1 / 30

Advanced Network Infrastructure Initiatives SURA

Advanced Network Infrastructure Initiatives SURA. Dr. Donald R. Riley Vice President and CIO University of Maryland, College Park November 5, 2002. The Network Development ‘Spiral’. Privatization. Commercialization. Diffusion/ Adoption Process. Today’s Internet.

lilka
Download Presentation

Advanced Network Infrastructure Initiatives SURA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Advanced Network InfrastructureInitiativesSURA Dr. Donald R. Riley Vice President and CIO University of Maryland, College Park November 5, 2002

  2. The Network Development ‘Spiral’ Privatization Commercialization Diffusion/ Adoption Process Today’s Internet Internet2 and ‘NGI’ Operational R&E efforts Research & Experimental Nets Research and Development Partnerships Source: Ivan Moura Campos

  3. Internet2Backbone Networks Internet2 Network Architecture GigaPoP One GigaPoP Two GigaPoP Four GigaPoP Three

  4. University A Internet2 Interconnect Cloud GigaPoP One Regional Network Commercial Internet Connections University C University B Internet2 Network Architecture

  5. 09 January 2002 Sacramento Washington Los Angeles Internet2 Abilene International Peering STAR TAP/Star Light APAN/TransPAC, Ca*net3, CERN, CERnet, FASTnet, GEMnet, IUCC, KOREN/KREONET2, NORDUnet, RNP2, SURFnet, SingAREN, TAnet2 Pacific Wave AARNET, APAN/TransPAC, CA*net3, TANET2 NYCM BELNET, CA*net3, GEANT*, HEANET, JANET, NORDUnet SNVA GEMNET, SINET, SingAREN, WIDE LOSA UNINET OC3-OC12 San Diego (CALREN2) CUDI AMPATH REUNA, RNP2 RETINA (ANSP) El Paso (UACJ-UT El Paso) CUDI * ARNES, CARNET, CESnet, DFN, GRNET, RENATER, RESTENA, SWITCH, HUNGARNET, GARR-B, POL-34, RCCN, RedIRIS

  6. NSF Three Network Model NSF Experimental Network NSF Research Network Abilene Lambda switching Optical packet switching Optical burst switching MEMS, Holography, etc Circuit switches Packet switches IP Routers ATM, Ethernet, etc SONET Packet over SONET Electrical to Optical Conversion Electrical Optical

  7. Recognition of the new requirement of infrastructure to support leading edge science and research Dependence on technology for future scientific advances Cyberinfastructure capabilities include computational power and high speed networks distributed, ad hoc and embedded sensor networks and arrays large data repositories systemic security large-scale interoperability and collaborative tools middleware CyberInfrastructureNSF Blue Ribbon Panel

  8. The “last mile problem” continues and is especially serious for HBCUs, Tribal Colleges and Universities, and Hispanic institutions Research-group and departmental-scale facilities (100 to 1000x less powerful than national centers) are becoming increasingly important; thus, national centers need to be a factor of 100 to 1000x more capable High speed networks with high quality of service continue to be foundational to research and education at all levels On-demand (not pre-scheduled) and instantaneous access is becoming increasingly important (computers, data bases, networks) CyberInfrastructure: Future Infrastructure

  9. Comprehensive environments are needed for linking models from multiple disciplines and for synthesizing results in interoperable frameworks The Computational Grid represents an important opportunity for the future and should receive high priority for support Inexpensive and reliable tools are needed to support distance collaborations Higher levels of security are needed CyberInfrastructure: Future Infrastructure

  10. Grid Computing • Computational Grids are … • are enabling technology that permit the transparent coupling of geographically-dispersed resources (machines, networks, data storage, visualization devices, and scientific instruments) for large-scale distributed applications. • provide several important benefits for users and applications: convenient interfaces to remote resources, resource coupling for resource intensive distributed applications and remote collaboration, and resource sharing. • embody the confluence of high performance parallel computing, distributed computing, and Internet computing, in support of “big science.”

