490 likes | 849 Views
Strategies for Breast Cancer Prevention. John Park Hannah Connolly Jeff Tice Mary S. Beattie. Breast Cancer Prevention!. Is breast cancer preventable?. 5-fold variation in rates around the world (West >> Asia) Migrants assume rate of new country in 1 or 2 generations
E N D
Strategies for Breast Cancer Prevention John Park Hannah Connolly Jeff Tice Mary S. Beattie
Is breast cancer preventable? • 5-fold variation in rates around the world (West >> Asia) • Migrants assume rate of new country in 1 or 2 generations • 4-fold increase in incidence in Iceland over 80 years* *Tryggvadottir JNCI 2006
Change in the US Death Rates* by Cause, 1950 & 2005 Rate Per 100,000 1950 2005 HeartDiseases CerebrovascularDiseases Influenza &Pneumonia Cancer * Age-adjusted to 2000 US standard population
Why risk assessment? • Tamoxifen and raloxifene FDA approved for prevention in high risk women: a 5-year risk >1.66% • “American Cancer Society advises MRI for high risk women.” - March 28, 2007 Defined as 20-25% lifetime risk.
Factors Considered in The Gail Risk Model • Current age • Race / Ethnicity • Age at menarche • Age at first live birth • Number of 1° relatives with BC • Number of breast biopsies • Presence of ADH Based on Caucasian women undergoing regular screening (BCDDP) Gail et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879; 1989.
Validated for populations; but modest discriminatory value for the individual. Gail Model on NCI website • 5 year and lifetime estimates by race http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/ Rockhill et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:358, 2001.
Age of diagnosis for family members 2nd degree relatives Alcohol intake Diabetes Physical activity Use of HRT Lactation history Height Weight IGF-1, IGF-BP3 Hormone level (E2, T, SHBG) Bone mineral density Mammographic density NAF/Lavage SNPs Risk factors not included in Gail model
No association with breast cancer • Dietary fat intake • Hunter 1996 • Pooled prospective studies • 4980 cases in 337,819 women • Fruits & vegetables • Smith-Warner, JAMA, 2001 • Pooled prospective studies • 7377 cases in 351,825 women • Carotenoids; Vitamins A, C, E • Selenium
Alcohol and breast cancer risk:Meta-analysis 2.5 2.0 1.5 Multivariate Relative Risk 1.0 Smith-Warner, 1998 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total Alcohol Intake g/d
Exercise and risk of breast cancer WHI Observational Cohort (n=74,171; 1780 cancers) • Overall 25-30% decreased risk • Greatest in thinner women • Lifetime exercise matters • Modest amounts: 1-3 hours brisk walking/week McTiernan, JAMA, 2003.
Effect modification by HT use WHI Observational Cohort, n=85 917; 1030 cancers. P interaction < 0.001 Libby, CCC, 2002
2nd Look: Low fat diet RCTs for BC RR (95% CI) • WHI: 0.91 (0.86-1.01) • Primary prevention • 25% of total calories • WINS: 0.76 (0.60-0.98) • Secondary prevention • 20% of total calories • WHEL: 0.96 (0.80-1.14) Prentice JAMA 2006; Chlebowski JNCI 2006; Pierce JAMA 2007.
Reducing the risk of breast cancer • Early childbirth, breast feed • Exercise 3-7 hours / week • Maintain normal body weight • Minimize alcohol • Avoid long term HT, especially progestins • Low fat diet? Estimated 30-80% reduction in risk
Continuum of Risk 0% 100% Lifestyle Increased Surveillance Surgical prevention Chemoprevention Risk-reducing Surgeries
Women’s Health Initiative: Breast Cancer with HRT and ERT HRT Placebo Placebo ERT JAMA 2002 JAMA 2004
Ravden NEJM 07 Ravdin P et al. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1670-1674
Breast Cancer Prevention Trial(BCPT) • 13,388 women age > 35 • Estimated 5 year risk ≥ 1.66% • 20 mg tamoxifen vs. placebo • Stopped after average of 4 yrs; median follow-up: 55 months Fisher, JNCI, 1998
Tamoxifen reduced risk at all ages Placebo 8 Tamoxifen 6 Rate per 1,000 4 2 0 ≤49 50 - 59 ≥ 60 Age (years) Fisher, et al. JNCI 1998;90:1371
Tamoxifen in very high risk women Placebo 6.8 Tamoxifen All women 3.4 9.9 ≥2 relatives 5.1 Atypical 10.1 hyperplasia 1.4 13 LCIS 5.7 0 5 10 15 Rate per 1,000 Fisher JNCI 1998; 90:1371
Adverse Events From Prevention Trials of Tamoxifen & Raloxifene DVT/PE: 1.9 (1.4-2.6) Endometrial cancer 2.4 (1.5-4.0) risk fatal stroke risk cataracts risk hot flashes ** Majority of adverse events in women ≥ 50 years Fisher JNCI,1998; Cuzick Lancet, 2003; Barrett-Conner, NEJM, 2006.
