240 likes | 538 Views
v s. A SHORT OVERVIEW OF THE LONG STORY by Lukáš Lorenc,. History. … Testimony of Robert Schwarz in Anheuser-Busch v. DuBois brewery case in 1947: Q : “ How long have there been breweries in Budweis for ?“
E N D
vs. A SHORT OVERVIEW OF THE LONG STORY by Lukáš Lorenc,
History …Testimonyof Robert Schwarz in Anheuser-Busch v. DuBoisbrewerycase in 1947: • Q: “How long havetherebeenbreweries in Budweisfor?“ • A: “Oh, forhundredsofyears. Earliestrecord I knowofgoesbackabout 1200 or 1300.“ • Q: “And how long has Budweiser beer beenknown as a beer made in Budweis?“ • A: “Eversincetheystartedbrewingthere.“
Budweis • 1265 - foundation of the town of Budweis • Rightsgrantedto the town by the king: • brewing right - right ofcitizens to brew, malt and sell beer in their houses • right of mile -no breweries,pubs and malt houses within 1 old mile (approx. 10 kms) awayfromthetown • Such a „monopoly“ causedthatbeers fromdiferrenttowns had special and uniquefeatures and were calledaccording to the place of theirorigin: • Budweis(Budějovice) ….Budweiser Bier(Budějovicképivo) • Pilsen (Plzeň) …………… Pilsner Bier/Plzeňsképivo
19‘th century – localbeerbreweresassociate in „industrialbreweries“ • 1895 – Czech brewers in Budweisestablished „Czech Joint-Stock Brewery“ and continuein brewingbased on traditionalbeer production methods and the reputation of „BudweiserBier“ • 1967 – Budweiser Budvar NationalCorporationtookovertheheritageofthe Czech Joint-Stock Brewery and continue in more than700yearsoldtraditionofbrewing„BudweiserBier“
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. and BUDWEISER • TestimonyofAdolphus Busch in Anheuser-Busch v. Fred Miller BrewingCompany Case, April 26, 1894: • “The idea wassimply to brewbeersimilarin quality, color, flavor and taste to beerthen made atBudweis, or in Bohemia.“ • “The Budweiser beerisbrewedaccording to the Budweiser Bohemian process.“ • TestimonyofAdolphus Busch in C.Conradv J.UhrigBrewing Co. Case, 1878: • „Theprocess I havedescribedistheprocess by whichbeeris made in Budweis to my bestknowledge. Theknowledge I have in regard to that I haveobtainedfrombooks and frompeoplethathaveworkedthere.“
1907 – US Trade Mark Registration No. 64125 for „Budweiser“ in thenameof Anheuser-Busch BrewingAssociation • Czech Joint-StockBrewery use „Budweiser“ as geographicaldenomination, togetherwithadjective „Original“ • 1935 – Czechoslovak TM Registration No. 113071 for „Budweiser Beer“ in thenameof Czech Joint-StockBrewery
Summary • Anheuser-Busch admitted that they wanted to imitate quality and character of beer brewed originally in the city of Budweis • „Budweiser“ cannot be a word devised by Anheuser-Busch, the company tries to claim at present in disputes with Budweiser Budvar N.C.
HistoricalAgreements • 1911 : Czech Joint-StockBrewery use „Budweiser“ as geographicaldenominationwithadjective „Original“ allaroundtheworld. Anheuser-Busch use Trade Mark Budweiser in allcountriesoutsideEurope. Anheuser-Busch pay Czech Joint-StockBreweryfinancialcompensationfortheagreement.
HistoricalAgreements • 1939 : Czech Joint-StockBrewerywaivetheirrights to use BUDWEISER and BUD on territoryoftheNorthAmericancontinent (anywherenorthof Panama Channel). Concludedunderthethreatofconfiscationofgoods in theUSA and offinanciallydemandingcourtcases.
Great Britain • 1979 – 1984 Court of Appeal upheld the right of both companies to use Budweiser mark • 1979 – 2000 Court of Appeal upheld the right of both companies AB toregister Budweiseras a trademark • 2005 – ? Application for Invalidation of BUDWEISER Trade Mark of Budweiser Budvar; preliminary ruling of ECJ dated 3 Feb. 2011, Case C- 482/09
Germany • 1996 – 1997 preliminary injunctions issuedagainst importer ofAnheuser-Busch • 1997 – 2000 20 successful preliminary injunctions issued on requestof Budweiser Budvar and prohibiting use ofpromotional materialswith Budweiser. • 2000 decisionagainst Anheuser-Busch not to infringerights of Budweiser Budvar by means of TV advertising in German speaking countries • 2001 Anheuser-Busch win two lawsuits in Cologne concerning TV and Internet advertising (no breachofthewrittenundertaking on non-infringementissued by Anheuser-Busch in favourof Budweiser Budvar) • 2001anotherdecision in favourof Budweiser BudvaraboutBudweiser trademark
Italy • 1998 cancellation of Budweiser, Budweiser Budbrau, Budweiser Budvar, Budiwoyz and Bud trademarks of Budweiser Budvar and appellations oforigin • 2001 confirmation of cancellation of trade marks except one; case before the Supreme Court • 2002 Supreme Court suspended enforceablity of previous decision • 2001 Anheuser-Busch succesfully request preliminary injunction prohibiting importers from sale of Budweiser Budvar products under valid TMs
2011 Court of Appeal in Milan completely reversed previous decisions, rejected claims of Anheuser-Busch and declare BUDWEISER Trade Mark of Anheuser-Busch as being deceptive • 2011 - ? appeal pending before the Supreme Court
Development ofarguments in time • 1997Finland: “Budějovický is translation of Anheuser-Busch trademarkBudweiser.” • 1998New Zealand: “Budějovický Budvar is translation of Anheuser- Busch renowned trademark Budweiser.” • 2001Japan: “TrademarkBudějovický Budvar came into being by Budějovický Budvaradding the suffixes -ějovickýand-varto Anheuser-Buschrenowned trademark BUD.”
ThankYou! www.cermakaspol.com