340 likes | 552 Views
Systems Change. Susan S. Jakes, Ph.D. Systems Change. Understanding Systems Theory How systems affect our work Systems thinking Defining systems to create change Identifying key levers: Making change pervasive and powerful Predicting roadblocks Keys to success. Systems.
E N D
Systems Change Susan S. Jakes, Ph.D. Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Systems Change • Understanding Systems Theory • How systems affect our work • Systems thinking • Defining systems to create change • Identifying key levers: Making change pervasive and powerful • Predicting roadblocks • Keys to success Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Systems • Nothing happens in a vacuum • Domino effect • The band-aid approach Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Systems, What Are They? • Regularly interacting or interrelated groups of individuals, activities, organizations and their social and physical environment • Parts connected by a web of relationships acting as a whole Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
System Qualities • Interdependence • Feedback + Homeostasis = adaptive • Dynamic processes, not static • Maintain the status quo Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Notes from previous slide • Feedback + Homeostasis = adaptive • Dynamic processes, not static • Maintain the status quo • Whole is greater than the sum of its parts – A system is interdependent. This means that a change in one part creates ripple effect across all of its relationships. When I was a child, I first got interested in systems upon reading a Ray Bradbury short story in which some people go back in time and get off the path that will keep them from affecting anything and this little boy steps on a butterfly and when he comes back to current time, everything is different. • Systems maintain homeostasis. Homeostasis is the property which regulates the internal environment so as to maintain a stable, constant condition. So this means when there are changes in the environment, feedback in received, and organisms adjust to maintain stability – this is adaptation. • Systems are never static, as little changes happen they are always dynamically responding. Through all of these processes, the nature of systems is to maintain the status quo. Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
The Nature of Systems • Open and closed systems • Organismic versus mechanistic Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Notes from previous slide • An open system is impacted by elements in its environment – a closed system is not, it is completely bounded. Closed systems are really just theoretical, but any system is open to some influences and closed to others. • Systems thinking resulted from a shift in thinking mechanistically to organismically. Mechanistic thinking is a reductionist approach that tries to understand how things work as a machine. It tries to break things into parts and understand them as a way to understand the whole function. This is the primary way program planning and evaluation is still conceptualized. • Organismic thinking seeks to understand processes or systems as organisms. If you know my muscles and vessels and how they work and my bones etc, you could add them up and never expect the creative and spiritual being that are humans. There is a whole that is an entity totally different than the sum of its parts and must be understood as an entity. For systems thinkers, they see systems as entities that must be understood separately from their parts. Think of a community in a small town. It is a system of relationships, its natural resources, culture, lore, human capital, infrastructure, past experiences etc. • It is alive and dynamic. Any event or change causes ripples across the system. Does anyone have an example from a community in which they work or live? Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
But What Does It All Mean? = + + Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Reality Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Types of Change • Episodic versus continuous • Incremental – first order change • Radical – second order change Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
“A change in a system level outcome is not the same as, nor does it guarantee, systems change” (Foster-Fishman & Behrens, 2007) Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Systems change is a change to the interaction between the parts rather than to the parts themselves. Changes to individual parts only create change in their ability to leverage change in other parts. These interactions need to be the focus of our intervention… Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Systems Thinking • A general conceptual orientation concerned with the interrelationships between parts and their relationships to a functioning whole (Trochim, Cabrera, Millstein, Gallagher & Leischow, 2006) Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Tipping Points • What are some changes that have become quickly widespread you’ve observed in your lifetime? Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Mental Models • Change is behavioral • Begins at the individual level • Requires a change in thinking, more than knowledge and skills Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Discourse • Method of creating new mental models • Key stakeholders Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Functional systems thinking OBESE PERSON family work community Society/ policy Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Boundaries (Foster-Fishman 2007) • How the problem is defined • Who and what should be considered as part of the system • Don’t forget to consider interactions as elements • Often need to be expanded • Need to be examined and negotiated with stakeholders Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Taking action Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Levers for Change • Lever is what creates movement or change • Levers need to trigger change in multiple layers of the system indiv indiv family Powerful lever policy work Weak Lever policy Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Identifying Levers • Defining the problem • Bring stakeholders to the table to outline various perspectives on problem • Stakeholders also identify various root causes of the problem and patterns of independence • Analyze • Compile problem definitions and interdependent systems • Identify key leverage points that can result in second order change Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Some Issues to Understand:(Foster-Fishman, Nowell & Yang, 2007, P. 206) • System norms • System resources • System regulation • Power and decision making Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Notes from previous page • Norms: what are current assumptions, values, theories in use that guide the ways things work? • Resources: do system members have skills and knowledge to function in new system? • Are there champions for change? • How are relationships maintaining the current system or seeking change? • What needs cause resource allocation currently, are there resources to meet new or competing needs? • Regulations: What policy and procedures exacerbate the problem, which would have to be changed, 3which support change? • Power and DM: who has authority to make change? Who controls resources and information needed? • Do movers and shakers support or hinder change? • The answers to these questions can be put into a spreadsheet or onto a visual representation of the system. The goal here is to expand your thinking of the system, what maintains the status quo and where there might be potentials to create change Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Identifying Levers(Foster-Fishman, Nowell & Yang, 2007, p. 206) • What system elements seem inconsistent with the goal? • Which parts or interactions could trigger system wide changes? • What triggers can actually be leveraged given resources and understandings? Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Leveraging Change Con’t(Foster-Fishman, Nowell & Yang, 2007, p. 206) • What impact will leveraging one part or interaction have on other parts of the system? • What enduring patterns will impede change, how will they be overcome? • “What linkages between system parts could be created or altered to align system functioning with the system change goals” Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Predicting Roadblocks • Hidden power structures • Investment in the status quo • Finding a third way Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Keys to Success • Multiple worldviews may help transform thinking about the system • Understanding the root cause • Change the interrelationships, not any single system component Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
What have been your experiences with systems change? Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Key resource • Special issue on Systems Change American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol 39, 3-4 June 2007 Susan S. Jakes - NCSU
Susan Scherffius Jakessusan_jakes@ncsu.edu Susan S. Jakes - NCSU