1 / 14

2004 Cooperative Water Program Task Force Findings

Review of 2004 Task Force findings on USGS Cooperative Water Program progress, funding issues, data collection emphasis, and cooperative relationships.

lfullen
Download Presentation

2004 Cooperative Water Program Task Force Findings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2004 Cooperative Water ProgramTask Force Findings Presented at the Advisory Committee on Water Information January 2006 Barney Austin WSWC

  2. The ‘99 Coop Task Force • Terms of Reference: • To assess the effectiveness of the Cooperative Water Program; • To make recommendations; • Provide a written report of the findings…

  3. Overview of the 2004 Task Force • Review the progress of the USGS in implementing the 59 recommendations of the 1999 Coop TF report. • Findings will help the USGS steer the boat…

  4. 2004 TF Report – Appendix B • USGS response – Agree/disagree • Status – Complete/adopted/implemented… • 2004 TF Priority rating* – High/medium/low • 2004 TF Progress Assessment • USGS Implementation Plan

  5. Chapter III of 2004 TF report • Where the USGS does not fully agree (4) • TF assessment: Insufficient progress (9)

  6. Funding Issues

  7. Funding issues • Cooperators now pick up 68% of the total cost of running the cooperative program • NSIP has not improved the streamgaging situation due to lack of funding • CWP needs in excess of $71M to bring relationship back to 50-50 cost share • NSIP needs $103M for full funding of core network

  8. Edits to report… • Data collection – Interpretive studies balance • To make the best use of limited funds when funding shortfalls occur, the members of the present Task Force believe that the USGS should place emphasis on data collection, rather than interpretive studies. If anything the balance of Federal funds used as match by the USGS has gone the other way, thereby exacerbating an already difficult situation for data collection. It is important that the USGS continue to perform interpretive studies to validate their work, but they need to be careful not to reduce their data collection efforts.

  9. Edits to report… • Role of cooperators • When funding shortfalls occur, it makes sense to examine existing resources available from both the USGS and their Cooperators and make sure they are being used most effectively. Sometimes Cooperators could do more of the actual work with their staff, but have no money to pay the USGS to do the same work. Cooperators have a vested interest in ensuring the highest quality of data and often have a lot of expertise and non-fiscal resources to bring to the table. The USGS should re-examine the use of in-kind service credit and continue to look for ways to foster better working relationships with cooperators.

  10. Edits to report… • Competition with the private sector • The USGS should continue to be extra vigilant in avoiding competition with the private sector. Some basic data collection and dissemination functions are inherently governmental and these duties belong to the USGS. Government oversight and criteria are needed to ensure consistent information is collected in a consistent format. However some studies could realistically be done by the private sector and the USGS needs to make sure that they are not competing unfairly with the private sector in bidding for and conducting this work.

  11. Edits to report… • Fighting for the scraps • …major impediment to implementing the remaining Task Force recommendations. In realizing the need and calling for additional Federal appropriations for the CWP, it should be noted that any new funds secured for the CWP should not come at the expense of water resource, environmental protection, public health protection, or other related programs.

  12. Next steps… • Questions/discussion? • Finalize report?

More Related