140 likes | 289 Views
Instantaneous Fluid Film Imaging in Chemical Mechanical Planarization. Daniel Apone, Caprice Gray, Chris Rogers, Vincent P. Manno, Chris Barns, Mansour Moinpour, Sriram Anjur, Ara Philipossian. Motivation.
E N D
Instantaneous Fluid Film Imaging in Chemical Mechanical Planarization Daniel Apone, Caprice Gray, Chris Rogers, Vincent P. Manno, Chris Barns, Mansour Moinpour, Sriram Anjur, Ara Philipossian
Motivation • Microelectronic devices continue to decrease in size; current features are routinely smaller than 100nm • The semiconductor industry requires a deeper understanding of the physical processes involved in CMP to help attain smoother surfaces • Using Dual Emission Laser Induced Fluorescence (DELIF) we can measure instantaneous fluid film thicknesses (and temperatures) during a polishing run • Here we look at how the pad conforms to features on a wafer
Polishing Setup • Struers RotoPol-31 table top polisher • Polisher sits atop a force transducer table capable of measuring down and shear forces during a polish
Optical Setup • Evolution VF 12 bit digital cameras • Region of Interrogation: 3 cm across on pad • Second ROI: 3mm on pad • 355 nm Nd-YAG Laser provides excitation light • Laser Pulse Length: 6ns
Dual Emission Laser Induced Fluorescence • Calcein in slurry solution • UV light excites Pad’s natural fluorescence • Pad’s emission excites Calcein • Each emission is captured by a camera • Taking the ratio of the two emissions normalizes the image by initial excitation intensity
Experimental Parameters • Freudenberg FX9 Pad • Wafer & Platen Rotation: 30 rpm • Relative Velocity: 0.34 m/s • Downforce: 1.8 PSI • Slurry • Flow Rate: 50 cc/min • 9:1 dilution • 0.5 g/L Calcein
Results • Images are 3 cm viewing area on pad • Air bubbles contained in a wave of slurry • Striations made by conditioner • Small circles are shadows of dried slurry on top of wafer
Previous Work • Film thickness increases as pad speed increases • Inverse relationship for downforce and thickness • Film thickness are measured from the wafer surface down to some mean height within the pad
Searching for Contact…. • Images are 3 mm viewing area on pad; can see individual asperities • Dark areas have less fluid, indicate peaks • Bright areas are holes in pad, more fluid there • 10psi static image, to make sure contact was occurring • Contact points seem to be few and far between
Conclusion • Pad topology seems to be the governing factor as to whether or not Pad/Wafer contact is occurring. • Wafer seems to be supported by only a few peaks at any given time, the vast majority of asperities do not reach up to the wafer.
Future Work • Investigate much larger region, to view multiple contact points in one image • Ability to resolve individual asperities is necessary to determine if contact is occurring • Correlate applied pressure with amount of contact? • Correlate amount of contact with changes in friction data?
The End • Acknowledgements • Intel • Cabot Microelectronics • University of Arizona • Questions?