330 likes | 428 Views
This is a filmstrip of a normal 35mm negative, nothing special to it. This is the size of the maximum camera aperture, called FULL APERTURE or FULL GATE, and - since it was the common format used in the beginning of cinema - SILENT.
E N D
This is a filmstrip of a normal 35mm negative, nothing special to it
This is the size of the maximum camera aperture, called FULL APERTURE or FULL GATE, and - since it was the common format used in the beginning of cinema - SILENT.
This is the size of the maximum camera aperture, called FULL APERTURE or FULL GATE, and - since it was the common format used in the beginning of cinema - SILENT. This format uses the whole negative area available: 4 perforations in height and a width to fit exactly between the two rows of perforation holes. The aspect ratio of this format is 1:1.33
Most film productions use a smaller portion of the negative though.
Most film productions use a smaller portion of the negative though. Popular formats include: 1:1.85 the American widescreen format
Most film productions use a smaller portion of the negative though. Popular formats include: 1:1.85 the American widescreen format and 1:1.78 For HDTV (16:9)
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”:
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”:
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”:
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”:
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”:
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”:
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”:
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”:
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”:
And here is what happens when “rolling camera”: The movement advances the film 4 perforations for each new frame.
A closer look at the exposed negative: Since many formats don´t use the full height of the negative, there remains a gap between the frames: unused, good for nothing - and 1 perforation in height!
A closer look at the exposed negative: Since many formats don´t use the full height of the negative, there remains a gap between the frames: unused, good for nothing - and 1 perforation in height! This is a precious rawstock, adding to the overall lenght of the negative, which needs to be purchased, developed and printed.
A closer look at the exposed negative: As a remainder: Developing and printing are normally billed by lenght. Since many formats don´t use the full height of the negative, there remains a gap between the frames: unused, good for nothing - and 1 perforation in height! This is a precious rawstock, adding to the overall lenght of the negative, which needs to be purchased, developed and printed.
So wouldn´t it make sense to stop wasting negative space, and get rid of the useless gap between the frames?
So wouldn´t it make sense to stop wasting negative space, and get rid of the useless gap between the frames?
So wouldn´t it make sense to stop wasting negative space, and get rid of the useless gap between the frames?
So wouldn´t it make sense to stop wasting negative space, and get rid of the useless gap between the frames?
For each new frame the 3 perforation movement advances the film only 3 perforations. This way the unused space between frames is eliminated. That´s exactly what 3 perforation does: