1 / 7

2009 -2010 Mission College Program Review Report

2009 -2010 Mission College Program Review Report. Program Review 2009-2010 . Program Review Consisted of Two Parts: Program Review Updates Comprehensive Program Review. Program Review Update . Total of 66 programs completed 22 approved immediately 37 by second deadline

lucas
Download Presentation

2009 -2010 Mission College Program Review Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2009 -2010 Mission College Program Review Report

  2. Program Review 2009-2010 • Program Review Consisted of Two Parts: • Program Review Updates • Comprehensive Program Review

  3. Program Review Update • Total of 66 programs completed • 22 approved immediately • 37 by second deadline • 7 by final deadline All programs participating in Program Review Update are forwarded to GAP with recommendation to participate in the CBAC process.

  4. Comprehensive Program Review • Beta tested a new process for 1st round review • Established Program Review Evaluation Committee consisting of members of Academic Senate, Classified Senate, President’s Council, CBAC, Associated Students, and Student Services Council. • Criteria established • Goals measurable and in relation to college/district goals; reaction to external or internal forces such as enrollment trends & students served.

  5. First-Round Review Results • Exceeds planning expectations • No programs in Fall 2009 • Meets planning expectations • Sociology • Anthropology • Needs further evaluation by GAP • Tech Studies • Work Experience

  6. Identified Issues • What is the definition of a program? • Are Global Studies and Social Science programs? • What happens if a program does not complete Program Review? • Consistent terminology needs to be used across PGC, CBAC, Student Services Council, etc. • In 2010-2011 break apart “bundles” such as Health Occ & Tech Studies • Is Foreign Language a “bundle” or not? • Continue to refine the Program Review process to create a robust, comprehensive planning cycle which ties together curriculum, SLOs, program life-cycle, and resource allocation.

  7. Next Steps • Spring 2010 the committee will work on simplifying forms used for Comprehensive Program Review. • Beta test form in Spring-Summer • Fall 2010 use the same criteria and Program Review Evaluation Committee to perform first-round review.

More Related