  11. TeraGrid Computing Program • TeraGrid Is… • A collaborative endeavor • a single project with four sites • Argonne, Caltech, NCSA and SDSC • A new model for computational science • distributed, collaborative resources • bootstrapping of a new infrastructure • A production, national service • transition to and support for Grid applications • A collaborative endeavor

  12. NSF’s Distributed Terascale Facility (DTF) Now, plus Pittsburg Supercomputer Center Source: Rick Stevens 12/2001

  13. Need (and ability:-) to provide access to DTF core nodes (as per new DTF-ETF architecture) rj . TeraGrid Backplane StarLight International Optical Peering Point (see www.startap.net) Chicago TeraGrid Backplane St. Louis Indianapolis Urbana Los Angeles Starlight / NW Univ UIC San Diego I-WIRE Multiple Carrier Hubs Ill Inst of Tech ANL OC-48 (2.5 Gb/s, Abilene) Univ of Chicago St Louis GigaPoP Multiple 10 GbE (Qwest) Multiple 10 GbE (I-WIRE Dark Fiber) NCSA/UIUC • Solid lines in place and/or available by October 2001 • Dashed I-WIRE lines planned for Summer 2002 Charlie Catlett – Argonne National Laboratory (catlett@mcs.anl.gov)

  14. Next Wave: State/Regional Optical Networks - and International • UCAID/Internet2 Optical Backbone project • California ONI led by CENIC • Pacific LightRail and Pacific LightWave led by Univ. of Washington and CENIC • Illinois iWire • Indiana I-Light • MAX, SoX, NetVa next gen., NCREN • NoX, Ohio-led multi-state • NSF-sponsored “International Lambda” discussions • HENP Next-generation ESNet deliberations, etc. • Texas? Florida?

  15. TeraGrid Concept ala Illinois

  16. TeraGrid Concept ala U. Washington • Leverage Regional Connections • Incent fatter/dedicated pipes • Enable significant e2e • Connect Scientists/Labs/Devices • Establish MetaPop Centers Critical Mass Sites Top 10 Res. Univ.: Next 15 Res. Univ: Centers, Labs: Intl. 10gig &  Key Hubs draft 12/4/01

  17. e.g. Where the (reachable) Research is Top 251 Research Universities in Total, Federal, Peer Reviewed, Contract and Grant Obligations1[all > $250 million/yr & top few > $500 million/yr] btw – PACIFICLIGHTRAIL alone has 3 of top 5, half of top 10 (& 6 of top 11) Plus major, reachable net oriented centers, labs etc. like LBL etc. and DTF nodes! Johns Hopkins (w/APL) U. of Washington Stanford U. of Michigan UCSD U. of Pennsylvania UCLA MIT Harvard UCSF U. of Colorado (all) Wisconsin Columbia Yale Cornell Minnesota Washington U. Duke UNC UCB Pittsburg Penn State USC Cal. Tech Illinois 1. Variations in how to count and financial period causes minor variations in order and inclusion at bottom end 2. Obligations lag Awards – the list of Awards is almost identical but numbers are higher draft 11/12/01

  18. DREN Abilene VBNS ESNet NREN SuperNet NISN ISP ATDNet MAX Regional Infrastructure Net.Work.Va Net.Work.Md UMBC GSFC UMCP GU GWU NLM USM HHMI NSF SURA NOAA NIH NCSA SMTH UCDC CU ETC UCAID CENS Mid-Atlantic Crossroads (concept) National/International Peering Networks Regional Network Participants NGIX-East Institutional Participants

  19. JETnets Interconnections and Peering Seattle Abilene DREN @Gig-E @Gig-E Sunnyvale Abilene ESnet @OC12 @OC12 NGIX-SF (Ames) Abilene vBNS @OC12 @OC3 NREN DREN @OC3 @OC12 ESnet NISN @OC3 @OC3 SDSC FIX/MAE-West (Ames) vBNS @OC12 NREN DREN @OC3 @OC3 ESnet NISN ESnet @DS3 @OC3 @DS3 peering in place NGIX peering planned Public Exchange Point JETnet : connected to the exchange point Private Exchange Point JETnet : plan to connect to the exchange point Sprint NY-NAP NGIX-CH (AADS) MCIW-PYM vBNS vBNS vBNS Abilene @OC12 @OC3 @DS3 @OC12 NREN DREN DREN @OC3 @OC3 @OC3 ESnet NISN ESnet NISN ESnet NISN @OC3 @OC3 @OC3 @OC3 @DS3 @DS3 NGIX-DC/MAX Abilene vBNS DREN @OC12 @OC3 @OC12 ESnet NREN @OC3 @OC12 NISN NLM @OC3 @OC12 SuperNet MAX USGS @OC48 @OC48 @250Mb MAE-East LA vBNS Abilene @DS3 @OC48 DREN @OC3 ESnet NISN Supernet @DS3 @DS3 @OC48 Created by Javad Boroumand, updated 24 AUG 01 by JJ Jamison

  20. MAX – ATDnet Cooperative Project • ATDnet (Advanced Technology Demonstration Network) is a high performance networkinig testbed • Established by DARPA • Enables collaboration between defense and other fereral agencies • ATDnet comprised of federal research labs + MAX • NRL, DIA, DISA, LTS, NASA, DARPA, MAX • MAX managing a research testbed network in collaboration with ADTnet • MAX participants eligible to submit network experiment proposals to ATDnet

  21. SURA Opportunities:Southeastern University Research Association • SURA Goals: Strengthen research capacity of Southeastern U.S. universities and ability to attract federal R&D funding • 501(c)3 consortium of 59 research universities from 16 southeastern US states and DC • Founded in 1980 to develop Jefferson Lab, a DOE-funded high energy physics facility • Created one of the first NSF funded regional network services, SURANet; sold in 1995 to BBN • Major initiatives • Jefferson Lab • Regional Infrastructure Initiative (Crossroads) • SCOOP - SURA Coastal Ocean Observing Program • …. • Increasing support of So. Governors Association

  22. SURA Regional Infrastructure Initiative: Potential Telecom & Utility Company Partnership

  23. SURA-led National Buyers Consortium • Goal: National fiber infrastructure owned by R&E community

  24. SURA-led National Buyers Consortium • Goal: National fiber infrastructure owned by R&E community

  25. National LightRail: cost-effective owned lit R&E fiber fabric Initial footprint 3/03 Leading-Edge e2e services & experimental network facilitiesvia MetaPoPs and inter-gigapop linksfor research & next gen. tech., arch., grids, DTF expansion, content, sensors, apparatus … Up to 40 dedicated 10 gigabit waves with up to hundreds of dedicated gigabit links system-wide. Canarie fabric SEA 10 gbs Tycom IEEAF donation BOS CLV? CHI 10 gbs Tycom IEEAF Donation NY SUN PIT DC DEN Raleigh? LA ATL MetaPoPs & Core Nodes ADM sites Desired Expansion PoPs/ADM National LightRail” (NLR) International Broadband Metro/WAN owned Fiber ‘Rings' connecting strategic R&E endpoints. 8/14/02

  26. Lit National NLR Core Fabric Fiber 11,000 miles 9,342 miles 5,207 miles A. B. C. D. 7-28-02 ronj

  27. National Fiber Initiative • National Light Rail • UCAID Board Resolution: “National Fiber Opportunity Project” • SURA-UCAID-National Buyers Consortium: AT&T Opportunity

  28. SURA-SGA Opportunities • Leverage • MAX, SoX, NetVa, NCREN and other state/regional initiatives • federal labs and initiatives • National R&E networking initiatives • Position SURA and region for evolving national and international initiatives • Develop multi-purpose, multi-sector network to leverage investments, create infrastructure • New opportunities for leadership role, including economic development opportunities • Invest for the future

More Related