1 / 29

R. Gatto, S. Loriga, A. Spizzichino Istat, Italian Statistical Institute Labour Force Survey unit

Producing monthly estimates of labour market indicators exploiting the longitudinal dimension of the LFS microdata. R. Gatto, S. Loriga, A. Spizzichino Istat, Italian Statistical Institute Labour Force Survey unit Silvia Loriga silvia.loriga@istat.it NTTS 2009 - Bruxelles 19-20 February 2009.

liseli
Download Presentation

R. Gatto, S. Loriga, A. Spizzichino Istat, Italian Statistical Institute Labour Force Survey unit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Producing monthly estimates of labour market indicators exploiting the longitudinal dimension of the LFS microdata R. Gatto, S. Loriga, A. Spizzichino Istat, Italian Statistical Institute Labour Force Survey unit Silvia Loriga silvia.loriga@istat.it NTTS 2009 - Bruxelles 19-20 February 2009

  2. LFS is a continuous survey; main results are produced on quarterly basis • Eurostat currently releases monthly unemployment estimates based on LFS data (national and EU level); methodologies are chosen by each NSI • Italy is still not producing monthly unemployment estimates (Italian figures are quarterly estimates) • From 2007 a study project is being conducted in Istat (supported by an Eurostat grant). The object is: • to study a proper methodology to produce robust monthly estimates based exclusively on LFS data (no administrative sources on unemployment are available in Italy) • to deal with the complexity of producing monthly estimates on regular basis, no later than 3 weeks after the end of each month (partial sample) NTTS 2009

  3. Methods used by Member States NTTS 2009

  4. Estimators comparison in the Italian study CONTEXT • External sources on monthly unemployment not available (use of registered unemployed or Chow Lin)… COMPARISON • The direct monthly estimator from LFS (the LFS sampling design has a monthly stratification) • The regression composite monthly estimator from LFS • The 3-months moving average estimator from LFS (only if 1 and 2 are not satisfactory) CRITERIA • Sampling error, robustness, time series decomposition, coherence with quarterly estimates NTTS 2009

  5. The Italian sample rotation scheme • 2-(2)-2 • households participate to the survey 4 times during a 15 months period • 50% overlap between following quarters • 50% overlap between a quarter and the same quarter of the previous year • The sample follows a monthly stratification: • 50% overlap between months t and t-3 • 50% overlap between months t and t-12 NTTS 2009

  6. The regression composite estimator (RCE) 1 • It is a kind of composite estimator • Direct estimators: design based, only observed sample information • Composite estimators: model based, observed sample + additional information • It may be applied to repeated surveys with partially overlapping samples • The idea: as the employment status observed in a previous point in time is correlated with the current employment status, using it as auxiliary variable will improve the estimation • It is based on the regression of the usual cross-sectional estimator on a set of predictors computed on the overlapping sub-sample from previous time points • Level and changes estimates are improved NTTS 2009

  7. The regression composite estimator (RCE) 2 • Singh et al. developed for the Canadian LFS a kind of RCE in which micro-level past information are used as predictors, through calibration • Calibration estimator: • weights wk are computed in two steps: • 1: initial weights dk are obtained as the inverse of the inclusion probabilities • 2: final weights wk are obtained solving the following minimization problem under constraints: solved through an iterative procedure NTTS 2009

  8. The regression composite estimator (RCE) 3 • The calibration estimator is the estimator currently used to produce quarterly LFS estimates in Italy • In the regression composite version of the calibration estimator developed to produce monthly estimates for the Italian LFS • additional auxiliary variables have been introduced: the employment status observed at the individual level 3 months ago and 12 months ago (only for individuals in the overlapping sub-sample) • constraints are derived from the previous estimates referred to 3 months ago and 12 months ago obtained using this same estimator (X overlapping %) • No longitudinal auxiliary variables (no constraints) for the non overlapping sub-sample (no imputation as Canadian LFS estimator) NTTS 2009

  9. The regression composite estimator (RCE) 4 • Monthly estimator similar methodology as the quarterly estimator; good for coherence • Based on weights computation; good to produce consistent estimates of different variables • Design based through the use of inclusion probabilities in weights computation • Micro-level model based through the use of individual auxiliary variables • It exploit the longitudinal dimension of the sample: • Considering 3 months ago and 12 months ago information we are adding information on both short and long term period • Estimation of changes at t-3 and t-12 improves • More robust estimation of both trend and seasonality NTTS 2009

  10. Dealing with partial sample 1 • According Reg. 577/98 interviews can be done until 5 weeks after each reference week • Quarterly data have to be transmitted to Eurostat within 12 weeks of the end of the quarter • Monthly estimates have to be produced and transmitted no later than 3 weeks after the end of each month • Monthly estimates have to be computed over a partial sample • Higher sampling errors • Not at random: mode (capi/cati), reference week within the month, household typologies, employment status • Bias • Variability over time • Higher distance with final monthly and quarterly estimates NTTS 2009

  11. Dealing with partial sample 2 1st quarter 2008 weekly data NTTS 2009

  12. Dealing with partial sample 3 2nd quarter 2008 weekly data NTTS 2009

  13. Dealing with partial sample 4 From 4th quarter 2007 to 3rd quarter 2008 monthly data NTTS 2009

  14. Dealing with partial sample 5 From 4th quarter 2007 to 3rd quarter 2008 monthly data NTTS 2009

  15. Dealing with partial sample 6 • To correct for bias due to the partial sample, additional constraints have been included in the calibration procedure: • Households by 4 rotation groups • Households by mode (capi-cati) • Households by reference week (4 or 5 in each month) • Constraints are derived from the theoretical sample • By this way bias due to the partial sample is partially corrected and estimates over partial samples are closer to final estimates over the whole sample NTTS 2009

  16. Legenda • QCE(Q): Quarterly calibration estimator - per quarter (the usual quarterly estimator) • QCE(M): Quarterly calibration estimator - per month (the usual quarterly estimator applied to single months) • MCE(M): Monthly calibration estimator (a calibration estimator similar to the usual one, computed for each month) • MRCE(M): Monthly regression composite estimator (a calibration estimator similar to the usual one + constraints on condition at t-3 and t-12, computed for each month) NTTS 2009

  17. Employment estimates NTTS 2009

  18. Unemployment estimates NTTS 2009

  19. Erratic componentEmployment estimates NTTS 2009

  20. Erratic componentUnemployment estimates NTTS 2009

  21. Main references As the regression composite estimator Survey Methodology – Volume 27, Number 1, June 2001 Special section on Composite Estimation • A.C. Singh, B. Kennedy and S. Wu “Regression Composite Estimation for the Canadian Labour Force Survey with a Rotating Panel Design” and following papers by • W.A. Fuller and J.N.K. Rao • P. Bell • J. Gambino, B. Kennedy and M.P. Singh As the calibration estimator • J.C. Deville and C.E. Särndal (1992) “Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling” JASA, vol. 87 NTTS 2009

  22. Annex 1Quarterly calibration constraints NTTS 2009

  23. Monthly calibration constraints NTTS 2009

  24. Annex 2QCE(M)_emp NTTS 2009

  25. MCE(M)_emp NTTS 2009

  26. MRCE(M)_emp NTTS 2009

  27. QCE(M)_une NTTS 2009

  28. MCE(M)_une NTTS 2009

  29. MRCE(M)_une NTTS 2009

More Related