In Pursuit of Happiness

1. In Pursuit of Happiness English 2P: Unit 3 ERWC Module

2. Unit Goal: • After reading and discussing articles, research results, and comic strips about “happiness” students will be able to write an essay which describes views of happiness and states a position on the importance of pursuing happiness. • Position will be supported through the use of ethos, pathos, and logos. • Counterarguments will be integrated and addressed. • Academic tone will be developed through the integration of readings and experiences in the writing.

3. Today’s Objective • By annotating the article “In the Pursuit of Happiness” students will be able to identify the author’s main ideas, purpose and evaluate supporting details and evidence.

4. AGENDA: • First, we will make predictions based on the article’s title and vocabulary. • Then, we will read the text using questions to GUIDE our annotations. • Finally, we will create MARGINALIA to deepen our understanding of the author’s purpose, main idea, and supporting evidence.

5. PREDICT • Before you read Darren M. McMahon’s text, “In Pursuit of Unhappiness,” just read the title, and jot down what you think the author means by the title. Predict what the article might be about based on your understanding of the title. Read the opening paragraphs after discussing the title, and add any new information to your predictions. • 1.What does the title “In Pursuit of Un happiness” tell you about McMahon’s position on what makes a person happy? • 2.What do you think is the article’s purpose?

6. PREDICT • The right laid out in our nation’s Declaration of Independence - to pursue happiness to our hearts’ content - is nowhere on better display than in the rites of the holiday season. • Like the cycle of the seasons, our emphasis on mirth may seem timeless, as though human beings have always made merry from beginning to end. • That shift was monumental, and its implications far reaching. Among other things, it was behind the transformation of the holiday season from a time of pious remembrance into one of unadulterated bliss.

7. PREDICT • For example, economists like Lord Richard Layard and Daniel Kahneman have argued that the apparent stagnancy of happiness in modern societies should prompt policymakers to shift their priorities from the creation of wealth to the creation of good feelings, from boosting gross national product to increasing gross national happiness. • “Ask yourself whether you are happy, and you cease to be so,” Mill concluded after recovering from a serious bout of depression. Rather than resign himself to gloom, however, Mill vowed instead to look for happiness in another way. • For our own culture, steeped as it is in the relentless pursuit of personal pleasure and endless cheer, that message is worth heeding.

8. PREDICT • Based on the vocabulary choices made by the author: What do you think McMahon will have to say about the American goal to be happy?

9. First read: ANNOTATE • Underline sentences that help you understand the author’s argument and purpose. Use the following questions to guide your annotations. • What is the author’s argument? Purpose? • What evidence does the author use to support his argument? Accomplish his purpose? • What is the author’s tone? What word choices does he make to communicate the appropriate tone? • Do you agree with him? Why or why not? • Circle KEY WORDS or WORDS you do not understand.

10. Second read: MARGINALIA SECOND READ: Explain your annotations: * Identify and Summarize Main Ideas: i.e. This explains that___. ✔ Evidence used to support argument: i.e. This demonstrates/ illustrates/conveys. ? Clarify questions and confusion: i.e. I don’t understand ____. What does ___ mean? I wonder why____.

11. DISCUSS ARTICLE After finishing the article, discuss the following questions with your classmates: • What is the author’s argument? Purpose? • How evidence does the author use to support his argument? Accomplish his purpose? • What is the author’s tone? What word choices does he make to communicate the appropriate tone? • Do you agree with him? Why or why not?