220 likes | 482 Views
Rethinking School Feeding in WFP. Locally sourced school feeding, Purchase For Progress and Education of Rural People. WHY SCHOOL FEEDING?. WFP’s Vision: HUNGER NOT AN IMPEDIMENT TO EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL CHILD School feeding is a long-term , sustainable investment in human capital.
E N D
Rethinking School Feeding in WFP Locally sourced school feeding, Purchase For Progress and Education of Rural People
WHY SCHOOL FEEDING? • WFP’s Vision: • HUNGER NOT AN IMPEDIMENT TO EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL CHILD School feeding is a long-term, sustainable investment in human capital
SCHOOL FEEDING IS… A relevant response to hunger in all contexts; An effective safety net providing education, nutrition and other development benefits A cost-effective, sustainable intervention 1. 2. 3. 3
SCHOOL FEEDING IS… Mainly targeted to RURAL AREAS A hunger reduction tool – response to High Food Prices crisis in 20 countries Modalities: school snacks, school meals, Take-Home rations 4. 5. 6. 4
School Feeding Outcomes Income Transfer • SF is a scaleable, effective social protection instrument, most effective as a safety net when it targets poorest areas Education • SF can help to get children into school and help to keep them there and help them learn. Gender • Proven positive contribution of school feeding to gender equality • When SF rations are combined with de-worming and micronutrient fortification they offer important nutritional benefits Nutrition Local Development • Spin offs- linkages to community development, local production, health and nutrition/ essential package interventions 5
THE TRANSITION OF SCHOOL FEEDING WFP’s role is to support the transition process
The six quality standards for sustainable school feeding • Sound alignment with national policy frameworks; • Stable funding and budgeting; • Evidence-based programme design; • Strong institutional and implementation arrangements; • Strong partnerships and inter-sector coordination • Strong community participation and ownership.
The role of WFP is to assist the government in thoses areas: • Policy: dialogue, advocacy, decision-making • Institutional: capacity analyses, capacity development • Funding: food aid and fundraising • Programme design: appraisal, evaluation, costing, targeting, food basket and nutrition considerations. • Programme implementation: procurement, logistics, M&E • Process starts with action planning workshops (tool)
New Policy & Strategy Directions WFP’s role New Generation School Feeding • Focus on Government ownership, capacity building • WFP to support transition into nationally-owned programmes. • SF sustainable when included in national policy framework, the country has financial AND institutional capacity • WFP to enable national governments to design, implement and expand comprehensive, government-owned,locally sourced, cost-effective and sustainable quality School Feeding Programmes 9
Where did WFP purchase in 2008? Europe 557,163 mt US$ 220 million North America 221,289 mt US$ 99 million Asia 846,148 mt US$ 424 million Africa 1,024,255 mt US$ 427 million Latin America 185,812 mt US$ 236 million Map from Nations Online Project 78% of all food purchased was from developing countries
SMALL FARMER LINKS TO SCHOOL FEEDING requires Strategic procurement:for school feeding programme, from small-scale farmers removing the barriers in accessing the school feeding market, Agricultural development:help small-scale farmers increase productivity, produce better-quality crops, manage natural resources and mitigate risks in a sustainable way. Institutional development:support for design and implementation includes policies, standards, capacity building to fund, manage and implement school feeding 1. 2. 3. 13
PURCHASE FOR PROGRESS OBJECTIVES • Identify and share best practices for agriculture markets stakeholders to increase profitable engagement in markets • Improve capacities in order to raise income from agriculture markets • Increase farmers’ sales to WFP • Transform WFP food purchase programmes P4P focuses on smallholder and low-income farmers
Activities • Competitive tendering practices • Purchasing directly • Contracting for risk reduction • Processing options Cross-cutting activities: Partnerships & Training; Monitoring and Evaluation; Policy Advice & Advocacy
Countries that are advanced in the transition to national ownership (Africa)
Next steps • USDA missions in four countries: Ghana, Kenya, Mali and Uganda in partnership with WFP/GATES • These missions will assess and establish a clear link between home-grown school feeding, P4P, new generation school feeding
Three Fundamental Components Building Blocks Market Interventions Monitoring & Evaluation Procurement Ongoing M&E Supply-side Partnerships
Traders & Processors UN Agencies & World Bank Bilateral Partners Farmers & Communities NGOs Donors Regional Organisations ResearchInstitutions National Governments
21 Pilot Countries • Africa:Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia • Asia:Afghanistan and Laos • Latin America:El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua