420 likes | 622 Views
Change and Emerging Technologies The Library’s Role in Supporting Teaching and Learning in a 2.0 Environment. Jeff Trzeciak, University Librarian Cathy Moulder, Director of Library Services, Maps, Data & GIS Olga Perkovic, Liaison Librarian, Anthropology & History. Transforming Libraries.
E N D
Change andEmerging TechnologiesThe Library’s Role in SupportingTeaching and Learning in a 2.0 Environment Jeff Trzeciak, University Librarian Cathy Moulder, Director of Library Services, Maps, Data & GIS Olga Perkovic, Liaison Librarian, Anthropology & History
Transforming Libraries From traditional “service-provider” to a new understanding of how students learn and how faculty discover new knowledge
About McMaster McMaster University Top 100 Universities worldwide Canada’s most research intensive Recognized as “Canada’s most innovative” Problem-based learning
McMaster University Library Challenges Library in state of decline 1991: Ranked 86th among Association of Research Libraries 2006: Ranked 109th
Significant Challenges Lowest funded research library in Canada Lowest # of librarians in ARL Biggest challenges: Library as silo Library as “book warehouse”
Other Significant Challenge: University in Transition 3 Provosts in 18 months Structural budget problems Changes at VP and Dean levels
Library Transformation • Library Vision • McMaster University Library will be recognized as Canada's most innovative, user-centred, academic library
Library Transformation Mission The University Library advances teaching, learning and research at McMaster by: • teaching students to be successful, ethical information seekers • facilitating access to information resources • providing welcoming spaces for intellectual discovery, and • promoting the innovative adoption of emerging learning technologies
Library Transformation • Two significant accomplishments • Library Liaison Program • Learning 2.0
Wikis in the Libraries • Primary purpose: • Connecting the libraries to our faculty and our students • Secondary: • Emerging technology
Collaborative Partnership I • Geo 4G03 + Library • Canadian Glacier Inventory Project (CGIP) • Data gathering as 4th year class assignment • Traditional impediment = Security
Wiki to the Rescue • Wikis require: • No access to University servers • No html coding or file uploads by TAs • No effort to setup (library-mediated) • No big learning curve
Collaborative Partnership II • Geo 3HZ3 + Library • Major assignment for 3rd year class on segregation in world cities • Assignment needed to be: • Research-based • Group work (not homogenous students) • Capstone to previous learning
Wiki Encore • Wikis offer: • Collaborative student experience • WYSIWYG interface and cool web functions • Integration of research, maps, graphs, illustrations, links • Creative potential • Element of surprise and innovation
Wiki Selection Criteria • Remotely hosted • Free • WYSIWYG • Minimal learning curve • Functions: edit history, page comparison, user reports, revert to previous version • Discussion and comment areas • Minimal advertisements
Wiki Start-up • Library staff: • Created wikis, created pages for info resources, created “page stubs” • Invited faculty and teaching assistants as moderators • Teaching staff: • Created pages for introduction and student instructions • Invited students as writers
Assessment • Wikis replaced traditional outcomes • Marking criteria: • Standard essay-writing skills (including completeness, analysis of content) • Artistic elements (creativity, originality, graphic design) • Participation (number of comments, evidence of collaboration)
Results • Public visibility and writing for a diverse audience = motivating factors • Good quality writing and editing • Web writing has to be more “interesting”
Unexpected Results • Collaboration • Technical difficulties • Difficulties capturing or destroying the content afterwards • Repeat experience not as positive
Collaborative Partnership III • History 2P03 + Library • Inquiry model; small class setting • Research Skills set (1 component of 4) • Wiki purpose
Wiki Start-up • Librarian: • Created wiki, 5 section pages and research resources pages, student instructions • Invited faculty as administrators • Faculty: • Added content and exemplars • Admin staff invited students as writers
Results • Slow start; modifications sparked activity • Wiki as a research resource • Wiki as a communication tool
Unexpected Results • Faculty feedback • Student feedback • Face to face sharing
What Did We Learn? • Be selective: • Work with early innovators • Choose assignment tasks carefully • Know your students • Consider overlapping technologies • Wikis have limitations
Collaboration is the Reward • Faculty and Librarians working together on learning objectives, assignment creation, marking • Strengthening the Liaison program • Writing papers and funding requests together • Extending the CGIP wiki to include an American class on remote sensing
Is It Working? • Library offering Social Toolbox • 2.0 software (blogs, wikis) for campus community • Campus understands in the context of “access” and “preservation”
Broader Context: Library asPartner in Teaching and Learning • Inherited Classroom Audio Visual Services • Staff of 10 • Budget of $1m (approx) • Responsible for all classroom technologies • Opportunity to integrate instructional technologies, academic resources, and support services
Campus Leadership • Innovative Learning campaign item • Task Force on Teaching and Learning • Burlington campus learning space design • iSci, Honours research science
Libraries as Academic Computing • Mills • State-of-the-art classroom • Videoconferencing facilities • Text-analysis centre? • Thode Learning Commons • Grid computing? • Visualization facilities? • Collaboratory
Future • Central part of a CFI proposal • 3D Web research • Augmented reality • Simulation