1 / 44

IIIG LTMS V2 Review

IIIG LTMS V2 Review. LTMS V2 Review. Data Summary: Includes 285 Chartable reference oil results from all test laboratories Most recent chartable reference oil result included in data set is March 22, 2010 Includes all ACLW data that is currently exhibiting a mild trend

Download Presentation

IIIG LTMS V2 Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IIIG LTMS V2 Review

  2. LTMS V2 Review • Data Summary: • Includes 285 Chartable reference oil results from all test laboratories • Most recent chartable reference oil result included in data set is March 22, 2010 • Includes all ACLW data that is currently exhibiting a mild trend • All parameters (WPD, ACLW, & PVIS) are classified as “Primary”

  3. LTMS V2 Review • Proposed Limits for IIIG LTMS v2 example: • Limits for ei & zi:

  4. Invalid & Shortened Reference Periods • Current Unacceptable: • If Yi > 2 and SA = 0 (Re-Reference required) • If Yi < -2 and SA = 0 (Re-Reference required) • If |Yi| > 3 (Re-Reference required) • Current Shortened Reference Period: • If Yi > 2 and SA > 0 (18 candidates/reference) • If Yi < -2 and SA < 0 (18 candidates/reference)

  5. Invalid & Shortened Reference Periods • Proposed: • If |ei| > 2.055 (Re-Reference required) & UI check • If |Yi – Yi+1|> 2.055 then apply undue influence constraint (Yi is adjusted such that ei = 2.055) • If |ei| > 1.73 (Shortened Reference Period 80%)

  6. Extended Reference Periods • Extended Reference Period (Proposed): • If |ei| < 0.5 and previous test was acceptable, then extend 20% • If |ei|< 0.5 and |zi|< 0.5 and previous test was acceptable, then extend by 40%

  7. IIIG calibration attempt summary: • Of the 289 total, 73.3% acceptable, 17.3% failed acceptance, and 9.4% were invalid

  8. IIIG Alarm Summary (all labs & chartable results): • Below summarizes the unacceptable, reduced, and extended reference interval count for LTMS v1 & v2.

  9. IIIG Alarm Summary (all labs & chartable results): • Below summarizes the unacceptable, reduced, and extended reference interval percentage for LTMS v1 & v2.

  10. IIIG Alarm Summary (by lab): • Below summarizes the unacceptable, reduced, and extended reference interval count for LTMS v1 & v2 by test lab (285 Chartable test results).

  11. IIIG RMSE for the PVIS parameter: • RMSE calculation is a function of the average deviation from the target and within lab variation.

  12. IIIG Relative Pass limit of a Candidate test for the PVIS parameter:

  13. IIIG RMSE for the WPD parameter: • RMSE calculation is a function of the average deviation from the target and within lab variation.

  14. IIIG Relative Pass limit of a Candidate test for the WPD parameter (with a [GF-4] 3.5 limit):

  15. IIIG RMSE for the ACLW parameter: • RMSE calculation is a function of the average deviation from target and within lab variation.

  16. IIIG Relative Pass limit of a Candidate test for the ACLW parameter:

  17. Undue Influence example for TPVIS (ei) data • Plot of ei data with no Undue Influence adjustment

  18. Undue Influence example for TPVIS (ei) data • Circled results with “capped” adjustment (at +2.066 limit) • Result adjusted if |Yi – Zi-1| > 2.066 and |Yi – Yi+1| > 2.066

  19. Undue Influence “Capped” Result Summary:

  20. AppendixLTMS V2 Charts By Test Lab

  21. Lab A

  22. Lab B

  23. Lab D

  24. Lab E

  25. Lab F

  26. Lab G

More Related