1 / 26

Structure and dynamics of earth’s lower mantle

Structure and dynamics of earth’s lower mantle. Edward J. Garnero and Allen K. McNamara. Presented by : David de Vlieg Folkert van Straaten. R esearch on lower most mantle :. This part of the mantle has influence on the convection and chemistry of the entire mantle

lily
Download Presentation

Structure and dynamics of earth’s lower mantle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Structureanddynamics of earth’slowermantle Edward J. Garnero and Allen K. McNamara Presentedby: David de Vlieg Folkert van Straaten

  2. Research on lower most mantle: • This part of the mantle has influence on the convectionandchemistry of the entiremantle • It playsan important role in the heat release of the core • It has influence on thermalstructureandevolution of the earth

  3. Keyscientificareastostudy the lowermantle • Seismology • Mineralphysics • Geodynamics • Geochemistry • to get a betterinsightintothe lowermantle, it is important to combine these areas

  4. Different theoriestoexplain the lowermantleanomalies • Anomalies are causedby a • Temperature effect • Chemical effect • It is verydifficulttodeterminehow important each effect is andhowtheyinfluenceeachother • During the remainder of the presentation we focus on the different theoriesexplaining the properties of the lowermantle

  5. Historicalperspectivelowermost mantle research • Discovery of a reducedseismicvelocitygradient as function of depth • This was interpreted as a lower most mantlethermalboundarylayerabove a hot core • 1980’s:seismologistsalsoobserved a first order discontinousincrease in velocitybetween 250 km and 350 km above the core-mantleboundary (CMB) • This was named the D” discontinuity

  6. Anomalies in shearvelocity Lowershearvelocity Highershearvelocity

  7. The D” discontinuity • D’’discontinuity does not have a specificstructuralcharacteristic, but is more a generaldepth shell of a few hundred kilometers • It shows a connectionwithsubductionand Hot spot regionsaboveit • Thiscanbeused as an argument fortotalmantleconvection • Convergent plate boundaries overlie D″ regions with higher than average velocities • hot-spot volcanoes overlie D″ regions with lower than average velocities. • combinedwithevidencefor high P- and S-wave velocities mimicking subduction slab shapes

  8. The LLSVP’s (large low-shear-velocity province’s) • Below Africaand the Pacific regionstwobroadregions of lowershearvelocityandhigherthanaveragedensityare observed • Africanregion is ca. 15000 km acrossand 1000 km high • Pacific region is ca. 15000 km acrossand 500 km high • Both show sharpedgeswithnormalmantle

  9. What are these LLSVP’s? • No agreement • Geodynamical view: Higherdensitymaterialwill go toupwellingregionsbyconvection • LLSVP’s have stabledensities • Too low densitywillcausebuoyancy • Too high densitywill flat out or even let the structuresdisappear

  10. Other way to look at LLSVP’s • Thermochemical view: LLSVP’s are in essence superplumes in different stadia, anddueto a thermochemicalbalanceverystable • thermochemicalsuperplumesmay heat up and rise because of excessthermal buoyancy • then cool and sink due to decreasedthermalbuoyancy • Smaller plumeswith the densermaterialcan form at the top of these structures

  11. MantlePiles • Mantlepiles are pileswithspecificchemicalproperties • They are accumulated in the Pacific andAfricanregion, which are dominant upwelling centers • Piles are passivelysweptandshapedbymantleconvection • Plumesmaybeoriginatefrompile tops, in particular at peaksandridges

  12. Causes of thislower-mantlechemicalheterogeneity • Lowermantleheterogeneitycouldbeexplainedby: • remnants of primordialmaterial • the result of chemicalreactionproductsfrom the CMB • remnants of subductedoceanicmaterial

  13. A way torecognise the chemicalproperties of a pile • Pilescomposedof a long-lived primordial layer will likely have sharp contacts at their top surface • Piles composed of accumulated subductedmaterial may have a rough or diffusive top

  14. Chemistry of llsvp’s • Volcanic hot spots tend to overlie LLSVP edges rather than their interiors • consistent withedgesandridges of thermochemical piles forming in regions of return flow and initiating plumes • This is stillcontroversial • Becausenumericalmodels of mantle convection show that plume morphologies are often more complicated than simple verticallycontinuouswhole-mantleconduits • Further geochemical research on ocean island basalts (OIB’s) is necessary

  15. Cause of D” discontinuity • Lateral variations in deep-mantletemperatureare expected but should be smooth • hence they do not explain a step velocity increase • D″ has interpreted as chemical dregs from subduction, • as a region of chemical reaction between the core and mantle, • Today most preferred: as a boundary between isotropic and anisotropic fabrics, or as a solid-state phase change

  16. D” discontinuityandchemicalproperties of LLSVP”s (1) • D’’-discountinuitycouldbe the result of the transitionfromperovskiteinto post-perovskite • Thistransitions has a positiveClapeyron curve • Sowhentemperatureincreases the pressureneededfor the transition must behigher

  17. Double crossing Perovskite, Post-Perovskite From: Ferroir

  18. D” discontinuityandchemicalproperties of LLSVP”s(2) • Due to this positive Clapeyron relation the discontinuity should deepen or even vanish in hot area’s • Near the core double crossing • This is not the case: Clear evidence is present for an S-wave discontinuity within the Pacific LLSVP • Prooffor a different chemicalcomposition! (maybehigheriron content)

  19. D” discontinuityandchemicalproperties of LLSVP”s(3) • Perovskiteto Post perovskite: exothermicreaction • Resulting in Plume formation • Higherconvection leads tolowertemperatures • Lowertemperaturesreaction

  20. D” discontinuityandchemicalproperties of LLSVP”s(4) • Todeterminewhich of the possibilities is the most probableyouneedtomeasure the discontinuitiesperfectly • Measuringanisotropyusinghorizontalandverticalcomponents of shear waves is a way to do this

  21. Anisotropyandmeasuring the D’’ discontinuity (1) • If the D’’ anisotropy is the result of the change fromperovskiteinto post perovskitean offset of depthbetween the onset of the anomalyand the discontinuity is expected • This is because the preferredlatticeorientation is onlyvisibleafter a sufficientamount of deformation

  22. Anisotropyandmeasuring the D’’ discontinuity(2) • mayexplainseismic observations under the central Atlantic which thought to be away from current downwellings • which there is evidence for a D″ discontinuity • but a weak seismic anisotropy

  23. Ultra-low velocity zones (1) • Directly above the CMB • 5 to 40 km thickthin patches in which P- and S-wave velocities are reduced by up to 10% and 30%, respectively • Partialmeltand a densityincrease up to 10%

  24. Ultra-low velocity zones (2) These ULVZ’scanbeusedto say somethingaboutLLSVP’s: • If the most lowermantle has anisochemicalcompositionULVZ’sshouldbe the thickest in the middle of a LLSVP (hottestregion) • If a LLSVP has a thermochemicalstructure the hottestregionsshouldbe at theiredgesandULVZ’sshouldbe the thickesthere

  25. Ultra-low velocity zones (3) • Most proofthatllsvp’s have a thermochemicalstructureinstead of a isochemicalstructure

  26. Thankyouforlistening • Are therestillquestions?

More Related