1 / 29

Summary of Model Performance and Future Year Strategy Results

Summary of Model Performance and Future Year Strategy Results. Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell SAMI Visibility Workshop Knoxville, Tennessee March 8, 2001. Outline. Performance Evaluation Stacked Bar Chart at GSM Performance Statistics Sulfate, Ammonium, Nitrate, Organics, PM 2.5

lilith
Download Presentation

Summary of Model Performance and Future Year Strategy Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summary of Model Performance and Future Year Strategy Results Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell SAMI Visibility Workshop Knoxville, Tennessee March 8, 2001 Georgia Institute of Technology

  2. Outline • Performance Evaluation • Stacked Bar Chart at GSM • Performance Statistics • Sulfate, Ammonium, Nitrate, Organics, PM2.5 • Future Year Simulations • Spatial Plots • Stacked Bar Chart at GSM • Bar Charts at GSM and SHEN • Sulfate, Ammonium, Nitrate, Organics, PM2.5 Georgia Institute of Technology

  3. Performance Evaluation Georgia Institute of Technology

  4. Fine Mass at Great Smoky Mountains Georgia Institute of Technology

  5. Georgia Institute of Technology

  6. Georgia Institute of Technology

  7. Georgia Institute of Technology

  8. Georgia Institute of Technology

  9. Georgia Institute of Technology

  10. Future Year Simulations Georgia Institute of Technology

  11. Sulfate on July 15, 1995 Georgia Institute of Technology

  12. Sulfate on July 31, 1991 Georgia Institute of Technology

  13. Ammonium on July 15, 1995 Georgia Institute of Technology

  14. Ammonium on July 31, 1991 Georgia Institute of Technology

  15. Nitrate on July 15, 1995 Georgia Institute of Technology

  16. Nitrate on July 31, 1991 Georgia Institute of Technology

  17. Nitrate on July 31, 1991 Georgia Institute of Technology

  18. Organics on July 15, 1995 Georgia Institute of Technology

  19. Organics on July 31, 1991 Georgia Institute of Technology

  20. Fine PM on July 15, 1995 Georgia Institute of Technology

  21. Fine PM on July 31, 1991 Georgia Institute of Technology

  22. Fine Mass at Great Smoky Mountains Georgia Institute of Technology

  23. Georgia Institute of Technology

  24. Georgia Institute of Technology

  25. Georgia Institute of Technology

  26. Georgia Institute of Technology

  27. Georgia Institute of Technology

  28. Georgia Institute of Technology

  29. Summary • Performance Evaluation • Sulfate, Ammonium, Organics, and PM2.5 typically show less than 40% Normalized Error • Nitrate shows higher errors due to low concentrations • Future Year Simulations • Spatial concentration gradients differ from day-to-day • Have Completed Two Strategies • 2010 OTW and BWC • 2040 OTW and BWC Georgia Institute of Technology

More Related