1 / 1

[Se]in and [Se]out : initial and final supernatant Se concentration

No association of Se 0 with purified Boom Clay Humic Acid (p-BCHA). pH-pe diagram [Se] tot = 10 -6 mol l -1 (NEA database project 2006). Se 0. Se(IV). Se 0 + p-BCHA + Fe(II); pellet. Se 0 + p-BCHA ; pellet. Se(IV) + p-BCHA + N 2 H 4 ; spn; pH 7.25.

ludwig
Download Presentation

[Se]in and [Se]out : initial and final supernatant Se concentration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. No association of Se0 with purified Boom Clay Humic Acid (p-BCHA) pH-pe diagram [Se]tot = 10-6 mol l-1 (NEA database project 2006) Se0 Se(IV) Se0 + p-BCHA + Fe(II); pellet Se0 + p-BCHA ; pellet Se(IV) + p-BCHA + N2H4;spn; pH 7.25 Se(IV) + p-BCHA + N2H4;spn; pH 5.25 Sample Description Solid/Liquid [Se]in (M) [Se]out (M) [Se]S (mol/kg) pH 3 FeS2 < 10 µm NPT 100 g·l-1 6.1010-3 4.8010-5 6.11×10-2 7.80 4 FeS2 < 10 µm PT 100 g·l-1 6.1010-3 8.63×10-4 5.25×10-2 7.42 • Sorption-Reduction by Fe(II) containing minerals (FeS2, FeS, …) * • Batch tests of SeO32‑ with pure pyrite (FeS2) in synthetic Boom Clay water (no OM) • Selenium on FeS2 solid phase (mol g‑1) versus SeO32‑ concentration (mol dm‑3). • Short contact times (3 and 7 days) : linear Kd  sorption process • Longer contact times : progressive convergeance to 3 × 10‑9 mol dm‑3  reduction process. Sorption-reduction of SeO32‑ on pyrite (FeS2) Sample Description Solid/Liquid [Se]in (M) [Se]out (M) [Se]S (mol/kg) pH TIME 9 FeS < 100 µm NPT 100 g·l-1 6.0810-3 < 10-6 > 6.10×10-2 7.89 10 FeS < 100 µm PT 100 g·l-1 6.0710-3 < 10-6 > 6.6810-2 mol/kg 7.86 • Sorption on oxidic surfaces (edges) of clay minerals SeO3-2 sorption on Illite du Puy (10 g/l; 0.01 N NaCl) • Association of Se with Boom Clay Organic Matter TIME State-of-the-art regarding selenium geochemistry under Boom Clay conditions Bruggeman, C.; Breynaert E.; Maes, A Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Laboratory for Colloid Chemistry, Kasteelpark Arenberg 23, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium Se Redox Chemistry Se(0) • Oxidising Conditions • Selenate (SeO42-) • Weakly adsorbed on oxide surfaces • Reduction kinetically hindered / poorly known • No solubility limitation • Mildy Oxidising Conditions • Selenite (SeO32-) • Strongly adsorbed on oxide surfaces • Reduction faster than SeO4-2, important process for storage • No solubility limitation Se(IV) + p-BCHA + N2H4;pellet; pH 5.25 • Reduction of SeO3-2 to Se0 by pyrite (FeS2) • Reducing Conditions • Se0 , Selenide (Se2-) • Limited solubility • Not well known • [Se]in and [Se]out : initial and final supernatant Se concentration • PT and NPT: samples pretreated and not pretreated with 1M HCl after crushing • XAS analysis, Se K-edge (12.658 keV), fluorescence mode Se(VI) • No significant reduction or sorption by Boom Clay components : • Illite • Pyrite • HS Se(IV) Se(-II) • Formation of FeSe by reduction of SeO3-2 by FeS, 18 days equilibrium * Selenite reduction in Boom clay: Effect of FeS2, clay minerals and dissolved organic matter. Bruggeman C, Maes A, Vancluysen J and P. Vandemussele. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION 137 (2): 209-221 • [Se]in and [Se]out : initial and final supernatant Se concentration • PT and NPT: samples pretreated and not pretreated with 1M HCl after crushing • XAS analysis, Se K-edge (12.658 keV), fluorescence mod • Short term (1 day) batch sorption edges of Se(IV) on illite du Puy • Typical anion adsorption edges • Conclusions • Under BK conditions • Se(VI)  unaltered • Se(IV)  initial sorption on oxidic surfaces  reduction by FeS2 • Knowledge Gaps ? •  Se(VI) sorption on Boom Clay  Se(IV) sorption/reduction on CaCO3/FeCO3phases  Se speciation on Boom Clay solid phase • Association increases with time  speciation/valence ? Acknowledgements: ONDRAF/NIRAS – TRANCOM II – FUNMIG – FWO/NWO

More Related