1 / 12

Ischaemic Heart Disease-Implications of Gender

Ischaemic Heart Disease-Implications of Gender. Dr Kaye Birks School of Rural Health Monash University Australia Gender Competency Training for Medical Educators Seminar, April 2003. Aims. Describe differences between women and men Natural history Clinical presentations Management

luana
Download Presentation

Ischaemic Heart Disease-Implications of Gender

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ischaemic Heart Disease-Implications of Gender Dr Kaye Birks School of Rural Health Monash University Australia Gender Competency Training for Medical Educators Seminar, April 2003

  2. Aims Describe differences between women and men • Natural history • Clinical presentations • Management • Outcome

  3. Natural History of IHD • Cause of death of approximately one third of women • Greater age dependency • Clinical onset is about 10-15 years later than for men

  4. Natural History--Risk Factorsyoung women • Family history maternal IHD • NIDDM • Smoking risk for sudden death • Isolated raised total cholesterol – less risk • Obesity risk ? explained by co-morbidity

  5. Clinical Presentations • In women angina common first presentation [54%] v. men [38%] • Recognised MI [18%] men [30%] • More atypical symptoms • Pain free MI in older diabetic women • More non Q wave infarcts

  6. Clinical Presentations • Older • Co-morbidities • Unstable angina rather than acute MI • Those with infarction less likely to have ST segment elevation

  7. Outcome differences • More likely to die • The younger the women the greater the difference when compared to male cohort • < 50 years twice as likely to die • After CABG younger women mortality 3.4% v. men 1.1% • Over 75 years no difference in mortality

  8. Outcome differences ?why • Women delay in going to hospital • Missed diagnosis on admission • Less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy • More co morbidities • Less likely to receive established treatments e.g. betablockers, aspirin • Higher death rates for men before going to hospital

  9. Outcome differences ?why • Different pathophysiology in premenopausal women • Plaque erosions in young women, plaque rupture in men and older women • Young women have less narrowing of arteries • ?hypercoaguable state or coronary spasm • Transmural MI with normal coronary angiography

  10. Management • Diagnostic testing less specific in younger women • Less likely to have coronary angiography • When performed more likely to have clinically insignificant disease • Less likely to receive primary preventive treatments

  11. Summary Differences in • natural history • presentation • management • outcome

  12. Summary • Important to highlight these differences in the undergraduate curriculum

More Related