STAR Trial: Key outcomesper 1000 woman-years 19,747 women randomized, 5 year f/u Postmenopausal, average risk 4.0% Outcome Tam 20 mg Ralox 60 mg Invasive BC 4.3 4.4 Uterine Ca 2.0 1.2 *DVT/PE 3.7 2.6 Osteop. Fx 2.7 2.5 CVD event 4.4 4.6 *Cataracts 12.3 9.7 * P < 0.05 Vogel, JAMA, 2006
Raloxifene vs. Tamoxifen Pro raloxifene Equivalent reduction in IBC Less thromboembolism, uterine cancer, and cataracts Primary care comfort with therapy Con raloxifene Post-menopausal women only Generic tamoxifen less $$$
Aromatase inhibitors: the future? Block conversion of T to E ATAC: Treatment trial n=9366, 8 years Anastrazole vs. Tamoxifen 40% reduction in contralateral cancer Less endometrial cancer, VTE, stroke More fractures and musculoskeletal pain Letrozole after tamoxifen 37% reduction in contralateral cancer ATAC, Lancet Onc, 2008; Goss, JNCI, 2005. Ingle Annal Onc 2008.
Case : Jennifer 34 year old woman My mother’s fine and I don’t have a sister. But my dad had 4 sisters, 2 of whom developed breast cancer and my paternal grandmother also had breast cancer 5-year Gail risk = .31%
The Gail Model Can Underestimate Hereditary Risk of Breast Cancer Breast, 44 Breast, 38 Breast, 29 Ovary, 42 Jennifer, 37 This woman’s breast cancer risk greatly underestimated by Gail model
How Much Breast Cancer Is Hereditary? 15%20% 5%–10% Breast Cancer Sporadic Family clusters Hereditary ASCO
Features that indicate increased likelihood of BRCA mutations Multiple cases of early onset breast cancer Ovarian cancer Breast and ovarian cancer in the same woman Bilateral breast cancer Ashkenazi Jewish heritage Male breast cancer
BRCA1/2 Mutations Increase the Risk of Early-Onset Breast Cancer By age 40 By age 50 By age 70 Population Risk 0.5% 2% 7% Hereditary Risk 10%-20% 33%-50% 56%-87%
Penetrance = Degree to which individuals possessing a genetic trait express that trait Prevalence = Number of carriers in a population at a specific time Research ongoing Moving Targets: Penetrance, Prevalence Breast Cancer Penetrance by BRCA1 or BRCA2 and Age Prevalence depends on population 98-99.8% of US population is -
Screening and Chemoprevention in BRCA Carriers Breast cancer CBE q 6 months, MRI/mammo at 25 y/o Tamoxifen may be more effective for BRCA2 than BRCA1 (80% of BRCA2 is ER+ and 80% of BRCA1 is ER-) Ovarian cancer Efficacy of CA125 and U/S unclear-- When to start? How frequently? Whether to? OCP’s for 3-5 years: 50% ↓ ovarian cancer
Surgical options for BRCA carriers Risk-reducing salpingo-oophrectomy (RRSO) ↓ ovarian and tubal cancers by 95% Fine sectioning detects “occult tumors” in about 10% of tubes/ovaries If pre-menopausal, 50% ↓ in breast cancer Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) ↓ breast cancer by 95% Many reconstruction options
Summary points Lifestyle Exercise, weight loss or maintenance Minimize alcohol Avoid/stop HT Low fat diet? Consider tamoxifen or raloxifene for high risk women Assess familial risk Consider prophylactic surgery for BRCA carriers
“Grateful patients are few in preventive medicine … where success is marked by a non-event” Geoffrey Rose UK epidemiologist
Programs at UCSF Cancer Risk Program Genetic counseling and testing 415-885-7779 877-RISK4CA (toll-free) Breast Care Center: High Risk Program 415-353-7070
BRCA testing can modify 5-year risk beyond family history *FH = mother, sister, or daughter with breast cancer any age