3P Services, Germany

1. 3P Services, Germany Basil Hostage The missing link – inspecting the final critical section of a large crude transmission and export system

2. DGMK-Vortrag 30.04.1999 In-line inspection since 1992 MFL world wide initially specialized on small diameter tools (4“ to 10“) today 3“ to 42“ …

4. Ocensa‘s offshore pipeline

5. Ocensa‘s offshore pipeline

6. Integrity assessment selected by Ocensa Internal inspection tool capable of Detecting corrosion and deformation Anomalies including dents, gouges and grooves

7. Necessary considerations • Cleaning • Remove internally for old deposits of sands, wax and sediments. • Restrictions identifications • No impacts to crude oil transport program • No receiver trap installed • No environmental impacts • Inspection metal loss with a High Resolution Tool • Sizing and location accuracy. GPS location. Detection of anomalies on welds

8. Necessary considerations • Identification and location of mechanical anomalies • Identify, locate and size dents,ovality, wrinkles, deformations. • Identify possible defects in the pipe were the intelligent tool could be stuck. • Processing and analyze data • Review the data, identify defects, prioritize and define plan to go forward. • Anomalies assessment according B31G and R Streng • Finding’s repairs . • Data validation and repairs according with the report and priority

9. Inspection and cleaning technology • Cleaning • Gel • Conventional • BiDi • Inspection • Umbilical • Conventional • BiDi

10. ILI Background • Contacts with operators with Offshore In Line Inspection experience • In Line inspection vendors • Risk Assessment In Line Inspection Technologies • Technologies Assessment • Risk Assessment for Receiver Trap installation • Facilities required, trap mobilization and installation, environmental impacts • Risk Assessment for Operation • Submarine valves, flow backward, use tanker storage

11. ILI Background • Risk Assessment Pigging • Quality of cleaning, pigging alternatives evaluation, pigging program design • Discussion about procedures, logistics and equipments required • Operation, transport, control center, maintenance, environmental, Terminal and integrity. • Final Risk Assessment to define best ILI and pigging alternative with all areas.

12. Selected ILI technology • Bidirectional Tool. • No required receiver trap installation. • High Resolution Tool. • High number and density of sensors, accuracy. • Classification ID/OD discrimination. • Boxing,clustering and interaction analysis.

13. Selected ILI technology • Metal loss correlation with mechanical anomalies. • Excellent accuracy and probability of detection. • Sizing Accuracy( Manual and Auto) • Anomalies location with (GPS) • Inspection coverage (100%) • Interpretation and assessment of data

14. Ocensa‘s work scope • Max preparationforcleaning • MFL, GEO and XYZ • Completetrackingandmarkering • Safe navigationnearthe PLEM • = thefullprogram

15. Project conclusion • Issuestobecovered • Contract • Technical planning • Logistics • Job execution • Data analysis & reporting • Verification • Veryambitious time schedule

16. Project conclusion • Howcouldthiswork? • OCENSA: large pipelineoperator • 3P Services: smallcontractor, faraway

17. Answers • Carefultechnologyanalysisanddecisionby OCENSA • Contract: OCENSA respected 3P‘s specificneeds • High flexibilityof 3P Services, sincesmall • OCENSA madesystematicuseof 3P‘s experience • High professional skillsofthe individuals involved

18. Markers and antennae

19. Pig launcher Coveñas

20. BiDi cleaning pig

21. Launching the GEO tool

22. 42“ MFL tool

23. Vertical profile of land section

24. Pig speed profile

25. Pig recorded pressure profile

26. Bi-directional MFL applications

33. Thanks for your attention