1 / 18

Parameters

Design Considerations at Phase A and Beyond. C assegrain U ltraviolet B razilian E SO S pectrograph. Parameters. Design team : Beatriz Barbuy Bruno Castilho Hans Dekker Bernard Delabre Clemens Gneiding Jean - Louis Lizon Vanessa B. P. Macanhan Roland Reiss Joël Vernet

lukas
Download Presentation

Parameters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Design Considerations at Phase A and Beyond Cassegrain Ultraviolet Brazilian ESO Spectrograph Parameters Design team: Beatriz Barbuy Bruno Castilho Hans Dekker Bernard Delabre Clemens Gneiding Jean-Louis Lizon Vanessa B. P. Macanhan Roland Reiss JoëlVernet Phase A team: Florian Kerber, GeroRuprecht, HaraldKuntschner Challenges in UV Astronomy, October 2013 Paul Bristow

  2. Overview • Requirements that drive the design • Achieving high efficiency • Opto-mechanical design • Slicer • Detector Array • Optical Bench • Atmospheric Dispersion Compensation • Calibration • Summary

  3. Not so many parameters • In geometry there’s no 3D object much simpler than a CUBE (fully described by one parameter): • Except maybe a SPHERE (ESO’s already got one, nearly); • or a TETRAHEDRON…. • Simple means: • Quicker • Less risk • Cheaper • Easier to operate • Easier to calibrate

  4. “TTTLRS” • Top Three Top Level Requirements • Significantly improve upon throughput (or better S/N) of existing ground based UV spectrographs – USP! • Achieve R≥20,000 • Cover the wavelength range 310-360nm (302-385nm) • Actually four…: • VLT => • 8m Diameter collecting area • Paranal seeing and extinction • Interface with VLT infrastructure • “Campaign mode”

  5. Achieving high efficiency • Atmosphere • Optical design • Cass focus • Slicer (no AO) • Single dispersive element • Minimum surfaces • Grating • Detector Airmass= 1.0 1.3 1.8 Cassegrain ~77% Nasmyth ~65% ~20%

  6. Comparison to FORS2,UVES & X-shooter

  7. Choices arising from TTTLRs

  8. Evolving Opto-mechanical Design: Detector Array • Long detector array: • 3 or 4 × 4K × 2K × 15μm × 15μm • ~250mm x 30mm (~200pix gaps) • Large (but feasible) detector vessel • One mode (plus interlace): • No pre-disperser, grating operating in 1st order =>no tuneable wavelength range (without losing efficiency) • Several methods of recovering the wavelengths that fall into the detector gaps are under consideration

  9. Evolving Opto-mechanical Design: Slicer • Phase A slicer design had three very efficient slitlets • Smaller slitlets: • Larger wavelength range for given detector array size and resolving power • More slitlets needed => signal spread over more pixels • Detailed Simulations to investigate optimal number of slitlets and their widths: • Binning, RON, Dark current • Integration times, Targets • Seeing, Sky brightness

  10. Evolving Opto-mechanical Design: Slicer

  11. Evolving Opto-mechanical Design: Slicer • MUSE style slicer, >=7 slices; <=0.3” slitlet widths 3 x 0.45” 5 x 0.35” 7 x 0.25” 7 x 0.35” V=19 QSO

  12. Evolving Opto-mechanical Design: Optical Bench

  13. Evolving Opto-mechanical Design: Camera and DV

  14. Evolving Opto-mechanical Design: Pre-slicer

  15. Evolving Opto-mechanical Design: ADC? • Observe along parallactic (default) • Flexure easier to handle • Airmass restrictions anyway

  16. Evolving Opto-mechanical Design: Calibration Unit • Talk by Florian Kerber on LDLS for flats • Potential wavecal sources, Hollow Cathode Lamps: • Th-Ar or Th-Ne • Pt/Cr-Ne • Tellurics for absolute wavelength ZP? • Simultaneous wavelength calibration? • Repeatability/stability • Automatic flexure compensation • Stray light • To be decided…

  17. Summary • The CUBES design is dedicated to providing significant SNR improvement relative to existing ground based UV spectrographs • CUBES will be easy to build, easy to operate and maintain and easy to calibrate

  18. End of Talk

More Related