150 likes | 259 Views
Preservation Program Southern European Libraries Link. FCCN, 3 June 2011 João Mendes Moreira B-on Manager Jmm@fccn.pt. Agenda. Scope and goals Existing solutions Comparative analisys Conclusions Recomendations. Selection criteria. Terms and conditions Consortium/ Member support
E N D
PreservationProgramSouthern EuropeanLibraries Link FCCN, 3 June 2011João Mendes Moreira B-on Manager Jmm@fccn.pt
Agenda • Scope and goals • Existing solutions • Comparative analisys • Conclusions • Recomendations
Selectioncriteria • Termsandconditions • Consortium/Membersupport • Contents(vendors, titlese temporal coverage) • Costs(subscriptionandsupport/maintenance)
Existingsolutions • Local loading • LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keeps Stuff Safe) • CLOCKSS (Controlled LOCKSS) • PORTICO
Detailed Comparativeanalysis
23% ofb-ontitles are preservedbyPortico(this figure tends to increase). • Thispercentagedoesn’tinclude: • EBSCO aggregator (63%) titles • IEEE and ACM proceedingsand standards • Fromthe 7. 000 availabletitles, 4.376 are inPortico (61% ofsubscribedtitles).
TOP 10 - Preservation 7 outof 10 top 10 are preservedbyporticowithPCA
Final considerations • Local – solution to much expensive; need to allocate HR and IT • CLOCKSS - solution is not suitable since does not support post-cancellation • LOCKSS – suitable terms and conditions but bad content coverage • Portico – solution more suitable with better coverage and terms and conditions
Conclusions • There is no single solution that grants preservation to all contents due to their typology and nature. • Localhosting despite its content coverage and terms and conditions potential its not suitable for b-on due to development and operation costs • B-on contents include a big rate of titles provided by aggregators that are not eligible for preservation • Referential databases are also not eligible for preservation
Conclusions • Porticoseams to bethemostsuitablesolutions • There are contentsthat are notdealtbythisservice • There are limitationsattheaccesslevel
Recomendations • Adopt Portico • Continue to follow preservation initiatives • Establish international partnerships in order to promote local hosting solutions and share of services and costs • Make pressure of vendors in order to foster their participation on preservation initiatives