1 / 35

Figure- 1

Piraye Yaras PhD Thesis, 1996. Figure- 1. h * =26 Pa.s. Binder Phase is a Newtonian Silicone Fluid Constant Magnitude of Complex Viscosity. Figure- 2. h =26.2 Pa.s. The shear viscosity and magnitude of complex viscosity are the same. Figure- 3.

lorna
Download Presentation

Figure- 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Piraye Yaras PhD Thesis, 1996 Figure-1

  2. h*=26 Pa.s Binder Phase is a Newtonian Silicone Fluid Constant Magnitude of Complex Viscosity Figure-2

  3. h=26.2 Pa.s The shear viscosity and magnitude of complex viscosity are the same Figure-3

  4. Data collected using two different capillary die diameters (D=0.0985 and 0.0675 in”) with two different L/Ds Figure-4

  5. Surface Quality of Extruded Samples (D=0.0985, L/D=45) This sample is extruded at 0.05 in/min and has a rough surface This sample is extruded at 0.5 in/min This sample is extruded at high crosshead speed (1 in/min) and it has smooth surface Figure-5

  6. Extruded at 0.05 in/min and has a rough surface Extruded at high crosshead speed (1 in/min) and it has smooth surface Figure-6

  7. Entrance Bagley Correction Figure-7

  8. Figure-8

  9. Figure-9

  10. Figure-10

  11. ( ) ¶ g τ = & 8 U s ¶ ( 1 / D ) t w w Figure-11

  12. Power low exponent of Us versus tw curve is close to 1 which is the case for a Newtonian binder Figure-12

  13. Qs/Q values are close to 1 at low shear stresses and decrease with increasing shear stress Figure-13

  14. Hershel Bulkley Fit- A t=4300+22144g0.616 Hershel Bulkley Fit- B t=1400+25979g0.546 Figure-14

  15. Corrected shear rate vs. shear viscosity @ wall

  16. Calculated apparent slip layer thickness,d, from experimental data and compared with theoretical equation given below [Kalyon, J. Rheol., 49(3),621-640 (2005)] Figure-17

  17. Comparison of materials of construction – Al vs. Stainless steal capillary dies Figure-18

  18. Squeeze Flow, D=2.25 in Figure-19

  19. Figure-20

  20. 30000 cst Binder Thermal Paste Frequency sweep @ 0.01% strain Figure-22

  21. Comparison of storage modulus of thermal pastes with two different binder – 30 000cst and 1000 cst

  22. Comparison of time sweep data @ 0.01% strain with different frequency values

  23. Time it takes for G’ to reach 90% of its steady state value

  24. Strain sweep @ 5 rps Figure-26

  25. Strain sweep @ 10 rps Figure-27

  26. Bergquist 1K cst, temperature dependence of the magnitude of complex viscosity

  27. Bergquist 1K cst, activation energy calculation

  28. Bergquist 30K cst, temperature dependence of the magnitude of complex viscosity

  29. Bergquist 30K cst, activation energy calculation

  30. Steady torsional flow torque calculations

  31. Apparent slip layer thickness vs. shear stress

  32. Wall slip velocity vs. shear stress

  33. Sinusoidal torque response during frequency sweep @ 0.01% Figure-35

More Related