210 likes | 280 Views
How simple analysis opened up a new source of income Lee Gisbourne – Database Marketing Manager. Agenda. Background Database Marketing The Challenge The Analysis The Campaign Results Questions. 1 Background (a). Key dates. Charity founded in 1824
E N D
How simple analysis opened up a new source of income Lee Gisbourne – Database Marketing Manager
Agenda • Background • Database Marketing • The Challenge • The Analysis • The Campaign • Results • Questions
1 Background (a) Key dates • Charity founded in 1824 • (National Institution for the Preservation of Life from Shipwreck …) • Royal National Lifeboat Institution 1854 • First co-ordinated rescues with helicopters 1957 • Inland waters and beach lifeguards 2001 • Hovercraft and lifeboats on the Thames 2002 • Training college & survival centre 2004
1 Background (b) Key facts • Saving lives at sea • 235 stations • 330 lifeboats • 4,600 crew 3,000 shoreline helpers • 163 beaches • 20 boats, 11 RWC • 900 lifeguards / 120 volunteers • 1,000+ fundraising branches and guilds • 35,000 volunteer fundraisers • 97% volunteers
1 Background (c) The cost … • £64.2M rescue • £49.6M operational service • £4M prevention • £23M fundraising • No UK Government funding
1 Background (d) … and the benefit • 8,713 launches in 2010 • 309 lives saved • 8,313 rescues (23 a day) • Beach Lifeguards called to 16,664 incidents in 2010 • Assisted 18,779 people • 107 lives saved • Since 1824 more than 139,000 lives saved
2 Database marketing Key responsibilities • Mailing selection & extraction – 100+ campaigns • Data management - 2M supporter records • Campaign results analysis • Ad-hoc reporting • KPI reporting • Insight delivery • …delivery of data driven marketing
3 The challenge (a) RNLI challenge • Find a ‘significant’ new income stream • …from existing supporters • Believed we have an affluent supporter base • £25 average gift • Full calendar of appeals and asks • Within the constraints of current internal systems
3 The challenge (b) Marketing challenge and aims • Recognise ‘higher value’ supporters • Provide a personalised supporter experience • Introduce a tangible ask - £1214 to train a crew member • Short term - 1 year commitment to training • Allow the supporter to donate in the way that suited them • Bridge the gap between ‘high level donors’ and ‘higher value’ supporters
4 Analysis (a) Understanding the supporter base • Past behaviour • Transaction history • Personal data • Purchased demographics • Acorn classifications • Wealth intelligence • Acxiom variables
4 Analysis (b) Acorn classifications - wealthy achievers • Do the RNLI have an affluent base? • Is this just the charity supporting population?
4 Analysis (c) Household affluence • Acxiom waited attribute including; ~ Household Income ~ Type of Property ~ Council Tax Banding of property ~ Home ownership Status ~ Number of earners in household ~ Dependent children in household ~ Investment Activity ~ Credit Cards in household ~ Technology in household
4 Analysis (d) Wealth intelligence • Data audit • Wealth bands • Geographic region • Age bands • Social and corporate attitudes • Charity segments
4 Analysis (e) Year of last donation • 1/3 this year - active • 1/3 1 to 4 years • 1/3 5 years and over
4 Analysis (f) Total value of gifts over the last 12 months • 30% - under £25 • 60% - £25 - £100 • 3% - £200 - £5000
5 The Campaign (a) The target market • Analysis showed an affluent supporter base • Decided to adapt a classic RFV • Had given between £200 & £5,000 per year • Had to have given it for the last 2 consecutive years • Been supporting for over 5 years
Personalised letter – giving history and years supporting A case for support document – highlighting what training crew go through Donation form and reply envelope Personal welcome call Several update mailings themed around training 5 The Campaign (b) The ‘pack’
5 The Campaign (c) 3 Test segments • High value committed givers - 370 • High value cash supporters - 410 • High value supporters choosing multiple payment methods - 370 Targets • Learn • 1% response rate
6 Results (a) Campaign results • Committed – 4% RR • Cash – 11% RR • Multi – 12% RR • 87 gave the full amount • Pack cost £5.16 • Extra costs to manage elements externally • Gift Aid Income £23K • 12 months before £44,000 • 12 months following £117,000 • 166% increase in income
6 Results (b) Next Steps • Monitor the responders for the next 12 months - what do they do when they aren’t asked? • 23 supporters have decide to continue • Roll out to a large audience in 2012 • Tackle internal processing issues
6 Results (c) Key Learning's and Advice • People will analyse your date for free … let them • You have a database full of data … you know your data better than anyone • Recency, Frequency, Value is always a good place to start • Supporters will give high value gifts … but you do have to ask • Do not let internal systems stop you testing something new … if you wait for systems to be perfect it will never happen