1 / 30

Teff Grass as a Warm Season Forage for Backgrounding Calves in the Shenandoah Valley

Teff Grass as a Warm Season Forage for Backgrounding Calves in the Shenandoah Valley. Brian Jones – Agronomy Jason Carter – Animal Science. Background. Teff is a warm season C4 annual grass African origin, used as a grain crop Gaining popularity as a summer annual forage

lee-gregory
Download Presentation

Teff Grass as a Warm Season Forage for Backgrounding Calves in the Shenandoah Valley

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Teff Grass as a Warm Season Forage for Backgrounding Calves in the Shenandoah Valley Brian Jones – Agronomy Jason Carter – Animal Science

  2. Background • Teff is a warm season C4 annual grass • African origin, used as a grain crop • Gaining popularity as a summer annual forage • Primarily marketed as high quality horse hay

  3. The Teff plant

  4. Objective To compare the weight gain and profitability of calves rotationally grazing a Teff grass forage system to calves continuously grazing a typical Shenandoah Valley cool season pasture

  5. Establishment • Seeded following barley (wrapped haylage) • May 23: Turbo-till • May 25: Pasture harrow • May 31: Fertilizer • 64 lb 0-0-62.5 • 83 lb 10-34-0 • 52 lb 30% UAN • May 31: Herbicide • 1.5 qt/A Gramoxone

  6. Establishment • Seeded June 3 • 7 lbs/A • “Tiffany” teff • Coated seed • 1.3 million seeds/lb

  7. Establishment • Brillion seeder • Must seed no deeper than ¼”

  8. First Cutting July 10 • 37 Days after planting • Analysis: CP: 16.5% TDN: 66% RFV: 94

  9. Experimental Design • “Gate cut” two groups of calves • 48 in each group • Calves weaned 30 days prior to study • Calf data: • Weight • Frame score • Switch length

  10. Experimental Design • Group A • Rotationally grazing Teff grass pasture • 20 acres • Group B • Continuous grazing cool season pasture (fescue/OG/clover) • 40+ acres • Grazed for 69 days (September 30)

  11. Calf Beginning Weights

  12. Start Grazing July 27 • 17 Days after cutting • Teff 20” tall • Rotational system • 8 2.5A paddocks • Portable water trough • 3-4 day rotation

  13. Water Consumption • Water meter to measure calf H2O intake • Drank 5 gal/hd/day • Typical intake is 10.2 gal/hd/day

  14. August 3Teff grew 16” in 23 days after cutting!

  15. August 13

  16. August 18

  17. Finished Grazing Sept. 30 • Teff pasture was completely utilized • Pulled calves, sorted, weighed

  18. Efficiency of Gain

  19. QUESTIONS?

  20. Tolerance of Teff (Eragrostis tef) var. “Tiffany” to Several Selective Herbicides Brian JonesAgronomy Extension Agent

  21. Objective • Limited literature exists on selective weed control in teff • Objective was to examine the effect of several common selective forage herbicides on teff growth and yield

  22. Establishment • Variety: “Tiffany” teff • Planting date: 3 June, 2009 • Seeding rate: 7 lb/A • Seeding tool: Brillion seeder • Previous crop: Barley harvested as silage • Site prep: • Turbo-till vertical tillage (23 May) • Pasture harrow (25 May) • Fertilizer applied 31 May: • 64 lb 0-0-62.5 • 83 lb 10-34-0 • 52 lb 30% UAN • Burndown herbicide applied 31 May • 1.5 qt/A Gamoxone Nteon

  23. Herbicide Treatments • Treatments applied on 10 August in a randomized complete block design with four replications

  24. Teff on 10 August • Treatments applied to teff after 17 days of re-growth occurred from hay cutting

  25. Weed Species Composition • Number of common forage weed species present, including • Canada thistle • Bull thistle • Pigweed spp. • Horsenettle • Broadleaf dock • Weed composition and cover varied between treatments • Teff stand was consistent and above 90% ground cover in all treatments

  26. Teff Yield • Teff harvested on 22 September (6 WAT) • Sample weight and dry matter determined

  27. P ≤ 0.05 NS NS NS NS NS

  28. Milestone Grazon P+D Control Rifle 2,4-D

  29. Summary • No difference in teff yield observed between treatments • No visual difference in teff performance noted between treatments • A more thorough investigation of herbicide application at different teff growth stages should be performed

  30. QUESTIONS?

More Related