270 likes | 625 Views
Radiation Effect Study on Tokai Carbon Nuclear Grade Graphite. M. Fechter and Y. Katoh Oak Ridge National Laboratory K. Takizawa and A. Kondo Tokai Carbon Presented at the 14 th International Nuclear Graphite Specialists Meeting (INGSM-14) September 16-18, 2013, Seattle, Washington.
E N D
Radiation Effect Study on Tokai Carbon Nuclear Grade Graphite M. Fechter and Y. KatohOak Ridge National Laboratory K. Takizawa and A. KondoTokai Carbon Presented at the 14th International Nuclear Graphite Specialists Meeting(INGSM-14) September 16-18, 2013, Seattle, Washington Disclaimer All data included in this presentation are preliminary and are subject to revision after further analysis and certification processes are complete.
Takizawa et al., ICACC-2012 Materials for evaluation • Nuclear grade graphite G347A and G458A manufactured by Tokai Carbon are used for microstructural analysis G347A and G458A are both fine-grained isotropic graphite which have the advantage of being highly strength G458A G347A 100μm 100μm Reference value * RT~100℃ ** RT~1000℃
Irradiation Matrix and Progress • Up to 4 x 1026 n/m2 at 300 – 900°C • Evaluation items • Dimensional evolution • Thermal conductivity • Thermal expansivity • Elastic constants • Electrical resistivity • Flexural strength • Microstructures
Multi-Purpose Rabbit Approach • One rabbit for one irradiation condition. • Custom-designed “mixed residence” capsule accommodates specimens of various types in a small rabbit vehicle. • Irradiation temperatures are estimated for individual specimens based on thermal analysis (shown) and measurement of SiC temperature calibration specimens.
Dimensional Evolutions: Volume Changes • Volume changes are plotted against fluence for nominal irradiation temperatures. • Actual irradiation temperatures may be significantly off from the nominal irradiation temperatures.
Dimensional Evolutions: G347A Replotted for Estimated Irradiation Temperatures • Volume changes are plotted for all specimen types. • Plotted against estimated actual irradiation temperature. • Note that irradiation temperature analysis is still in progress. • Key trends are clearly shown. At the highest fluences here, • T < ~450°C: near the bottom of submergence • T = ~600°C: irradiation strain regressing to zero • T > ~750°C: already in swelling regime
Dimensional Evolutions: G347A Replotted for Estimated Irradiation Temperatures • Volume changes are plotted for all specimen types. • Key trends are clearly shown. At the highest fluences here, • T < ~450°C: near the bottom of submergence • T = ~600°C: irradiation strain regressing to zero • T > ~750°C: already in swelling regime
Dimensional Evolutions: G347A vs. G458A • Data from side-by-side irradiation showing clear trends at 750°C. • Initial contraction rate about the same for two graphite grades. • Maximum contraction, fluence at contraction maximum, and fluence at zero volume change regressionG458A > G347A.
Dimensional Evolutions: G347A (An)Isotropy • Length changes for beam specimens (considered most accurate and reliable) are plotted. • Orientations • AG = against gravity = ~ with grain • WG = with gravity = ~ against grain • Anisotropy in irradiation strain is not negligible. • Likely common for “isotropic” graphite.
Dimensional Evolutions: Differential Irradiation Strains • WG dimensions are nearly always greater than AG dimensions. • Magnitude of differential strain increases with fluence approaching a few percent.
Dynamic Young’s Modulus • Pristine Young’s modulus ~11 GPa. • Up to ~3.7 times increase by irradiation. • Consistent with dimensional evolutions.
Dynamic Young’s Modulus • Pristine Young’s modulus ~11 GPa. • Up to ~3.7 times increase by irradiation. • Consistent with dimensional evolutions. Elastic modulus peaks after maximum contraction occurs
Dynamic Young’s Modulus (2) • Pristine Young’s modulus • G347A • ~10.7 GPa (AG) • ~10.8 GPa (WG) • G458A • ~12 GPa (WG) • Young’s modulus appears isotropic after irradiation. • Similar increase for two materials.
Equibiaxial Flexural Strength • Trends consistent with evolutions of dimensions and Young’s modulus. • Up to ~1.8 times increase in flexural strength may be explained by ~3.7 times increase in Young’s modulus.
Equibiaxial Flexural Strength • Trends consistent with evolutions of dimensions and Young’s modulus. • Up to ~1.8 times increase in flexural strength may be explained by ~3.7 times increase in Young’s modulus. • Strength regression to pre-irradiation value when swelling approaches ~5%.
Mean Coefficient of Thermal Expansion • Irradiation in general increased CTE. • Greater increase in CTE at lower irradiation temperature. Diminishing irradiation effect as irradiation temperature approaches ~700°C. • Defect annealing effect is apparent as temperature exceeds irradiation temperature.
Thermal conductivity • Weak temperature dependence of irradiated thermal conductivity is noted.
Electric Resistivity • Trend of electrical resistivity change may be characterized by a rapid increase followed by prolonged plateau. • ~2.5 times increase appears consistent with IG-110 data by Ishiyama et al. (1996)
Collective Analysis of Microscopic Anisotropy? • Aspect ratios and orientation distributions for pores and filler particles: digital microscopy • Crystallographic orientation distributions for fillers and matrix: ORNL MGEM-2 ellipsometric microscopy • Ratio of reflection Intensity • Angle of maximum intensity low 0° high 180° G347A
Concluding Remarks • Irradiated properties data for Tokai Carbon nuclear grade graphites were presented. • 2nd of 3 PIE campaigns in progress • Highest fluence at 2.7x1026 n/m2 fast (~20 dpa) • Materials so far exhibit decent baseline properties after irradiation. • G347A appears promising for high radiation services • G458A may offer advantage in service life at high temperatures • Anisotropy in irradiation response for “isotropic” graphite needs attention. • Future work • More data coming from 2nd PIE campaign • Final PIE campaign anticipated to start in spring 2014 • Microscopical analyses: unirradiated and irradiated
Technical Progress Summary • Pre-irradiation studies • Draft report under final review • Irradiation program • Progress approximately on schedule • Post-irradiation examination • Campaign 1 complete • Campaign 2 in progress, on schedule • Data appear reasonable (following expected trend) and promising Move to backup
Future Outlook • PIE Campaign 2 • Experimental work will complete soon • Further data analysis to follow • PIE Campaign 3 • After HFIR Operating Cycle 453, expected to start in spring 2014 • Conclusion of technical program anticipated in 2015 Move to backup