1 / 72

EMC Compatibility in Europe

EMC Compatibility in Europe . John Molyneux Senior Consultant. Overview. Give the results gained from the study. Main essentials of methodology, processes, participants and requirements. Large range and diverse involvement from many parties.

lita
Download Presentation

EMC Compatibility in Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EMC Compatibility in Europe John Molyneux Senior Consultant

  2. Overview Give the results gained from the study Main essentials of methodology, processes, participants and requirements Large range and diverse involvement from many parties. Range of standards from local to EN: often both

  3. Interactions

  4. Discover the Participants Discover the Methods Overview

  5. Results Respondents Information available from 26 of the 27 Countries Channel Tunnel declined to participate Information Quality Very variable most respondents concentrate on higher level aspects Alternative Sources from personal contact at Convocation , Internet and published standards Coverage Participants and methods well covered Little information on Costs and timescales

  6. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Austria Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie (Bmvit). Eisenbahngesetz 1957 and international requirements list Tri-partate interaction

  7. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Austria Evidence in the process is given from internal and third party testing, expert opinion, examination of design documentation for electrical electronic and software systems. timescale between 1 and 24 months: test campaign for a new vehicle €60,000 and two weeks.

  8. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Belgium DRSI (Department of Railway Safety and Interoperability) Department of Mobility and Transport Directorate-General for Land Transport (Mobilit) Definitions from NMBS an umbrella organisation consisting of Infrabel, SNCB, Fonds de l’Infrastructure Ferroviaire Four Stage Process

  9. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Belgium Evidence in the process is given from internal and third party testing and detailed in a series of technical reports. No Timescale or Costs

  10. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Bulgaria Изпълнителна Агенция "Железопътна Администрация Executive Agency :"Railway Administration" of the Ministry of Transport and Communication. Ordinance 41 of 27.06.2001, Ordinance 47 of 28.12.2001,Ordinance 57 of 09.06.2004 No detailed information available directly

  11. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in the Czech Republic Drážní úřad (DU ; National Railway Authority). Directive DU No: 1-890/06-DU Regulation 352/94: Regulation 266/94 , Regulation 173/95 Regulation100/95, Regulation177/95 Complex interactions

  12. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in the Czech Republic Evidence in the process is given from testing ,Expert opinion from approved third parties. technical reports. Costs for the whole procedure are 1.5M€ Timescales 2-2.5 years including 12 month test period followed by 12 month trial running period.

  13. Results The demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Denmark NRA (Trafikstyrelsen) Banedanmark performs compatibility. QN 903 Q no 0779: technical rules EMC BN2-74-1. Bi-partate interaction

  14. Results The demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Denmark Evidence in the process is given from internal and third party testing, expert opinion, examination of design documentation for electrical electronic and software systems. The process is stated to take from 2 to 3 months and the costs (excluding the manufacturers costs for testing) are approximately €15000..

  15. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Estonia Tehnilise Järelevalve Amet (TJA) Estonian technical surveillance authority Converting to EN and TSI Iterative interaction

  16. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Estonia Evidence in the process is given from manufacturer, third party testing, and expert opinion from approved bodies. No Details of Costs or Timescales

  17. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Finland NSA Rautatievirasto Järnvägsverket (The Finnish Rail Agency) No separate provision for EMC. Acceptance tests based on EC 61133/EN50215 And LISO 1.8 (being updated) Interaction NSA, RU, Manufacturer VR-Yhtymä Oy (IM)

  18. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Finland Evidence from test results, simulations and expert opinion with support from manufacturer presented in technical file. No Costs or Timescales given

  19. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in France NSA L’Établissement Public de Sécurité Ferroviaire (EPSF) SAMS 710 in 2X63 testing to SAMS documentation Interaction Réseau Ferré de France SCNF as IM SNCF-CIM OQA(DeBo).

  20. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in France Evidence from test results from Eurailtest under manufacturer supervision. Other evidence from information from subsystem tests, suppliers and consultants. No Costs or Timescales given

  21. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Germany NSA Eisenbahn-Bundesamt (EBA) 31_Regelung_EMV_01,02,03 and 04 Interaction EBA DB NOBO In form of flowchart detailing stages

  22. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Germany Evidence from test results from the RU devolved to manufacturer and Notified Bodies No Costs or Timescales given

  23. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Greece Υπουργού Υποδομών Μεταφορών και Δικτύων (YME) Ministry of Transportation and Communication. Decision ΑΣ.4.2/οικ.26697/2422 (Official Gazette of the Hellenic Republic B’ 986/22.05.2009 Interaction All parties with YME Certification from Ministry

  24. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Greece Evidence from test results, simulations, expert opinion and third party certification from manufacturer or RU. process (excluding tests) 2 weeks no costs are given

  25. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Hungary National Traffic Authority of Hungary (Nemzeti Közlekedési Hatóság : NKH) Implementation Procedure 28/2003 (V.8) GKM Interaction NKH with technical input from MAV/TEB

  26. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Hungary Evidence from test train trial running. evaluation by expert opinion Overall process takes from between 3 to 6 months No estimates of the costs available.

