Cedar Mountain Survey Results

1. Cedar MountainSurvey Results Account Executive: Jon Woehl Managing Director: Sarah Gass Executive Director: Mike Rich

2. Completion Rate • 1352 surveys mailed out • 347 returned surveys • 344 received in mail • 3 completed via online • Response rate of 26%

3. Channels for information received

4. Gender

5. Age of Respondents

6. Size of Household

7. Years lived in Cedar Mountain School District

8. Number of school age children

9. Current school-aged children

10. Occupation of Respondents

11. Respondents by Resident Status

12. Respondents’ Status

13. Differences IN Perceptions By Agricultural Landowners and Other Residents

14. Average level of agreement regarding current school building

15. Average level of agreement regarding physical improvements to the Cedar Mountain School

16. Level of agreement on the proposed changes will benefit students even though respondent does not have school age children

17. Factors to determine level of support toward proposed bond referendum

18. Average level of agreement regarding proposed bond referendum

19. Average level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary

20. Tax Rate per Acre According to District

21. Perceptions of Voting Residents

22. Average level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on the school children attend

23. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend 78%

24. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

25. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

26. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

27. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend 17%

28. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on school children attend

29. Average level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation

30. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

31. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

32. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

33. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

34. Level of agreement with upgrades to building structure are necessary based on occupation of resident

35. Conclusions • Cost is the primary factor that will determine community members’ support for the proposed bond referendum. • A high percentage of respondents, who are residents and non-agricultural producers, agreed that upgrades were necessary. • More than 50% of Agricultural Landowners would agree that the proposed changes would benefit students even though respondents do not have school aged children.

36. Conclusions • Respondents employed in Morgan or Franklin strongly agree that there is a need for upgrades to the current school facility. • Other occupation groups including Agricultural Producers indicated they also agree. • Other Residents of the Cedar Mountain School District agree more strongly that upgrades are necessary than Agricultural Landowners.

37. Conclusions • Regarding the proposed bond referendum, other residents and Agricultural landowners agreed that there was ample information to make an informed decision and that the community can come to a consensus.

38. Concluding comments or questions?