1 / 35

Effects of Display Position and Control Space Orientation on User Preference and Performance

Effects of Display Position and Control Space Orientation on User Preference and Performance. Presented at CHI2006, April, 2006 Daniel Wigdor Chia Shen Clifton Forlines Ravin Balakrishnan. Problem. Motivation. Issues. Display Position. Control Space Orientation. Related Work. HCI:

leilani-tillman
Download Presentation

Effects of Display Position and Control Space Orientation on User Preference and Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effects of Display Position and Control Space Orientation on User Preference and Performance Presented at CHI2006, April, 2006 Daniel Wigdor Chia Shen Clifton Forlines Ravin Balakrishnan

  2. Problem

  3. Motivation

  4. Issues Display Position Control Space Orientation

  5. Related Work HCI: • Nacenta et al. (2005) Psychology: • Hemholtz (1866), Stratton (1897): prism glasses • Cunningham (1989) • Cunningham & Welch (1994)

  6. Our Goals Find: • Preferred: • Display position(s) • Control orientation(s) for each position • Optimal: • Display position(s) • Control orientation for each position • Performance penalties Recommend: • Ideal display position(s) • Ideal control orientation(s)

  7. Two Experiments: Preference, Performance

  8. Two Experiments: Preference, Performance

  9. Task • Docking task:

  10. Study 1: All About Preference • Setup: • Perform task at all 8 display positions • Participant sets control orientation • Measure: • Task time & error rate • Control orientation chosen by the participant • Participants’ preferred display position • Tells us: • Optimal display position • Preferred control orientation for each position • Performance at preferred control orientation

  11. Design • 8 participants (all right handed) • 8 display positions • 40 trials per position • Participant-set control orientation +

  12. Results: Display Position Preference • 6 of 8 participants prefer NE or NW position

  13. Results: Control Orientation Preference

  14. Results: Control Orientation Preference

  15. Results: Control Orientation Preference

  16. Study 2: All About Performance • Setup: • Perform task at all 8 display positions • For each position, perform task at 8 control orientations • Measure: • Task time & error rate • Drag paths • Tells us: • Optimal control orientation for each position • Penalty for not meeting optimal • Display position and control orientation for shared displays

  17. Design • 8 participants (all right handed) • 4 display positions each (8 total) • 4 fixed control orientations each (8 total) • 80 trials per position +

  18. Results: Performance

  19. Results: Performance

  20. Screen North

  21. Screen North

  22. Screen North

  23. Screen North

  24. Results: Performance

  25. Results: Performance

  26. Design Recommendations

  27. Design Recommendations

  28. Design Recommendations

  29. Design Recommendations

  30. Design Recommendations

  31. Design Recommendations

  32. Design Recommendations

  33. Design Recommendations

  34. Acknowledgements • Dr. Helen Cunningham • Experimental participants • John Barnwell • Edward Tse • CHI meta-reviewer • ARDA

  35. Questions?

More Related