1 / 12

Field Operational Test Planning

Field Operational Test Planning. Presented by: Dave LeBlanc UMTRI ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition Palm Springs, CA June 6, 2007. Topics. Objectives of FOT Experimental design Data collection Challenges. Objectives of FOT. Impacts on safety

levia
Download Presentation

Field Operational Test Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Field Operational Test Planning Presented by: Dave LeBlanc UMTRI ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition Palm Springs, CA June 6, 2007

  2. Topics • Objectives of FOT • Experimental design • Data collection • Challenges

  3. Objectives of FOT • Impacts on safety • Interactions during conflicts, near-crashes • Influences on driver behavior • Unintended consequences • Support safety benefits calculations by independent evaluator • Driver acceptance • Usability, satisfaction, willingness to purchase • Data archive of driving • “360 deg” sensor coverage

  4. 2007-8 Honda Accord EX Preliminary Experimental Design – Light Vehicle Platform • 108 drivers from southeast Michigan • 80 x 100 mile area • gender balance, 3 age groups • 16 vehicles ‘as their own’ • Nominal exposure: 6 weeks • 2 weeks baseline (IVBSS ‘silent’) • 4 weeks IVBSS enabled • 12 months, 275,000 miles • Exploring: targeting sub-populations &/or mixing in longer exposures to increase system exposure to near-crashes

  5. International 8600 series Preliminary Experimental Design – Heavy Vehicle Platform • Conway Freight (7,786 tractors; 30,449 trailers ) • Terminal in Romulus, MI (near Detroit metro airport) : • Line hauls • Local pickup/delivery • 15-20 drivers • 11 tractors (10 in field, 1 spare) • Long box, pup, double-pup trailers • 740,000 miles and 30,000 hours of driving

  6. Biographical & demographic data Onboard data Numerical Video Audio Offline-data Weather Roadway Crash data Pre-drive questionnaires Attitudes, behavior, style Post-drive questionnaires Focus groups FOT Data Archive Objective Data Subjective Data

  7. Onboard Data Collection • Continuous data from IVBSS system, vehicle, and FOT sensors* • 10 Hz to 50 Hz • Hundreds of data signals, plus: • 5 cameras with adaptive frame rates and compression • 7 radars (LV), 6 radars (HT) • Audio • Cell modem for remote monitoring * Sensors installed for analysis purposes but not used for IVBSS function0

  8. FOT sensors • Cameras: • Forward scene (may share with LDW) • Driver face • Over-shoulder • Left side (may share with LCM) • Right side (may share with LCM) • Cabin microphone • Differential GPS • Tri-axial accelerometer GPS receiver

  9. Monitoring Vehicles in the Field– Light Vehicle Platform Cell modem data automatically loaded every ~15 minutes into database to allow team to monitor fleet over the Web Individualdriver trips Automatichighlightsto assistreviewers

  10. Con-way Freight Romulus Terminal Re-distribution Center Maintenance Facility 200 ft Tractor Parking 400 ft 600 ft 10

  11. DAS data networking

  12. ConcludingRemarks • Accomplishments to Date: • Identified objectives of FOT experiment • Established scope of FOT • Secured trucking fleet partner • Developed onboard data system requirements • Developed network concepts and prototype for off-site data servers • Activities in 2007 • Complete experimental design • Complete prototype data collection systems • Complete preliminary subjective instrument design

More Related