350 likes | 673 Views
Audiometric Configurations in Children. Andrea Pittman, Ph.D. Arizona State University. Method. Groups 6-year-old children 60-year-old adults Audiogram Selection Criteria Right ear thresholds only Thresholds for each octave test frequency (250-8000 Hz)
E N D
Audiometric Configurations in Children Andrea Pittman, Ph.D. Arizona State University
Method • Groups • 6-year-old children • 60-year-old adults • Audiogram Selection Criteria • Right ear thresholds only • Thresholds for each octave test frequency (250-8000 Hz) • At least one threshold > 30 dB HL • Confirmed sensorinueral hearing loss by bone conduction audiometry • Air-bone gaps < 10 dB
Method • Core Set of Audiograms • 227 children • 248 adults • Analyses • Configuration • Asymmetry • Progression
*Transducer Effects Frequency (Hz) Hearing Level (dB)
NBS 9A Coupler TDH Series Earphone 6cm3 Mic *Transducer Effects
Frequency (Hz) Mic Hearing Level (dB) 2cm3 6cm3 Mic ER 3A Mic *Transducer Effects
All Audiograms Adults (n=248) Children (n=227)
All Audiograms Adults (n=248) Children (n=227)
All Audiograms Adults (n=248) Children (n=227)
All Audiograms Adults (n=248) Children (n=227)
All Audiograms Adults (n=248) Children (n=227)
Audiometric Classification Frequency (Hz) Sloping Rising Flat Hearing Level (dB) U-Shaped Tent-Shaped Other
Adults Children Results (Mean) Frequency (Hz) Sloping Rising Flat Hearing Level (dB) U-Shaped Tent-Shaped Other
Adults Children Results (Mean) Frequency (Hz) Sloping Rising Flat Hearing Level (dB) U-Shaped Tent-Shaped Other
Adults Children Results (Mean) Frequency (Hz) Sloping Rising Flat Hearing Level (dB) U-Shaped Tent-Shaped Other
Adults Children Results (Mean) Frequency (Hz) Sloping Rising Flat Hearing Level (dB) U-Shaped Tent-Shaped Other
Results (SD) Adults Children +1SD Frequency (Hz) Sloping Rising Flat Hearing Level (dB) U-Shaped Tent-Shaped Other
Results (SD) Adults Children Frequency (Hz) Sloping Rising Hearing Level (dB) U-Shaped Tent-Shaped Other
Results (SD) Adults Children Frequency (Hz) Sloping Rising Flat Hearing Level (dB) U-Shaped Tent-Shaped Other
Distribution of Configurations Percent of Audiograms Category
Adults Children Sloping U-Shaped *Sloping Losses Frequency (Hz) Rising Flat Hearing Level (dB) Tent-Shaped Other
Adults Children *Sloping Losses Frequency (Hz) Hearing Level (dB)
Adults Children *Sloping Losses Frequency (Hz) Hearing Level (dB)
*Sloping Losses Adults Children
Asymmetry 4000 Hz Adults Children Left-ear Threshold Right-ear Threshold
*Binaural Fitting Strategies Frequency (Hz) Hearing Level (dB)
Progression Frequency (Hz) Hearing Level (dB) Baseline Audiogram (6-yr-old) Subsequent Audiogram +5 +5 +10 +10 +20 +15
60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Progression Change in Threshold (dB) Age at Subsequent Audiogram (years)
Progression Change in Threshold (dB) Number of Thresholds
Summary • Configuration • Children had a wider variety of audiometric configurations • Asymmetry • More children had asymmetric losses and those asymmetries were more severe • Progression/Fluctuation • Thresholds increased and decreased on subsequent audiograms
Frequency (Hz) Hearing Level (dB) The End