1 / 15

Teaching & Learning Developer scheme

Teaching & Learning Developer scheme. QM T&L conference Jan 2012 Professor Susan Dilly VP for Teaching and Learning. Reason for developing the scheme. Key function of QM is to provide high quality T&L to all students Staff have varied needs for T&L development

lexine
Download Presentation

Teaching & Learning Developer scheme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Teaching & Learning Developer scheme QM T&L conference Jan 2012 Professor Susan Dilly VP for Teaching and Learning

  2. Reason for developing the scheme • Key function of QM is to provide high quality T&L to all students • Staff have varied needs for T&L development • Ideas in T&L and student expectations change so all staff would benefit from keeping up-to-date

  3. Key features of the new scheme • All academic staff involved in teaching should participate • The scheme provides an alternative route for completing the T&L requirements of probation. • It will focus on ensuring competency and encouraging excellence in the practical aspects of T&L • It will be flexible to fit the needs of the participant and best use of learning resources, both internal and external to QMUL.

  4. Scheme for all academic staff • Scheme for probationers • Scheme for established staff ? Are these identical or separate elements

  5. Scheme for probationers • Similar to points-based scheme for researcher development • Captures generic and specific development activities • One point for approx 1 hour of activity • Activities are mapped to domains to create a balanced portfolio

  6. Practical issues • Existing College, Faculty and School activities need to be collated and approved by a cross-faculty academic group (Feb-June 2012) • College needs to develop a format for collecting and submitting data • Each probationer needs a supervisor who will agree the balance of T&L development activities and monitor progress at probation meetings

  7. Timescale 2012 • January 11th – Session at Teaching and Learning Conference on points-based scheme.   • January – Discussion at VPTLAG. • March – Paper to Senate for formal approval. • September 1st – New scheme for probationers begins.

  8. Phase 2 T&F group- volunteers welcome! • February – Agree domains, structures and technical aspects of database and software. • March - Map and award points to existing Learning Institute activities relevant to this scheme • March-May – Gather information of relevant activities at School and Faculty and accredit on database. • June – define the gaps in provision and map to HEA framework for consideration for HEA accreditation. • (Provisional dates- Feb 1st, Feb 29th, May 9th, June 27th- all Wednesday 3-5)

  9. The overall strategy • Phase 1- Identify the issues and potential solutions (August-Dec 2011) • Phase 2- Design and implement scheme for probationers (Feb-Sept 2012) • Phase 3- Evolution of CILT/PGCAP • Phase 4- Scheme for existing staff (Sept 2013)

  10. Topics for debate • Probationer scheme details- hours, domains, accredited activities, transition arrangements • Scheme for established staff - concept, breadth, desirability • CILT/PGCAP- future structure, focus, audience

  11. Question for debate • How many points/hours should a probationer need to achieve? • Is 100 hours an appropriate amount?

  12. Background • PGCAP • 60 credits • 600 notional hours of learning • 80-100 hours of actual contact • Completed in 2 years (max 3 yrs)

  13. Question for debate • Do we need domains and what should they be? • Teaching and learning practice (>50%) • Educational scholarship and research • Academic processes and administration

  14. Background • New UK Professional Standards Framework 2011 has • 3 ‘dimensions of academic practice’ with- • 5 ‘areas of activity’ • 6 ‘aspects of core knowledge’ • 4 ‘professional values’

More Related