150 likes | 252 Views
NTP metabolism and transduction. Cs34: Specificity II - Specific aminoacylation of tRNA. Biochemistry 655 4 April 2011. Goals. Introduce the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase class division Polarity of substrate amino acids
E N D
NTP metabolism and transduction Cs34: Specificity II - Specific aminoacylation of tRNA Biochemistry 655 4 April 2011
Goals • Introduce the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase class division • Polarity of substrate amino acids • Acceptor stem interactions - major/minor grooves and the Class I CCA3’ “hairpin”. • Dissect the anticodon binding site of GlnRS • Polar interactions • Nonpolar interactions • Specific base-pair recognition • Discuss what it means when the primary effects of anticodon mutations are to reduce kcat. • Relate the phenomenon of induced-fit to tRNA selection • Discuss the phenomenon of Kinetic proofreading of tRNA selection
Major Groove Minor Groove ~45 Å tRNA has approximate 2 symmetry
II Alanine Glycine Proline Serine Threonine Histidine Aspartic Acid Asparagine Lysine Phenylalanine I Leucine Valine Isoleucine Methionine Cysteine Arginine Glutamic Acid Glutamine Tyrosine Tryptophan Median DGxfr (H2O=>CHX) + 1.59 Kcal/mol - 2.97 { A } HIGH, KMSKS Motif 1, Motif 2 B C The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase class distinction <D(DG)> ~3.6 kcal/mol => 400X • Eriani, et al., (1990) Nature, 347:203-206 • Cusack, et al., (1990) Nature, 347:249-255
Arg Glu Glu ATP aa aa Arg Gly Asp His ATP Gly Need Class I amino acids Lys Ser His Lys Ser Need Class II amino acids Class I and II active sites are unrelated… Class I active sites Class II active sites … but deeply interdependent
Class I and II bind tRNAs from opposite sides, and to opposite grooves GlnRS AspRS AspRS
Superposition of Gln, Asp complexes via the acceptor stem reveals extensive territorial respect!
Generalization by Ribas & Schimmel Ribas & Schimmel (2001) Cell, 104:191-193
Acceptor stem Anticodon KM has practically no role in specificity!