1 / 16

railways

railways. in the past. to day. and tomorrow. Jan ILÍK Ministry of Transport, CZ. Role of Railway Transport. How does Europe work on rails? „zone 1“: HSR network + densely developed and used conventional lines high mobility of citizens clock-hour timetabling with high frequency

lfranks
Download Presentation

railways

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. railways in the past today and tomorrow Jan ILÍK Ministry of Transport, CZ

  2. Role of Railway Transport • How does Europe work on rails? • „zone 1“: • HSR network + densely developed and used conventional lines • high mobility of citizens • clock-hour timetabling with high frequency • railways competitive • „zone 2“: • significant improvements on conventional lines, first HSL projects • high mobility of citizens • clock-hour timetabling • high potential for further development of railway system • „zone 3“: • modernization – so far – without network effects, some lines in poor condition • lover mobility of citizens • limited offer of connections, sometimes only once/day • railway system in a difficult position, no new railway projects „zone 2“ „zone 1“ „zone 3“

  3. Mid-term Strategy • modernization of conventional network (completion) • better coordination of project across border • development of operational concepts and services

  4. Transit Corridors • modernization of infra since 1993 (CZ) • expected by 2020 – 25 – financing secured • completion of main railway trunk lines + • other important lines for a higher capacityofnetwork • precondition to make rail transport attractive • further improvements needed – also on modernized sections – esp. TEN-T a TSI requirements – e.g. length of trains 740 m, new technologies (ETCS) • why? • to solve problems: • low speed parameters • capacity problems due to increased demand • low project coordination with neighbours needed – „national thinkig“

  5. Czech Railway System • 2 types of passenger services: • PSO – services covered by public subsidies (not only ČD) • open access – since 2011, Praha – Ostrava (350 km), railway shorter than motorway • 2011 – 2 operators: ČD, RegioJet • 2012 – 3 operators: ČD, RegioJet, Leo Express • 2015 – Arriva – commuter and long distance open access • Experience: • increase of passenger (very low ticket prices) + better on-board services, more connections (train every 30 min.), PR for rail, pressure i.e. improvements of ČD services • problems: overlapping networks, short trains (No of seats offered) – track capacity – limited capacity for freight trains, offer reduction during off-peakhours • differentiation – from national to international services (Prague – SE Moravia, Prague – eastern SK, Prague – Bratislava TT 2017) • further expansion based on cooperation with bus services – easier and cheaper (RJ train – RJ bus, LeoExpress train – LE Bus/Flixbus) • ticketing (imcompatibility) • shift from competition in the market towards competition for the market planned

  6. International Projects • coordination of activities on cross-border sections • Targets by 2025: • Praha – Berlin 3 : 40 / 4: 30 (today) • Praha – München 4 : 15 / 5 : 50 (4:40 IC Bus) • Praha – Nürnberg 3 : 45 / 5 : 10 (3 : 38 IC Bus) • Praha – Wien 3 : 45 / 4 : 00 • Praha – Linz 3 : 40 / 4 : 50 (4:00 TT2017) • Praha – Bratislava 3 : 45 / 3 : 58 • Praha – Budapest 5 : 30 / 6 : 45 • Praha – Katowice 4 : 15 / 5: 09 • Both, infrastructural and operational improvements based on long term bi- or multilateral agreements • CZ-AT (2015) ministerial agreement on development of rail infrastructure and services until 2024, CZ-DE to belaunched (discussion) • Potencialtraveltimecuts Praha – Budapest: • full modernization Praha – Břeclav: app. 20 min • modernization Kúty – Bratislava – Štúrovo: app. 30 min • improvements Szob – Budapest:app. 5 min • terminus at Budapest Nyugatipu: app. 20 min modernizace nová trať koncepční řešení Brno Linz

  7. Further Perspective for Passenger Services • ambition: long-term participation of CZ operators and their rolling stock in international services in „zone 2“ • why? • stabilization of services – international trains = backbone of national services • use potential – of international transport and additional source of receipts (competition to flight & road) • based on governmental decision / part of market opening plan • preconditions: • bi- or multilateral and multi-annual agreements among operators (traditional cooperation insufficient) (ČD-ÖBB raijet, ČD-DB Prague – Hamburg, ČD-ŽSSK-MÁV- expected) • product approach – guaranteed quality and standardized services (inc. attractive pricing, guaranteed rolling stock, PR, further development of product etc.)

