430 likes | 590 Views
FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting April 24-26, 2012. Climatic Effects in Airfield Pavement Design and Construction. Dan Zollinger Marcello Sanchez Texas A&M University. Typical Pavement Section. Slab Curling and Warping. Cracking and Delamination. Delamination and Sounding.
E N D
FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting April 24-26, 2012 Climatic Effects in Airfield Pavement Design and Construction Dan Zollinger Marcello Sanchez Texas A&M University
Ultra-Sonic Testing <40% Delaminated ~70% Delaminated
Moisture-Based Maturity
Monitoring: Lab Cure Monitoring: Field Cure
Field Monitoring
Where is the Innovation in Curing Technology? • Equipment Automation? • Rate of application • Pressure/rate of travel • Bar height • Specification & Evaluation? • Monitor application amount • Monitor quality • New Methods and Materials? • Contractor Incentive?
Slab Curling Temperature Gradient Ro Slab Top Tavg Night Day Slab Bottom
Findings Assessment Causes Mitigation PE’s > 0.2 lbs/ft2/h EI’s > 0.800 • Dry and windy weather conditions • Surface wetting behind the paver • Quality of the cure • Compound • Time of placing • Original slab dimensions • Curing quality needs to improve • Potential for problems still exist however • Improved management strategy
CODE_BRIGHT Computational Code • Coupled analysis in porous media • Interaction with the atmosphere (Olivella, 1995;Guimarães, 2002; Sánchez, 2004) • Finite element in space • 1D, 2D and 3D elements • Monolithic coupling • Full Newton-Raphson • Finite difference in time • Implicit time discretisation scheme • Automatic time advance • Mass conservative approach for mass • balance equations • User-friendly pre/post processing of data
THM behavior in porous medium phases Saturated Medium Unsaturated Medium
Solid Liquid Gas Coupled THM Formulation • Balance equations (Olivella, 1994; Guimarães, 2002; Sánchez, 2004) • Mass balance of water (Pl ) • Mass balance of air (Pg) • Internal energy balance ( T ) • Momentum balance ( u)
Constitutive equations and equilibrium restrictions Establish the link between dependent and state variables
Heater 0.019 m (0.75”) 0.1429 m (6”– 0.75”/2) 0.1334 m (6”– 0.75”) 0.1429 m (6”– 0.75”/2) - 29 Pipes @ 6” (0.1524 m) on each row - Total Pipes: 3-row 29-column = 87 P-401 HMA 0.127 m (5 in.) 1 2 0.5144 m (20.25 in.) Concrete slab (12 in) + Insulation (0.25 in) + Concrete base (8 in) 3 2 3 2 1 4 5 Concrete (2.625 in.) 0.0667 m 1 Dense Grade Aggregate 0.1524 m (6 in.) Pipe (0.75 in.) 0.019 m 2 (0,0) Concrete (2.25 in.) 0.0572 m 3 Insulator (0.25 in.) 0.0064 m 4 Subgrade 1.0 m (39.37 in) Concrete (8.0 in.) 0.2032 m 5 4.572 m (180 in.) (15 ft.)
Formation of Horizontal Delamination Direction of Paving Tensile Stress Evaporation 80~90% rh Stress Distribution Delamination Moisture Distribution ~98% rh Delaminations are more severe in the direction of paving
Case 1 vs Case 2 (Temperature) Case 1 Case 2
Case 1 vs Case 2 (RH) Case 1 Case 2
Where are the Tools? • Paving construction requires curing management • Variable weather conditions • Methods of construction change • Not all curing compounds/methods are created equal • Paving/Slab configurations • Length and width of drag/LT devices • Slab lengths • Subbase types and thicknesses