1 / 17

Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop on the Cross-border Disaster eResponse in the eRegion: Interoperability of Information Systems of the Organizations Involved http://eLivingLab.org/Safe/Workshop

lynn-holman
Download Presentation

Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop on the Cross-border Disaster eResponse in the eRegion: Interoperability of Information Systems of the Organizations Involved http://eLivingLab.org/Safe/Workshop Jože GričareCenter Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of v MariborGricar@FOV.Uni-Mb.si http://eCenter.FOV.Uni-Mb.si/Gricar, http://eLivingLab.org

  2. Cross-borderServices in the EU: Procurement Invoicing Marketplaces Government Logistics Health Disaster Response Learning Inclusion Parliament Everything Do we have a problem?Are there innovative opportunities?

  3. Disaster eResponse Initiative Draft Memorandum of Safe and Secure eRegion http://eLivingLab.org/Safe/Memorandum.htm Ljubljana, July 2005 Virtual Cross-border Disaster Response Living Lab in the eRegion http://eCenter.FOV.Uni-Mb.si/MerkurDay November 2007 Workshops on Cross-border Disaster eResponse in the eRegion 2004 - 2009

  4. Cross-border Disaster e Response in the eRegion Stakeholders • Caritas • Customs Administration • Emergency Ambulance Service • Fire Fighter Association • Insurance Association • Intelligence and Security Agency • Ministry of Defence & General Staff, Armed Forces • Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning • Ministry of Foreign Affairs • Ministry of Health • Ministry of Interior & Police • Ministry of Public Administration • Ministry of Transport • Protection and Rescue Administration • Radio and TV • Red Cross • Society for Emergency Medicine • Mobile services provider • University • University Medical Center

  5. eRegionIn the eRegion business & government organizations, as well as individuals, extensively use eTechnologiesin order to support their work

  6. eRegion - various perspectivesFrom a small business perspective, eRegion is an area of about 100 kilometers around the company’s location. From a large company’s perspective, eRegion is an area of some 200-500 kilometers around the company’s locationFrom the Knowledge Village perspective, eRegion is the area of about 5 hours air flight to/from Dubai, Arab Emirates. .

  7. European transport corridors No. 5 & No. 10

  8. Cross-border Baltic Region Sweden is one of the strongest advocates for aspecial EU Baltic strategy, and I am pleased to tell you that the strategy is one of my government's top priorities in the discussions with France and the Czech Republic for our common presidency work programme. Dr. Cecilia Malmström: The EU-strategy for the Baltic Sea Region under the Swedish Presidency. Baltic Sea Region Conference, Rostock 05 February 2009, http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/7972/a/120204

  9. Closed Authoritarian Top Down Central Planning Command & Control Bureaucratic Rigid Monopolist Open Individual/Freedom Bottom up Participation Collaboration, Self Organization Common Sense Flexible/Adaptable Competition - Innovation Open or Closed Philosophy/Concept/Attitudes/Values

  10. Innovation moving out of the Lab Closed Innovation: Centralized inward looking innovation Open Innovation: Externally focused, collaborative innovation Innovation Networks: Ecosystem centric, cross-organizational innovation Adopted from Richard Straub, IBM & Open Innovation Service Policy Group

  11. User as “Research-Object” Observation and Surveying Prototype Development Testing (Usability, Feasibility, Market Testing) Piloting User as Innovator Interactive User Feed-back Incremental User Innovation Ideas User Idea Generation User Community Innovation Service by Definition “Co-creation” The Rise of the User Industry R&D Led User & User Community Led Consumers >>> Contributors >>> Innovators Adopted from Richard Straub, IBM & Open Innovation Service Policy Group

  12. A missing link in innovation Phase 2 Prototype Phase 0 Research Phase 1 Solutionproposal Phase 4 Commercial product/service Phase 3 Pre-commercial product/service Innovation “no man’s land” Research push Market pull Presented by Veli-Pekka Niitamo, NOKIA & ENoLL, Bled eConference June 5, 2007

  13. Cross-bordereServices in the EU: eProcurement eInvoicing eMarketplaces eGovernment eLogistics eHealth Disaster eResponse eLearning eInclusion eParliament eEverything There are interoperability problems !In the eEU, innovative eServices are needed

  14. The Helsinki Manifesto“We have to move fast, before it is too late”http://eLivingLab.org/files/Helsinki_Manifesto_201106.pdfNovember 20, 2006 Implementation of European Network of Living Labs - ENoLLThe required measure No. 1

  15. The Helsinki ManifestoTwelve most supported measures1. Implementation of a European Network of Living Labs2. Reap the benefits of re-using bank infrastructure for the e-invoicing 3. Break down internal boarders for ICT services 4. Renewing of the European innovation system5. Creation of a market for innovative products and services 6. Focus on services innovation, and establish services science, management and engineering as an academic discipline 7. Concrete funding and support for technology start-ups8. Ensure data integration between IT-solutions 9. Intensify integration of retail banking market (Payments Services Directive) 10. Implementation of European wide compatible e-invoicing system 11. Move from an organization-centered system to a citizen-centered system12. Bring people actively to the information society (ICT skills to 10 million adult people in Europe over a 3-year period).

  16. Opportunities in Open Innovation Experience Sharing in the eRegions • Which components, solutions, or operations successful in one eRegion could be copied, which could be followed, and which are not applicable at all in another eRegion? • Can some guidelines for successful copying be defined and generalized for better understanding of the potential of the open innovation as a concept and as a practice in an eRegion? • How relevant are the outstanding business, government, and academic leaders to the eRegions awareness creation, policy making, or solutions implementation? • Can the neighboring countries facing tensions or conflicts gain benefits if helped in, or pushed into an eRegion development and innovative experimenting in the LLs?

More Related