90 likes | 266 Views
Low quality education as a poverty trap – Introduction and welcoming . Servaas van der Berg Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University PSPPD Project – 28 March 2011. Welcome and word of thanks to PSPPD.
E N D
Low quality education as a poverty trap – Introduction and welcoming Servaas van der Berg Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University PSPPD Project – 28 March 2011
Welcome and word of thanks to PSPPD This research project was undertaken with financial assistance of the Programme to Support Pro-Poor Policy Development (PSPPD), a partnership programme between the European Union and The Presidency, South Africa. The findings do not reflect the position of The Presidency or the EU. This funding has made possible research that otherwise could not have been done on this scale or in this timeframe Almost 20 people were involved in one way or another. The project analysed about 20 major datasets and produced the following outputs: • Ten Working Papers, quite a few of which will become journal articles • Five Policy Briefs, which are distributed to hundreds of policy makers • A summary report that is also widely distributed • A series of policy recommendations, flowing from individual papers, that will in time be digested and carried further in our ongoing discussions with policy makers All of this would have been impossible without the financial support of EU and Presidency through the PSPPD. It would also have been much more difficult without the enthusiastic assistance of MastoeraSadan, Nathalie Vereen and ZsaZsaMilongo. I wish to thank them all on behalf of the whole Stellenbosch team.
SA’s dualistic school system and labour market Highquality schools • ±10% of schools, mainly ex-white, but racial composition changed • Produce strong cognitive skills • Teachers well qualified, schools function well, good assessment, parents involved • Some talented, motivated or lucky students manage the transition • Big demand for good schools, despite fees • A few schools cross the divide • Vocational training • Affirmative action Low productivity jobs & incomes • Often manual or low skill jobs • Limited or low quality education • Minimum wage can exceed their productivity Low quality schools • Produce very weak cognitive skills • Teachers less qualified, de-motiva-ted, many schools dysfunctional, weak assessment, little parental involvement, strong union presence • Mainly former black (DET) schools High productivity jobs & incomes ±10% of labour force – mainly professional, managerial & skilled jobs Requires graduates, good quality matric, or good vocationalskills Historically mainly whites
Education affects labour market outcomes • Good education provides access to top end of labour market – (better) jobs, higher wages • Skills shortage at top end causes a wage premium • Oversupply of unskilled workers depresses wages at bottom end • Race between demand and supply of skills will determine skills premium • This premium and the distribution of educational attainment are currently central to SA income inequality Employment probability, 2005 (conditional)
Education also determines individual prospects – with a potential vicious circle of weak education and poverty
Issues SA school performance in perspective: Schools and the labour market Weak performance, even in African context Poverty cannot explain this – SA’s poor fare worse than Africa’s poor The school system has two parts, one functioning fairly well, the other extremely weakly Resources bring little improvement in weak schools, due to functionality issues Features of poorly functioning schools: Slow macro pacing, poor use of instructional time, low curriculum coverage Low cognitive demand, weak assessment, little feedback Lack of textbooks/workbooks/reading material (some teachers think textbooks and workbooks are ‘not applicable’ in FP; libraries seldom function) Problems with second language teaching and learning Policy directions
Working Papers Gustafsson, M. 2010. “Policy note on pre-primary schooling: An empirical contribution to the 2009 Medium Term Strategic Framework”. WP05/2010 Du Rand, G., van Broekhuizen, H., & von Fintel, D. 2010. “Who Responds to Voluntary Cognitive Tests in Household Surveys? The role of labour market status, respondent confidence, motivation and a culture of learning in South Africa”. WP27/2010 Shepherd, D. 2011. “Constraints to school effectiveness: What prevents poor schools from delivering results?” WP05/2011 De Vos, M. 2011. “Quantitative and qualitative aspects of education in South Africa: An analysis using the National Income Dynamic Study”. WP06/2011 Moses, E. 2011. “Quality of education and the labour market: A conceptual and literature overview.” WP07/2011 Burger, C., & Van der Berg, S. 2011. “Modelling cognitive skills, ability and school quality to explain labour market earnings differentials". WP08/2011 Gustafsson, M. 2011. “The when and how of leaving school: The policy implications of new evidence on secondary schooling in South Africa”. WP09/2011 Taylor, S. 2011. “Uncovering indicators of effective school management in South Africa using the National School Effectiveness Study”. WP 10/2011 Spaull, N. 2011. “A preliminary analysis of SACMEQ III”. WP11/2011 Du Rand, G., van Broekhuizen, H., & von Fintel, D. 2011. “Numeric competence, confidence and school quality in the South African wage function”. WP12/2011
Policy briefs - 2011 Martin Gustafsson, New evidence in the case for improving the quality of secondary school learning outcomesStellenbosch Policy Brief No. 01/2011 Stephen Taylor, The vital role of good school management in improving primary school outcomesStellenbosch Policy Brief No. 02/2011 Nic Spaull, Identifying policy priorities to improve outcomes for poor primary school learnersStellenbosch Policy Brief No. 03/2011 Gideon du Rand, Hendrik van Broekhuizen & Dieter von Fintel, The role of educational attainment and quality schooling in reducing racial earnings inequalityStellenbosch Policy Brief No. 04/2011 Debra Shepherd, For richer, for poorer? Can lessons learnt from wealthy schools be applied to help poor schools deliver better results?Stellenbosch Policy Brief No. 05/2011
Data sets used All General Household Surveys (GHS) from 2002 to 2009 A number of Labour Force Surveys (LFS), in particular the last two containing wage data, 2007a and 2007b Income and Expenditure Survey (IES) of 2005/6 National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) of 2008 The South African data for SACMEQ III for 1997 PIRLS 2006 All three waves of the National School Effectiveness Study (NSES), entailing Grade 3 for 2008, Grade 4 for 2009 and Grade 5 for 2010 Matriculation (National Senior Certificate) data for 2009