1 / 18

COQUALMO Working Group Presentation Presenter: John D. Powell

COQUALMO Working Group Presentation Presenter: John D. Powell. Participants. Moderator: Sunita Chulani-IBM Scribes: John Powell-JPL & Keun Lee-USC Floating Participant: Barry Boehm-USC Participants Michael Crowley-Motorola Kimberly Dobson-Motorola. Jongmoon Baik-Motorola

lucinda
Download Presentation

COQUALMO Working Group Presentation Presenter: John D. Powell

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COQUALMO Working Group Presentation Presenter: John D. Powell

  2. Participants • Moderator: Sunita Chulani-IBM • Scribes: John Powell-JPL & Keun Lee-USC • Floating Participant: Barry Boehm-USC • Participants • Michael Crowley-Motorola • Kimberly Dobson-Motorola • Jongmoon Baik-Motorola • Linda Brooks-TRW • Barbara Hirsh-Motorola • George Huling-LASPIN • Jung-Won Park-USC-CSE • John Serino-BAE Systems • Dick Stutzke-SAIC • Nancy Eickleman-Motorola

  3. Outline • Preliminary Presentation • Brainstorming Session • Identification of Research Issues • Prioritization of Research Topics

  4. Preliminary Presentations • Presentation for those who were unfamiliar with • COQUALMO • Orthogonal Defect Classification (ODC)

  5. The COQUALMO Model Baseline Defect Intro Rates/Ksloc Rqts 10 Rqts 20 Rqts 30 DI_DriverR,1 DI_DriverR,1 QAF = DMR COCOMO II Cost Drivers 10* DAFR 20* DAFD 30* DAFC Analysis Tools Rating DR_DriverR,1 DR_DriverR,2 DR_DriverR,3 Peer Reviews Rating Test Thoroughness and Tool Rating

  6. ODC • Defect Classification, Trigger activities • Signatures of defect rates • Comparison between projects and historical signatures • Take action based on these differences

  7. Brainstorm • ODC • Tailorable to different environments • Modeling for Spiral V. Waterfall Lifecycle • Modeling for Spiral life cycle is harder • Finding the Right Kind of Defect V Counting Defects • Implication for Risk Exposure Assessment

  8. Brainstorm (cont’) • Temporal information about defects may be needed • Account for timing of activities • Implication for cost • Granularity of COQUALMO Calibration • Allow for USC to Collect Data in the form affiliates collect it and make use of it.

  9. Brainstorming (cont’) • Can we compress 8-9 defect categories into 3-4 categories? • Build the capacity into the model to allow for changes in its classification scheme

  10. Identifying Issues/Research Topics • Full ODC Categorization • Cost/Benefit Analysis • Tailorability to waterfall, incremental model • Tailorability to Non-ODC Categories • Eliminating obstacles to data contribution • Reliability/MTBF – Product Model • Process Model

  11. Prioritizing Research Topics

  12. 1. Full ODC Categorization Importance Difficulty

  13. 2. Cost/Benefit Analysis Importance Difficulty

  14. 3. Tailorability to waterfall, incremental model Importance Difficulty

  15. 4. Tailorability to Non-ODC Categories Importance Difficulty

  16. 5. Eliminating obstacles to data contribution Importance Difficulty

  17. 6. Reliability/MTBF – Product Model Importance Difficulty

  18. 7. Process Model Importance Difficulty

More Related