-215. • Rubkin, Roberts, Institute of Medicine (1998) Antimicrobial Resistance: Issues and Options. Washington, DC: Harrison, P. R. and Lederberg, J. National Academy Press. • Villedieu, A.; Diaz-Torres, M. L.; Hunt, N.; McNab, R.; Spratt, D. A.; Wilson, M.; Mullany, P. (2002) Prevalence of Tetracycline Resistance Genes in Oral Bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 47(3), 878-882. • White, D.G.; Zhao, S.; Simjee, S.; Wagner, D. D.; McDermott, P. F. (2002)Antimicrobial resistance of foodborne pathogens. Microbes and Infection 4, 405-412.
Acknowledgements: • Grant!!! • Julie Funk, MS, DVM, PhD, Asst. Prof. @ OSU School of Veterinary Medicine • Fecal Extraction Team • Andy Bowman • Luc Hesselschwardt • Andy Mack • Jodi Houser • Jamie Berning • Candace Glendening • Each Other • University of Redlands