  27. The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Ireland Results NSA: Railway Safety Commission (RSC) Railway safety standard 56 Technical RSC-G-009, RSC-G-015, RSC-G-020 Interaction RSC ,RST and CCS experts

  28. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Ireland Evidence from test results, expert opinion, certification, simulations third party measurements. The overall timescale 2.5 years No estimates were made of the cost of the process.

  29. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Italy NSA: Agenzia Nazionale per la Sicurezza delle Ferrovie – (ANSF) Railway safety standard 56 Technical RSC-G-009, RSC-G-015, RSC-G-020 Tri-Partate Interaction Suppliers, NSA ISA/NOBO Rete Ferroviaria Italiana has technical role

  30. Probabilistic Method

  31. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Italy Evidence from testing and technical analysis , Probabilistic process applied to analysis. No estimates were made of the cost or timescale of the process.

  32. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Latvia Valsts dzelzceja tehniskā inspekcija. State Railway Technical Inspectorate Cabinet rules Nr.148, Nr.713, Nr. 483 Interaction Manufacturer, Railway Inspectorate Third Parties Infrastructure Controller

  33. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Latvia Evidence from test results, calculations and simulations, expert opinion, comparison with existing trains and third party certification. No estimates of the timescales or costs available.

  34. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Lithuania Valstybinės Geležinkelio Inspekcija (VGI) Railway Directive Interaction Railway Inspectorate RU Laboratory Testing

  35. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Lithuania Evidence from test results, examined by panel of experts within the Inspectorate Process timescales 60-90 days No estimates of the costs available.

  36. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Luxembourg NSA: Administration des Chemins de Fer – (ANS) IF-PE.STC-VF.01, VF.01 and VF.03 Interaction RU collates and presents to Administration

  37. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Luxembourg Evidence from test results, calculations and simulations presented in a technical file plus third party certification to EN standards. Costs and timescales variable dependent on complexity.

  38. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in the Netherlands NSA: Inspectie Verkeer en Waterstaat Toezichteenheid Rail (IVW-TER ), TSI or Dutch law for railways (RKS) (ATIV) Interaction RU Ministry of Transport , IVW ProRail NOBO VAB

  39. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in the Netherlands Evidence from testing and technical analysis supported by simulation and third party testing analysis and certification (EN) Timescale is approximately 1 year No estimate of cost could be made.

  40. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Norway NSA: Norwegian Railway Inspectorate (Statens jernbanetilsyn). NES TS02 ”Requirements on rolling stock in Norway (JD590) and Sweden (BVS 543.19300) Interaction RU and Inspectorate Supported by Manufacturer, Infrastructure manager authorised third parties

  41. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Norway Evidence from testing and compatibility statements from IM and third parties No estimates were made of the cost or timescale of the process.

  42. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Poland NSA: Office for Railway Transport (UTK). The Ministry of Infrastructure’s Regulations. Interaction Notified Body Office of Railway Transport

  43. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Poland Evidence from testing and compatibility statements from IM and third parties No estimates were made of the cost or timescale of the process.

  44. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Portugal NSA: Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes Terrestres, I.P (IMTT) The Ministry of Infrastructure’s Regulations. Interaction REFER – I M RU Manufacturer Consulatancies to support REFER IMTT – NSA APNCF – Notified Body.

  45. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Portugal Evidence from testing and compatibility statements from IM and third parties No estimates were made of the cost or timescale of the process.

  46. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Romania NSA: Autoritatea Feroviara Romana (AFER). Procedural OMT 535/2008 Technical OMTCT1193/2004 Interaction AFER OFER-NoBo ANCOM SC Electrificare –IM National Institute

  47. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Romania Evidence is assessed by conformance to a technical check list, third party tests and expert opinion. Timescale documentation process: 30 days No estimates of costs

  48. The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in the Slovak Republic Results The Railway Regulatory Authority - Úrad pre reguláciu železničnej dopravy (URZD) Especificaciones Técnicas de Homologación.(ETH) and PD CLC/TR50507:2007 Interaction URZD Technical Institutes WUZ,VUD,VUKV, VUZ ZSR - IM NoBo

  49. The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in the Slovak Republic Results Evidence from vehicle type tests by IM is assessed by panel of Technical Experts from Railway institutes Timescale documentation process: 5 days Documentation cost €9500 Other costs borne by RU/ manufacturer

  50. Results The Demonstration of Electromagnetic Compatibility in Slovenia NSA: AŽP Javna agencija za železniški promet RS – (Public Agency for Rail Transport of RS) No Information Received and No information available from other research sources

More Related