250 likes | 520 Views
Operant or Instrumental Conditioning. Psychology 3306. Introduction. Thorndike and his puzzle boxes Guthrie and Horton Superstitious Behaviour Interim Terminal Adjunctive Not exactly superstitious or random. Shaping. Successive approximations Get closer and closer to behaviour
E N D
Operant or Instrumental Conditioning Psychology 3306
Introduction • Thorndike and his puzzle boxes • Guthrie and Horton • Superstitious Behaviour • Interim • Terminal • Adjunctive • Not exactly superstitious or random
Shaping • Successive approximations • Get closer and closer to behaviour • Secondary reinforcers • Feeder click for example • Behaviour modification
Freddie! • Coined the phrase ‘Operant conditioning’ • The animal operates on the environment • Unlike ‘respondent conditioning’ (Pavlovian) • Pioneered the use of free operants • Pioneered the use of respone rate
The Skinner Box • Basically this allowed the researcher to walk away • Allowed for a dependent variable that could be easily measured and compared across species too
Criticisms of the Skinner box • Is it artificial? • Well duh… • But • Many species can be tested • Real world applications • Therapy • Who cares?
Key concepts and terms • Discriminative stimulus • Three term contingency • Acquisition • Extinction • Spontaneous recovery • Generalization • Conditioned reinforcement • Response chains
Constraints • Instinctive drift and the Brelands • Autoshaping (Brown and Jenkins, 1968) • Superstitious behaviour? • Form of response depends on reinforcer (Jenkins and Moore, 1973) • Wasserman’s chicks (1973) • Timberlake’s behaviour systems approach
Schedules of Reinforcement • You could give a reinforcement after each behaviour you are interested in • This is called CRF or Continuous reinforcement • However this is rarely used • Does not maintain behaviour very well
Schedules of Reinforcement • Fixed Interval • First response after a given interval is rewarded • FI Scallop • Variable Interval • Like FI but varies with a given average • Scallop disappears
Schedules of Reinforcement • Fixed Ratio • Reinforcement is given after a given number of responses • A little less smooth • Variable Ratio • After a varying number of responses
Schedules and their properties • Variable schedules are more robust • PREE, Partial reinforcement extinction effect • Harder to extinguish responding on VI, FI, VR and FR than on CRF • DRL, Differential reinforcement for low rates of responding • DRH, High rates
Schedule this…. • Concurrent and chained schedules • Behaviour follows the schedule in effect at the time • Allowed people to determine that the post reinforcement pause in FR schedules is due to the present schedule and not the previous one
Applications • Work with autistic kids • Prompts • Fading • Secondary reinforcers • Token economies • I/O applications • Behaviour therapy
These ideas are nothing new… • Most folks are unaware of schedules and contingencies • Systematic application thereof • Who cares?
Punishment and avoidance Behavior increases decreases Stimulus Presented Stimulus Removed or omitted
Avoidance • Shuttle box • Go from escape to avoidance • Avoidance paradox • Two factor theory • Avoid by escaping CS • Animals will avoid a CS that predicts shock in another context
But…. • Does the CS induce fear? • Equivocal at best • Maybe avoidance itself is reinforcing • This is the one factor theory • The Sidman test shows that this is true, avoidance itself is reinforcing • But, temporal conditioning
Cognitive theories • Selligman and Johnston • Expectations • Animal expects: • No shock if it responds • Shock if it does not respond • This explains the slow extinction • Shock avoidance response blocking, remove the ability to escape, you get extinction
More on avoidance • Bob Bolle’s idea about SSDRs • Learned helplessness • Is it depression? • Suggestive, but not quite I don’t think
Punishment • Opposite of reinforcement? • Sorta • But, to be effective it must be: • Introduced at full intensity • Given immediately • After every behaviour • Motivational effects • Other contingencies and behaviours
Bad boys bad boys, watcha gonna do? • Maybe a punisher is an SD? • All that said punishment CAN control behaviour • So, what’s the down side?
punishment • Fear and anger are bad for learning • General suppression • Constant monitoring needed • Avoidance • Reluctance to use it • Bad consequences • It is just plain mean
Omission • The avoidance of punishment • Easily learned • With all this stuff on punishment, remember morality and data are two different things