WFD: HMWB & AWB Geomorphological MMA Workshop Arup Campus, Monday the 28 th of May 2012

1. WFD: HMWB & AWB Geomorphological MMA WorkshopArup Campus, Monday the 28th of May 2012 Process

2. Specific Actions for Specific Locations General Approach

3. General Approach

4. Excel-based General Approach

5. Excel-based General Approach

6. The Team & Input

7. Input

8. Input

9. Input

10. The Process

11. Process– Humber RBMP

12. Process – Example from Humber RBMP

13. Process – Understand WB & Generic Pressures

14. Process – Understand WB & Generic Pressures

15. Identify specific pressures Process – ‘Sense Check’

16. Identify specific pressures Process – ‘Sense Check’

17. Identify specific pressures Process – ‘Sense Check’

18. Identify specific pressures Meeting with EA teams Process – ‘Sense Check’

19. Process – ‘Sense Check’

20. Identify specific pressures Ops GIS layers Obstructions database Detailed river network Flood zones WFD Monitoring points Abstractions Process – ‘Sense Check’

21. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Process – ‘Sense Check’

22. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Process – ‘Sense Check’

23. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Process – ‘Sense Check’

24. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Process – ‘Sense Check’

25. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Process – ‘Sense Check’

26. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Measures Carried Forward Process – ‘Sense Check’

27. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process ‘Sense Check’ Process – ‘Sense Check’

28. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Process – ‘Sense Check’

29. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Process – ‘Stage 2’

30. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Process – ‘Stage 2’

31. Process – ‘Stage 2’

32. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Process – ‘Stage 2’

33. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Process – ‘Stage 2’

34. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Process – ‘Stage 2’

35. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Process – ‘Stage 2’

36. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Process – ‘Stage 2’

37. Identify specific pressures ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Process – ‘Stage 2’

38. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Process – ‘Action Assessment’

39. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment ‘Low’ £0 - £25k ‘Medium’ £25 - £50K ‘High’ £50+ Process – ‘Action Assessment’

40. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Final key criteria

41. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Final criteria Actions Carried forward

42. Identify specific pressures Identify generic mitigation Specific Actions for Specific Locations Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Final criteria Actions Carried forward

43. Process – ‘Action Assessment’

44. Spatially Linked Relevant to waterbody Relevant to waterbody Quick! Quick! Decision Making Potential Improvement • More GIS-based process • Consultation/discussion with ‘preferred options’ • Greater flexibility in spreadsheet for different contexts • More initial filtering of measures (feasibility, relevancy and cost) Potential Improvement

45. Questions?

46. More information: • Matthew Johnson matthew.johnson@arup.com • Natalie Walker natalie.walker@arup.com • Patricia Xavier patricia.xavier@arup.com Thanks for Listening!