1 / 53

Chapter 7: Kinetic Isotope Effects I. Isotope Effects A. Equilibrium Isotope Effects

Chapter 7: Kinetic Isotope Effects I. Isotope Effects A. Equilibrium Isotope Effects. RSH + R'OD RSD + R'OH K eq = 0.4-0.5. 14 NH 4 + + 15 NH 3 14 NH 3 + 15 NH 4 + K eq = 1.0393 .

lupita
Download Presentation

Chapter 7: Kinetic Isotope Effects I. Isotope Effects A. Equilibrium Isotope Effects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 7: Kinetic Isotope Effects I. Isotope Effects A. Equilibrium Isotope Effects RSH + R'OD RSD + R'OH Keq = 0.4-0.5 14NH4+ + 15NH314NH3 + 15NH4+ Keq = 1.0393 H12CN + 13CN- H13CN + 12CN- Keq = 1.026

  2. B. Kinetic Isotope Effects (L = H or D)

  3. II. Isotope Effect Theory A. Equilibrium Isotope Effects K1 R1 P1 K2 R2 P2 Qtot = QtrQrotQvibQele0tot =e0el +e0vib Since Qel = 1: Qtot = QtrQrotQvib

  4. Born-Oppenheimer Approximation:

  5. Substituting partition functions and vibrational zero-point energies: MMI EXC ZPE ui = hi/kT i  reactant indexl  product index

  6. MMI = isotope effects on translation and rotation. ZPE = isotope effects on i at 0 K. EXC = isotope effects on population of vibrational excited states at T (density of vibrational states).

  7. ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ B. Kinetic Isotope Effects K1‡ A1 ‡1 P1 K2‡ A2 ‡2 P2

  8. ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Approximations: κ1κ2, m2‡/m1‡  m2/m1, I2‡/I1‡  I2/I1; for i> 500 cm-1 e-ui < 0.08 at 25 C and  EXC  1.

  9. ‡ Rules: 1. Isotopically heavier molecule has lower ZPE. 2. ZPE between isotopic isomers increases as f increases. 3. Heavier isotope accumulates in the state where binding is stronger (e.g. for C-L, where vibrational well is steeper). 4. Lighter isotope accumulates where binding is weaker. 5. ZPE is greatest for hydrogen isotopes.

  10. ‡ ‡ D0,D De0,H III. Primary Hydrogen Isotope Effects A. Simplest Model

  11. ‡ ‡ ‡ kH/kD = e-ZPEH,D/kT ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ All of reactant state ZPEH,D is lost in the transition state: ZPEH,D = e0,H - e0,D ‡ Since 0,H = 0,D: ‡ ‡

  12. For H = 3000 cm-1 D = 2200 cm-1 kH/kD = 6.75

  13. B. Westheimer-Melander Model 1. Background ‡ Linear Transition State Four transition state vibrations are considered, two stretches and two degenerate bends.

  14. Stretches: r1 r2 Antisymmetric C………H………B r1 – r2  Symmetric C………H………Br1 + r2  ‡

  15. r1 r2 r1 + r2 r1 – r2 E C:- H+-B C-H :B

  16. 2. Variation of Primary Isotope Effect with Extent of Proton Transfer C……H…………BReactant-like transition state  CHBSymmetric transition state  C…………H……BProduct-like transition state  

  17. CHB CDB Isotopic ZPE difference remains in the transition state. C-H C-D

  18. Extent of proton transfer varies as the basicity of the base increases. Why? Consider Hammond’s Postulate: d-d+ [CHB]‡  

  19. Consider the symmetric stretch of the transition state: Short-Dashed Line: pKaC-H<< pKaHB+ [CHB]‡  Early transition state Solid Line: pKaC-H ~ pKaHB+ [CHB]‡   Symmetrical transition state Long-Dashed Line: pKaC-H >> pKaHB+ [CHB]‡  Late transition state

  20. 3. Example: Base-catalyzed ester enolate formation resonance stabilized

  21. fCH = 608 J m-2 fBH = 712 J m-2 λ = 63200 J mol-1 G‡int = 15800 J mol-1 Reference: Barnes and Bell, Proc. Royal Soc. London, Ser. A318, 421 (1970)

  22. ‡ ‡ ‡ 4. Marcus Theory of Isotope Effects: DGH‡ - DGD‡ = NDZPEH,D‡ = NDe0,H‡ -NDe0,D‡ ‡ f1 = fCH(1 - x‡) f2 = fBHx‡

  23. ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ kH/kD = e-DZPEH,D/kT

  24. C. Other Factors 1. Additional Transition State Vibrational Modes Two degenerate bending modes Transition state bending motions decrease kH/kD. + - +

  25. Nonlinear transition state Symmetric stretch not separable from bending motions. Common for H- transfer reactions

  26. 2. Quantum Mechanical Tunneling • = 2p2mn/h x = r - req Barrier is narrower for C-H species. Ψ2 for C-H falls off more slowly with increasing x than does C-D.

  27. IV. Isotope Effects on Multistep Reactions * denotes isotopically sensitive step

  28. DkobskobsH/kobsD (observed isotope effect) Dk3 k3H/k3D (intrinsic isotope effect) Dkobs = f1 + f3 Dk3 wherein f1 and f3 are fractions of rate determination by k1 and k3, respectively.

  29. k3>> k2 kobs = k1 k3<< k2 kobs = k1k3/k2 f1 = 1 Dkobs = 1 f3 = 1 Dkobs = Dk3

  30. A. Electrophilic Aromatic Substitutions

  31. B. H/D Exchange of Toluene

  32. Applying the steady-state approximation:

  33. V. Heavy Atom Isotope Effects

  34. Example 1: Decarboxylation of 2-Benzoyl Propionic Acid k12/k14 isotope effects C-1: 1.074 C-2: 1.051 C-3: 1.000

  35. Mechanistic Rationale: Stepwise reaction can also explain the isotope effects.

  36. Example 2: Nucleophilic Displacement of Cl- From p-Nitrobenzyl Chloride Nu: = H2O k35/k37 = 1.0076 Nu: = -CN k35/k37 = 1.0057

  37. Example 3: Baeyer-Villager Oxidation of Acetophenone Stepwise mechanism:

  38. Concerted mechanism: k12/k14 = 1.048  0.002 at 32 C Isotope effect is consistent with the concerted mechanism.

  39. VI. Secondary Isotope Effects The bond to the isotopic atom is neither made nor broken in the kinetic or equilibrium process. A. -Deuterium Isotope Effects

  40. L OH C C O H L H L -CL sigma bond electrons are delocalized by hyperconjugation in sp2 reactant. Hyperconjugation is no longer possible in sp3 product.

  41. D3k  kH3/kD3 = 0.90 D3k = (D3Khyd)F F = 0.65

  42. B. Factors Affecting the Magnitude of -D Effects 1. Demand for Hyperconjugation kH3/kD3 = 1.89 (1.24 per D)  Transition state resembles ion pair or carbonium ion:

  43. 2. Dependence on Dihedral Angle kH/kD = 1.14 per D at L1. kH/kD = 0.99 per D at L2.

  44. C. -Deuterium Effects

  45. Why? Streitwieser Model

More Related