1 / 15

Presentation of Example 3A: MC for verifying the performance of a HACCP system by the FBO

Presentation of Example 3A: MC for verifying the performance of a HACCP system by the FBO. Drafting team: Claus Heggum (IDF) Jorge J. Guerrero Vallejos (BO) Omar Bun Njie (GM) Abimbola Adegboye (NG). General approach. Purpose:

liz
Download Presentation

Presentation of Example 3A: MC for verifying the performance of a HACCP system by the FBO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presentation ofExample 3A:MC for verifying the performance of a HACCP system by the FBO Drafting team: Claus Heggum (IDF) Jorge J. Guerrero Vallejos (BO) Omar Bun Njie (GM) AbimbolaAdegboye (NG)

  2. General approach Purpose: To verify the intended performance over time of a food safety control system managed by a HACCP system, through use of the moving window approach Prerequisite: The usefulness of end products testing as a means of verification has been established by the hazard analysis. Responsibility for design & application: The HACCP team of an FBO

  3. GENERAL approach Sampling material: Food Point of application: End of manufacture Target organisms: As determined by hazard analysis: • Pathogens that the HACCP system has been designed to control (e.g. Listeria monocytogenes) • Indicators for these hazards (e.g. Listeria spp., S. aureus) • Hygiene indicators (e.g. Enterobacteriacea, TPC, etc) Official MC may determine the choice

  4. General approach: Sampling plan Moving window: A series of sampling occasions with a specified sampling frequency within a defined time frame • = n  = e.g. one/week  = n * frequency

  5. A MOVING WINDOW n=5; c=2; m=10,000; M=100,000

  6. A MOVING WINDOW WINDOW n=5; c=2; m=10,000; M=100,000

  7. A MOVING WINDOW WINDOW n=5; c=2; m=10,000; M=100,000

  8. A MOVING WINDOW WINDOW n=5; c=2; m=10,000; M=100,000

  9. A MOVING WINDOW WINDOW n=5; c=2; m=10,000; M=100,000

  10. A MOVING WINDOW WINDOW n=5; c=2; m=10,000; M=100,000

  11. A MOVING WINDOW WINDOW n=5; c=2; m=10,000; M=100,000

  12. Actions in case of non-comformity When? • When ”M” is exceeded (individual results) • When ”c” is exceeded (within the sampling period) What? (based on review of data, source tracking & cause analysis)

  13. HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE MC for S. aureus: n=10; c=3; m=0; M=100 Dailytesting Line #1 - Cheesemanufacturing Freshcheese Line #2 - Cheesemanufacturing Milk reception Milk processing Freshcheese Line #1 - Cheesemanufacturing Freshcheese

  14. Hypotheticalexample

  15. Thankyou!

More Related