1 / 9

A Structure of the Paper

GLOBALIZATION: Our Fate and Hope Radim Šíp Masaryk Univeristy, Faculty of Education sip@ped.muni.cz. A Structure of the Paper. Three Theses A Historical Excursus A Philosophical Excursus What Shall We Do?. Three theses.

luana
Download Presentation

A Structure of the Paper

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GLOBALIZATION: Our Fate and HopeRadim ŠípMasaryk Univeristy, Faculty of Educationsip@ped.muni.cz

  2. A Structure of the Paper Three Theses A Historical Excursus A Philosophical Excursus What Shall We Do?

  3. Three theses The promise of democracy: many people live relatively independent, autonomous live. The promise of modernity: Self emerges from relations. Many mutually balanced relations create freedom. „Freedom In“. The dark side of modernity: Quick and deep change resulted in an inadequate reaction of Romanticism.

  4. A Historical Eexcursus – literature The parts of this section about life in rural society in the Middle ages and the Early modern period are based on texts: van Dülmen, R. Kultura a každodenní život v ranném novověku. [Culture and Everyday Life in the Early Modern Period]. Praha: Argo, 2006, pp. 13–59. Goetz, H.-W. Život ve středověku [Life in the Middle Ages]. Jinočany: H&H, 2005. Cherubini, G. “Rolník a zemědělství” [Peasant and Agriculture]. In: LeGoff, J. Středověký člověk a jeho svět. [Medieval Men and Their World]. Praha: Vyšehrad, 1999, pp. 101-121. The parts about medieval and early modern life in towns are based on texts: van Dülmen, R. Kultura a každodenní život v ranném novověku. [Culture and Everyday Life in the Early Modern Period]. Praha: Argo, 2006, pp. 61–121. Rossiaud, J. „Měšťan“ [Burgher]. In: LeGoff, J. Středověký člověk a jeho svět. [Medieval Men and Their World]. Praha: Vyšehrad, 1999, pp.123-156. The passages about Modern time societies are based on: Fontana, J. Evropa před zrcadlem [Europe before the Mirror]. Praha: LN, 2001. Foucault, M. Dohlížet a trestat [Discipline and Punish]. Praha: Dauphin, 2000. Gellner, E. Podmínky svobody. [The term sof freedon]. Brno: CDK, 1997. Goody, J. Proměny rodiny v evropské historii. [Transformation of family in the European History]. Praha: LN, 2006. Keller, J. Dějiny klasické sociologie [History of Classic Sociology]. Praha: Slon, 2004. Keller, J. Úvod do sociologie [Introduction to Sociology]. Praha: Slon 2001. Simmel, G. Peníze v moderní kultuře a jiné eseje [Money in the Modern Culture and Other Essays]. Praha: Slon, 1997. And the passages about the late modern societies are based on the texts: Beck, U. Co je to globalizace? Omyly a odpovědi. [What is globalization. Misunderstandings and Answers]. Brno: CDK, 2007. Beck, U. Riziková společnost. [World Risk Society]. Praha: Slon, 2004. Giddens, A. Unikající svět. Jak globalizace mění náš život [Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives]. Praha: Slon, 2000.

  5. A Historical Eexcursus The rural traditional society = dependence on land  political inactive, social rigid, and unchangable versus The town life = dependence on commerce  many relations, many abstract bonds, the to be calculable and legible for others  the lab of the modern time live The shift to the modern society = emergence of the conditions for the modern type of individuality  the conditions for democracy

  6. A Philosophical ExcursusJohn Dewey: Publics and Its Problems Dewey: abolition of individuality = result of many social movements, society in change thanks to „powers of steam and electricity“ the libertarian explanation of the relation I <–>S = the ideology; political construction intentionaly built -> psychology (isolated consciousness), economy (natural law of production and exchange) IF THERE IS ANY CHANGE IN SOCIETY, THERE MUST BE CHANGE IN INDIVIDUALITY AND VICE VERSA (intelligent reconstruction of conditions)  TASKS

  7. What Shall We Do? 5 theses: We need know history for understanding conditons, not for a help. Nationalism was a tool for solvation of the matter of the modern society. It was the inappropriate tool. Disappearing of national „certainty“ is a chance, not a danger. Identity is a malleable function of adjsuting of individual and society. The loose identy is more useful than rigid one in the late modern society.

  8. What Shall We Do? An example: Liessmann´s Theory of Uneducation Criticisms is RIGHT: PISA, ELTC mechanism, standardization of forms and contents of univrsity education. Determination of the core of problem is WRONG: The Myth of the Humboldtian Bildung (= a display of the Romantic nostalgia).

  9. Thank you for your attention

More Related