110 likes | 243 Views
TOPOFF 2 (T2) July 2002 - May 2003. Department of Justice, Office of Domestic Preparedness Department of State. T2 Program Overview. Objectives: Test preparedness and practice WMD response on a nation-wide basis
E N D
TOPOFF 2 (T2)July 2002 - May 2003 Department of Justice, Office of Domestic PreparednessDepartment of State
T2 Program Overview Objectives: • Test preparedness and practice WMD response on a nation-wide basis • Involve every decision making level, from U.S. government top officials to local first responders • Highlight domestic and international issues related to catastrophic incident Benefits: • Improve capabilities to respond in a multi-agency, multi-jurisdictional environment • Obtain independent validation of each agency’s priorities and needs
TOPOFF 2000 – May 2000 • Top Officials (TOPOFF) 2000 was a single full-scale exercise conducted over ten days in May in three metropolitan areas: • Denver, CO: Bioterrorism attack (Pneumonic plague). • Portsmouth, NH: Chemical attack (Sulfur mustard). • National Capital Region: NCR 2000, concurrent but separate exercise (Radiological dispersal device). • TOPOFF 2000 involved over 6,000 participants, including U.S. Government cabinet officials
T2 - Design Overview • T2 scenario theme: • Terrorist WMD attacks • Multiple sites in the continental U.S. • Venue 1: Seattle, surrounding counties, and the State of Washington • Radiological Dispersion Device (RDD) in Seattle, various smaller hazardous materials incidents, and plague victims from Chicago • Venue 2: Chicago, surrounding counties, and the State of Illinois • A biological (Pneumonic plague) attack originating from Canada • National Capitol Region • Reactions by top officials to attacks and threats of additional attacks • Includes both crisis management & consequence management events • T2 Concept: • Building block approach • Flexible, dynamic, and designed to benefit the widest audience • Venue involvement in each phase of T2 development
T2 - Design Overview • T2 will employ a cycle of exercise activity that increases in complexity and culminates in a full-scale exercise in May 2003 • Seminars, a large-scale game, and a full-scale exercise will focus on acute response issues; a command post and distributed network exercise will focus on longer term recovery issues • The full-scale exercise will be a limited notice, rather than a no-notice exercise
T2 - Cycle of Activity Full-Scale Exercise MAY 03 APR 03 Top Officials Seminar FEB 03 Advanced Distance Learning Exercise (ADLE) DEC 02 Performance-based full-scale exercise Large- Scale Game JUL 02 – FEB 03 Top Officials preparation for Full-Scale Exercise Seminars Addresses acute response issues; uses distance learning methodologies to reach nationwide audience Address acute response issues Addresses intermediate & long-term consequences, remediation & recovery
Opportunities for Participants • Test and evaluate WMD plans, policies, and procedures • Improve interagency coordination and communications • Clarify roles and responsibilities at all levels • Conduct individual and group crisis and consequence management WMD training • Identify and validate: • Proposed adjustments to plans, policies, and procedures • Resource requirements and shortfalls
Seattle Venue • Detonation of a Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) south of downtown core at noon on Monday, May 12th • Ammonium nitrate/fuel oil (ANFO) explosive device with Plutonium 238/239, Cesium 137, and oxidized Americium 241 in a delivery truck • Field play will continue for first 36 straight hours • Take-down of terrorist safehouse • Cases of plague from Chicago • Attempts by terrorist to flee across international border
Roles for Federal Responders - Seattle Venue • Support to local, state, and other federal responders upon their request • Provide staffing for FEMA Regional Operations Center (ROC), FBI Joint Operations Center (JOC), state/local Emergency Operations Centers (EOC), Joint Information Centers (JICs), and field sampling teams, as necessary • Provide accurate information to other responders regarding agency role, responsibilities, and capabilities • Help educate responders and the public on the risks from radionuclides and appropriate protective action measures
Role for EPA and RRT 10 - Seattle Venue • EPA’s initial response will be under the National Contingency Plan • Field teams will be immediately dispatched to support the local response in identification of source materials and extent of contamination • Consistent with EPA’s National Approach to Response, EPA will stand up an internal Area Command and begin requesting back-up resources • EPA will rely on RRT 10 for communications and coordination with traditional response partners • Following transition to a Federal Response Plan activation, EPA and USCG will Co-Chair ESF 10 (Hazardous Materials) and will use either FRP and/or RRT networks for communication and coordination with response partners
EPA Resources to be Utilized - Seattle Venue • Approximately 20 OSCs • Including R8 and R9 backup resources • Regional Health Physicists • 15 - 20 technical support contractors • Limited support from EPA’s Radiological Emergency Response Team (RERT) • EPA’s Environmental Response Team - West • EPA Region 10 Regional Incident Coordination Team (RICT)