  8. Further Perspective for Freight Services • Rail Freight Corridors • RFC 7 Orient/East-Med • RFC 9 CS Corridor will be part of Rhine – Danube • RFC 5 Baltic-Adriatic – no changes • RFC 8 North Sea-Baltic – link to North Sea ports – CZ initiative • further electrification needed • all lines important for freight • last mile = where necessary for approved operational concept • unification of voltage system – motivation, higher efficiency, coordinated development with SK, TSI ENE (HSR) via Nürnberg – Passau - Wien: DE 15 kV 16,7 Hz AT 15 kV 16,7 Hz HU 25 kV 50 Hz RO 25 kV 50 Hz GB 25 kv 50 Hz RFC7 routing: DE 15 kV 16,7 Hz CZ 3 kV ss/25 kV 50 Hz SK 25 kV 50 Hz HU 25 kV 50 Hz RO 25 kV 50 Hz BG 25 kV 50 Hz • further improvements on TEN-T network (740 m) • some non TEN-T infrastructure in TEN-T parameters expected

  9. Long-term Strategy • development of HS infrastructure and services • HSR as a tool of economic strategy/development (keep good national accessibility) • sufficient capacity for freight

  10. Hamburg – Wien/Budapest Děčín Ústí n. L. Praha • current problems on trunk routes • lack of capacity – same infrastructure for all train segments → need of segregation • not all directions covered – Praha – Wroclaw • low speedparameters → need of new HS/high capacity lines What should be a role of railways in the future? Speed profile after tracks modernization - DE/CZ border - Prague 1916 2016 10

  11. Rapid servicesRS Rapid Services = high-speed project in CZ – 1995 concept update Why? original concept based on TGV experience (different context), need to meet CZ needs and CE spatial context 2012 – more flexible approach – technical and operational solutions: combination of new and modernized lines for higher speeds more segments of trains operated on new infrastructure – maximize accessibility of rail transport possibility of phasing (step by step) gradual speed increase (time slots) – not necessary to buy VHS trains at the beginning of HS operation RS ≠ railway project but economic one RS 11

  12. RS backbone of rail transport • RS for several segments of long-distance and interregional transport: • 1. international (ICE,TGV) • 2. national (express, IC) • 3. interregional (RegioExpress) • basic principles: • part of long-distance transport in CZ = = no exclusive services • interconnection with other modes („exists“ to current network + terminals (integration (train, bus, car, P&R) • accessibility for the whole population (more terminals) • operation (probably) based on franchise model Long distance HS trains Long distance IC trains Suburban HS trains

  13. RSbenefits EXPECTATIONS: radical change in spatial contacts – accessibility change within CZ and EU HS suburban railway – commuting up to 1 hour: shift 60-80km → 150 km HS terminals (RS + regional trains, buses, P+R) = gate to their hinterland capacity increase (issue of urban nodes) elimination of historical pre-conditionalities (e.g. Praha – Brno) – low longitudinal slopes vs. length of lines qualitative shift for sector (Unis, export, know-how) long-term perspective Praha/CEE +RS – time accessibility One Day Trip RS as the tool for increase of public transport attractiveness and better efficiency of public subsidies given to public transport Current and future travel time (half-time realization scenario)

  14. How far we are? • spatial-technical studies (2014 – 17) • detail 1:10 000, covering all technical variants, spatial planning purposes, identification and solving of conflict localities • technical study – defining technical standards • single construction parts (bridges, tunnels…) where Czech norm and legislation is not available • maintenance standards • compatibility of tracks and rolling-stock • feasibility studies: • to be launched in late 2016/early 2017, completion in 1,5 year. • HSL Prague – Dresden • HSL Prague – Brno – border AT/SK • Brno – Přerov (200 km/h) – project phase, construction to be launched in 2019 • EGTC Dresden – Prague

  15. Resumé • modernization of trunk conventional lines close to finalization • new long-lasting development programme needed • to stay well connected is priority – we need to follow neighbouring countries where the system already exists or is going to be developed • chance for employment and national economy competitiveness increase We need to develop railway system for all… i.e. also for those who could use its services already today but there is only a little chance this idea would cross someone’s mind!

  16. Thank for your attention jan.ilik@mdcr.cz

More Related