270 likes | 383 Views
Public Health Performance Standards District System Assessment. www.cdc.gov/od/ocphp/nphpsp/ Karen O’Rourke, MPH Joan Orr, CHES 2009. Part 1: The National Performance Standards Program. To improve the quality of public health practice and performance of public health systems by:
E N D
Public Health Performance StandardsDistrict System Assessment www.cdc.gov/od/ocphp/nphpsp/ Karen O’Rourke, MPH Joan Orr, CHES 2009
To improve the quality of public health practice and performance of public health systems by: Providing performance standards for public health systems; Promoting continuous quality improvement; Engaging and leveraging partnerships; Strengthening the science base for public health practice improvement Program Vision and Goals
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Background • Began in 1998 • Partnership effort between CDC and five national public health organizations • APHA, ASTHO, NACCHO, NALBOH, NNPHI, PHF • National launch in June 2002 • Tool revised in 2008
The Assessment Instruments • State public health system • Local public health system • Local governance
Four Key Concepts • Based on the ten Essential Public Health services • Focus on the overall public health system • Describe an optimal level of performance • 4. Support a process of quality improvement
Key Concept 1: The Essential Services • Provides a foundation for any public health activity • Describes public health at both the state and local levels • Instruments include sections addressing each essential service
Monitor health status Diagnose and investigate health problems Inform and educate Mobilize communities to address health problems Develop policies and plans Enforce laws and regulations Link people to needed health services Assure a competent health services workforce Evaluate health services Conduct research for new innovations 10 Essential PH Services
Key Concept 2: Focus on the “System” • “Public Health System” • A Network of… • Public entities • Private entities • Voluntary entities • All entities contribute to the health and well-being of the community
The Public Health System Police EMS Corrections MCOs Health Department Philanthropist Churches Community Centers Nursing Homes Home Health Parks Doctors Schools Elected Officials Hospitals Mass Transit Environmental Health Civic Groups CHCs Fire Tribal Health Employers Laboratory Facilities Economic Development Drug Treatment Mental Health
Key Concept 3: Optimal Performance • Each performance standard represents the “gold standard” • Provide benchmarks to which state and local systems can strive to achieve • Stimulate higher achievement
Key Concept 4: Quality Improvement • Standards should result in identification of areas for improvement • Link results to an improvement process
Improves organizational and community communication Provides a benchmark for public health practice improvements Brings partners to same table Promotes cohesion and collaboration Provides a systems view of public health Provide a baseline for Maine’s emerging District Public Health System User Benefits
Part 2:The National Public Health Performance StandardsLocal Assessment
Structure The Tool Focus is on the District Public Health System 10 Chapters Based on essential services Each Essential Service Indicators (components, activities) Model standards (optimal performance) Measures (questions)
Structure • 10 Essential Services • 30 Model Standards • 325 Total Questions (109 questions, 216 sub-questions)
Response Options Response Options No activity Minimal (>0 and 25% or less) Moderate (>25% but no more than 50%) Significant (>50% but no more than 75%) Optimal (Greater than 75%)
The Data Quantitative Scores assigned based on responses Algorithm developed by CDC Qualitative Comments captured Themes developed
Reports Reports include: • Overall Score for each Essential Service • A summary score for each indicator • A score for each component
Example ESPH #7: Link People to Needed Health Services Overall Score : 81.93
Example ESPH #1: Monitor Health Status Overall Score: 62.23
Recording Information • While not an inventory of activities, we will record comments to identify themes and provide a context for the scores • Specific programs, projects or organizations will generally not be included in the final report.
Activities & Timeline 2009 March -June July -August Sept. - Oct Fall Conduct 5 District Assessments Analyze Findings Conduct 3 District Assessments Analyze Findings & Present Reports Maine Center for Public Health
The Process At each of the 3 meetings, we will: • Review the Essential Service Model Standard. • Discuss what each organization does with regard to the model standard within the District. • Identify strengths, weaknesses, gaps and recommendations for improvement or collaboration for the District. • Facilitators will suggest a score upon completion of discussion. This will help ensure consistency across the 8 Districts.
Roles and Responsibilities • Facilitators: • Guide participants through the process • Keep time • Allow everyone to speak • Suggest a score • Record results • Participants • Participate fully in discussion from your organization’s perspective • Keep comments brief (no more than 3 min) • Focus comments only on the indicator being discussed • Help identify strengths, weaknesses, gaps and recommendations