480 likes | 497 Views
This workshop outlines the motivation behind client development for perfSONAR, different types of client interaction (Echo, MA, MetadataKeyRequest, SetupDataRequest, LS, XQuery, Discovery), and provides an API tour.
E N D
February 11th 2010, APAN 29 – perfSONAR Workshop Jeff Boote, Assistant Director R&D perfSONAR Client Construction
Outline • Motivation • Types of Client Interaction • Echo • MA • MetadataKeyRequest • SetupDataRequest • LS • XQuery • Discovery • API Tour
Motivation • Development of client applications is crucial to the success of perfSONAR • External applications will consume the measurement data • Researchers will find new users for performance measurements through client applications • Client development requires knowledge of: • Service operation • Framework interaction • Available APIs • Data formats
Types of Client Interaction • There are different types of client interaction • Echo Request • Check the ‘liveness’ of a service • MA Specific Messages • MetadataKeyRequest • Request a replayable ‘key’ to get measurement data • SetupDataRequest • Request measurement data • LS Specific Messages • Xquery • Raw interface to LS databaes – using the XQuery interface • Discovery • Structured discovery queries
Echo Request • The Echo request is a simple message that checks to be sure a service is ‘alive’.
Echo Request • Client must be prepared to: • Communicate with services using SOAP over HTTP • Send a request message to a given service URL • Parse the XML response from the service • Record the results of the Echo • Success in the form of an EchoResponse • Failure in the form of an EchoResponse • Service timeout • Alternate response (anything but an EchoResponse message should be viewed as a failure)
Measurement Archive • The MA derived services have two messages that are interest to client applications: • MetadataKeyRequest • Given a (partial) metadata description, the service will check if this exists in the database • If it does exist, return a replayable ‘key’ to have a fast access to measurement data • SetupDataRequest • Given a (partial) metadata description, the service will check if this exists in the database • If it does exist, return measurement data
Measurement Archive • Each message has the ability to apply what is called a ‘filter’. • Filters are a way to limit the returned data set: • By Time • By Type (e.g. in the case of RRD data select which ‘consolidation function’ is applied) • Filters are applied to a metadata in the message by using the ID fields
Measurement Archive • Different measurement archives will have different metadata formats • SNMP MA • Layer 3 Interface description • perfSONAR BUOY • Endpoint pair (2 Layer 4 hosts) • PingER • Endpoint pair (2 Layer 4 hosts) • Status MA • Layer 3 or Layer 2 Interface description • Consult the protocol and service documentation for specific formats • Your client should be prepared to parse the XML to find useful information
Measurement Archive Requests • Client must be prepared to: • Communicate with services using SOAP over HTTP • Send a request message to a given service URL • Parse the XML response from the service • Be prepared to deal with key elements • Understand the data format of the returned measurement data • In the event of an error: • Interpret a result code from the service • Fail gracefully
Lookup Service • The gLS and hLS have two messages that are interest to client applications: • LSQueryRequest (XQuery Based) • The metadata subject will contain an XQuery statement • The XQuery will be applied to the Lookup database. • The success or failure will be passed back • LSQueryRequest (Discovery Based) • A well formed metadata block will contain items to search for • Domains • Keywords • IP Ranges • Data Types • The summary database will be consulted • A list of services to consult further (either hLSs or services depending if you asked at the gLS or hLS layer) will be returned
API Tour • There are several client APIs available in the perfSONAR-PS packages: • perfSONAR_PS::Client::Echo • Package for performing echo tests against services • perfSONAR_PS::Client::MA • Package for contacting any MA using general calls • perfSONAR_PS::Client::PingER • Package for interacting with PingER servers • perfSONAR_PS::Client::LS • Package for contacting the LS infrastructure, could be used for hLS or gLS • perfSONAR_PS::Client::gLS • Package for contacting the gLS infrastructure, could also be used to contact hLS instances
perfSONAR Client Construction February 11th 2010, APAN 29 – perfSONAR Workshop Jeff Boote, Assistant Director R&D For more information, visit psps.perfsonar.net
perfSONAR_PS::Client::Echo • Module designed to send a simple EchoRequest to a given service • Object Oriented • Built in use of: • SOAP over HTTP transport • XML Parsing • Evaluation of result codes for success or failure • More information available via perldoc
perfSONAR_PS::Client::MA • Module designed to send a generic MetadataKey/SetupData requests to services • Object Oriented • Built in use of: • SOAP over HTTP transport • XML Parsing • Support for error codes • General construction accepts XML for subjects • Requires that clients have knowledge of the service they are contacting • Returns XML (metadata and data) in perl objects • Requires clients to parse out much of the meaning • More information available via perldoc
perfSONAR_PS::Client::PingER • Module designed to send queries to PingER services • Object Oriented • Built in use of: • SOAP over HTTP transport • XML Parsing • Support for error codes • General construction accepts XML for subjects • Returns structured objects that contain data • Used in several GUI applications • More information available via perldoc
perfSONAR_PS::Client::LS • Module designed to query (and perform other operations) on LS type services • Works with gLSs and hLSs • Object Oriented • Built in use of: • SOAP over HTTP transport • XML Parsing • Support for error codes • Main query mechanism is to support arbitrary XQuery statements • Requires knowledge of XQuery to be effective
perfSONAR_PS::Client::gLS • Module designed to query gLSs, namely the discovery component • Will work on the summary set of an hLS also • Object Oriented • Built in use of: • SOAP over HTTP transport • XML Parsing • Support for error codes • Supports both raw (XQuery type) operation as well as discovery queries: • IP Addresses • Domains • Data Types • Keywords
perfSONAR Client Construction February 11th 2010, APAN 29 – perfSONAR Workshop Jeff Boote, Assistant Director R&D For more information, visit psps.perfsonar.net