1 / 15

Role of Ecological Vulnerability Analysis in Safeguarding Communities from Climate Change

Role of Ecological Vulnerability Analysis in Safeguarding Communities from Climate Change. Hector Galbraith and Chris Hilke, National Wildlife Federation Lesley Sneddon and Geoff Hammerson , NatureServe. VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS. Ask questions about: What things are most vulnerable?

levia
Download Presentation

Role of Ecological Vulnerability Analysis in Safeguarding Communities from Climate Change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Role of Ecological Vulnerability Analysis in Safeguarding Communities from Climate Change • Hector Galbraith and Chris Hilke, National Wildlife Federation • Lesley Sneddon and Geoff Hammerson, NatureServe

  2. VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS Ask questions about: • What things are most vulnerable? • Whythey are vulnerable • Understanding why assists in determining possible adaptation responses

  3. NORTHEAST TAKES LEAD IN ECO. VA Northeast has been “incubator for VA methods. Most states are doing or have completed VAs: MA Complete (habitats/species) CT Complete (species) NY Complete (habitats/species) NJ Underway (habitats/species) ME Complete (habitats/ species) VT Underway(habitats and species) VA Underway (species) WV Complete (species) NH Underway PA Complete (species) MD Complete

  4. NORTHEASTERN REGIONAL ECO. VA - WHY • Effective adaptation must be at regional level • States/agencies need to collaborate

  5. THE NEAFWA HABITAT VULNERABILITY MODEL 1. Vulnerability to climate change Index 2. Vulnerability to non-climate stressors Index 3. Interactions 5. Confidence evaluation 6. Narratives 4. Overall future vulnerability Index Reports on NEAFWA web site

  6. REGIONAL ZONES

  7. Habitat Vulnerability Summary • Four major habitats highly vulnerable: • Alpine tundra • Spruce-fir (boreal) forest • Cold water fish habitat (though may not be as vulnerable as previously thought) • Coastal habitats

  8. Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCVI) Comparison • CCVI is species vulnerability model developed by NatureServe and used in numerous situations in North America • CCVI used on 64 plant and animal species in Northeast • Used on “foundational species” as check on habitat resuults. • Compared three subregions: Northern Appalachians and Maritime Canada; North Atlantic; and Mid-Atlantic

  9. NALCC Regions

  10. CCVI Results • Spruce-fir Forest Northern Southern • Habitat model result: V CV • CCVI Red Spruce result: MV HV • CCVI Balsam Fir result: MV HV • CCVI Black Spruce result: MV HV • Bicknell’s Thrush result: MV HV

  11. Habitat Vulnerability Summary • Major habitats highly vulnerable: • Alpine tundra • Spruce-fir (boreal) forest • Cold water fish habitat • Coastal habitats Species analyses support habitat VA. What is relevance to local communities?

  12. Eco. Vulnerabilities and Community Resiliency Planning • North Shore, MA • Saltmarshes lost • Towns exposed

  13. Community Resiliency Planning on North Shore • Working with NS communities to plan adaptive responses. • VA as part of Community Adaptation Plan • Identifies ecosystem-oriented adaptation strategies that reduce risk and increase resiliency • Cost-benefits of “grey and green solutions” • Preserves ecosystem resilience, diversity, and other ecosystem services

  14. Ecological Restoration and Enhancement Native Salt Marsh Restoration Pepperweed removal Monitoring (Phragmitesaustralis) Restoration of over 325 acres of native marsh vegetation through the removal of two dominant non-native invasive plants (pepperweedand Phragmites)

  15. Next Steps • Have tools that can be used to plan local conservation but need to make them relevant and attractive to local communities, land trusts, etc. • Need to apply them in high profile case studies, like the North Shore. • Need to find some way to “institutionalize” their use at local levels. • Most important – Regional Adaptation Strategy

More Related