440 likes | 814 Views
Presentation Outline. Plant OverviewWater ReusePotable Water ConservationElectrical Distribution UpgradesPerformance Based Energy ContractBGE Load Response ProgramOn-Site Bleach GenerationFuture Energy Considerations. Back River WWTP. Built in 1907 on 466-acre tract located in eastern Baltimore CountyDesign flow 180 MGDAverage flow 140 MGD140 sq. mile service area/1.3 million customersTwo outfalls-Back River and Sparrows PointAnnual O
E N D
1. CITY OF BALITMOREDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSBACK RIVER WWTP ENERGY INITIATIVES AND
INNOVATIVE PRACTICES
2. Presentation Outline Plant Overview
Water Reuse
Potable Water Conservation
Electrical Distribution Upgrades
Performance Based Energy Contract
BGE Load Response Program
On-Site Bleach Generation
Future Energy Considerations
3. Back River WWTP Built in 1907 on 466-acre tract located in eastern Baltimore County
Design flow 180 MGD
Average flow 140 MGD
140 sq. mile service area/1.3 million customers
Two outfalls-Back River and Sparrows Point
Annual O & M budget - $50 million
300 employees
% Removal Efficiencies FY-08
BOD 99%, SS 99%, TP 94%, TN 68%
4. PLANT AERIAL VIEW
5. BACK RIVER FACILITIES
6. Water Reuse Overview Sparrows Point approached City to use Back River effluent for process water at steel plant.
In 1941 Back River and Sparrows Point Steel Plant entered into a Water Reuse Agreement.
SP currently takes approximately 40 MGD of Back River’s final effluent.
SP reimburses the City for electrical, chlorine and water costs ~ $950,000 per year.
Current steel plant owner is Severstal
7. BS Sparrows Point PlantBackground Built in 1887 on 3500 acre tract of land with frontage on the Patapsco River
Location selected so ships could off-load raw materials and transport finished product
Produced steel plates, strip steel, sheet steel, and tin plate
Plant has downsized since its heyday in the 1950’s when it employed over 30,000 people
8. Water Reuse Agreement - History Bethlehem Steel needed larger supply of water than available from ordinary sources
Original Agreement executed in 1941
Bethlehem Steel constructed 4.5 mile 60” pipeline to convey water
Max rate of 50 MGD
1947 amended to 100 MGD max
9. Water Reuse Agreement - History 1951 amended to 100 MGD min – 200 max
- built additional 96” pipeline
- built treatment facilities at Back River to further treat effluent
Mid-1980’s abandoned treatment facilities.
Flow gradually has been reduced over time to the current level of 40 – 45 MGD
Agreement can be cancelled by either party with a two year notification.
10. LIFT PUMPS
11. Name of creek?Name of creek?
12. Effluent Water Uses at BS Currently takes ~ 40 MGD of Back River final effluent for process water
Used in various steel production processes
Cooling and cleaning of hot gas streams
After use the water is treated at their Humphrey’s Creek Facility prior to discharge into the Chesapeake Bay
16. Need to verify numbersNeed to verify numbers
17. Waste Pickle Liquor Agreement 1979 initial agreement – Bethlehem Steel’s waste product used for P removal at Back River
40,000 gal/day
City constructed loading, storage and dosing facilities at Back River
Trucking costs were split
1982 amended – City pays 2/3 trucking and Bethlehem Steel 1/3
18. Waste Pickle Liquor Agreement
1986 amended – City pays 100% trucking
December 2000 – changed from ferrous sulfate to ferrous chloride
Ferrous chloride a preferred product due to decreased acidy and higher iron content
Reduced quantity to less than 10,000 gallons/day
Current average usage is 8,000 gallons/day
21. POTABLE WATER CONSEVATION Plant has converted pump seal water systems and polymer mixing systems from potable water to plant flushing water
Saves over 100,000 gpd of potable water
Potable water still used as backup source
Saves over 36.5 million gallons of potable water per year
Annual savings of over $50,000 Need picturesNeed pictures
22. Seal Water System
23. Poly-Blend System
24. ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION UPGRADES SC- 9555 Electrical Distribution Upgrade
$4,000,000 capital cost
Installed four new 34.5 kV capacitor banks to maintain power factor between 0.9 and 0.98
Upgraded the 13.2 and 2.4 kV feeders to 34.5kV
Standardize entire plant distribution system to 34.5kV
SC- 835 Blower House 2 Controls System Improvement
$1,800,000 capital cost
Replaced across the line starters with soft starts
Replaced blower and guide vane controls
These projects improved energy efficiency and increased system reliability
25. ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING Mechanism to implement necessary infrastructure improvements that reduce energy consumption and operating costs.
Financed through operating budget utility savings.
No impact to capital funding program.
Performance and savings guaranteed.
26. ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING PROCESS Preliminary Feasibility Study
Share information and identify potential savings
Phase 1 Agreement
Lists ECMs and potential savings
Develops costs for Phase 1 Proposal
Phase 1 Proposal
Completes detailed energy audit, project scope, savings and final proposal
Phase 2 Agreement
Complete design followed by construction
After construction, measurement and verification data collected and reconciled annually
Call Rick or Mark for detailsCall Rick or Mark for details
27. PROJECT RESULTS Project Cost = $14.1 Million
$1.8 Million in Annual Energy and Operational savings in first year
Sustainable and reliable solution
Funded through savings in operating budget
Increased equipment redundancy and reliability
Demonstrates BRWWTP’s commitment to energy conservation
Check numbers and expandCheck numbers and expand
28. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM) ECM #1 - Digester Gas Utilization
ECM # 2 - Digester Recirculation Pump Improvements
ECM # 3 - HVAC Improvements
ECM # 4 - Direct Digital Ventilation Controls
ECM # 5 - Lighting Improvements
ECM # 6 - Water Conservation
29. ECM #1 DIGESTER GAS UTILIZATION Digester Gas Conditioning
Two new gas conditioning skids for cleaning,
drying and siloxane removal
Engine Generators
Three 1 MW Waukesha Enginators designed for landfill and digester gas
Recovery Steam Generators (HRSGs)
Capture waste heat from engine exhaust to produce low pressure steam
30. ECM #1 DIGESTER GAS UTILIZATION Plant biogas needs will be met first and all excess biogas will be used by generators.
Generators sized to handle annual average of 1.1 million cubic feet of gas per day.
Electricity generated must be used on-site and can’t be fed back to grid (Interconnect Agreement)
Cogen Facility will be operated and maintained by JCI under a Maintenance Agreement
31. ECM #1 DIGESTER GAS UTILIZATION Financial and Operational Benefits
Clean gas will be available throughout site.
Improved reliability of HVAC and process boilers due to clean gas.
Convert wasted flared biogas to electricity.
Heat recovery/steam generation results in more digester gas available to engines.
Sustainable and reliable solution.
Produces 20% of Plant’s electrical requirements
34. ECM # 2 DIGESTER RECIRCULATION PUMP ESD Recirculation Pump Improvement
Replace one vortex pump in each digester
Replace with a Hidrostal pump
Energy consumption reduced by 55 HP 55 hp each?55 hp each?
35. ECM #3 HVAC IMPROVEMENTS 320 ton York absorption chiller boiler unit
125 gallon domestic water heater
Split system heat pump with programmable thermostat
2 cast iron sectional hot water boilers
Benefits
More efficient use of digester gas
Increased equipment service life
Reduced maintenance and improved redundancy
36. ECM #4 DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL/VENTILATION OPTIMIZATION Direct Digital Control
Metasys energy management system (EMS)
Lab exhaust fan monitoring and control
Ventilation Optimization
Establish schedule and ventilation rates for fan systems
Optimize return and outside air ratios
Electric Unit Heaters
New non-adjustable fixed range thermostats
37. ECM #5 LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS Energy efficient electronic ballast
Occupancy sensors for low use areas.
Re-lamping/ re-ballast existing fixtures with 28W T8 lamps and magnetic ballasts.
Replace metal halide & high pressure sodium fixtures with energy efficient high output T5 fixtures.
LED exit signs. How many lights changed out?How many lights changed out?
38. ECM # 6 WATER CONSERVATION Installation of the following water conservation devices
Replace 3.5 gpf toilets with 1.6 gpf low flush toilets and flush valves
Replace 4 gpm shower heads with 2.5 gpm reduced flow shower heads
0.5 gpm aerators on restroom sinks
Water less urinals in Administration Bld.
39. SUMMARY OF ANNUAL SAVINGS (Year 1) ECM 1 Digester Gas Utilization $1,630,000
ECM 2 ESD Recirculation Pump 15,145
ECM 3 HVAC Improvements 32,250
ECM 4 Digital HVAC Control 46,500
ECM 5 Lighting Improvements 81,350
ECM 6 Water Conservation 1,050
TOTAL $1,806,000
40. BGE’s RIDER 24 LOADRESPONSE PROGRAM Customers that can reduce electric loads during peak demands receive credits on bill for enrolling
Credits based on amount of load reduction
1,000 kw load reduction worth $70,000/yr
Customers can participate by either shutting down equipment or running generators
Maximum load response is 10 times per year for up to 6 hours. (Monday-Friday)
Average number of activations over past 6 years was1.6 requests per year
41. WWFD ENROLLMENT Location Capacity (kw) Annual Credit ($)
Back River 2,000 144,682
Patapsco 1,366 98,329
Eastern Ave PS 433 31,869
Jones Falls PS 250 18,400
Dundalk PS 115 8,454
TOTAL SAVINGS $301,734
42. ONSITE BLEACH GENERATION Construction of bleach/chlorine gas generation facility of maximum 15,000 #/day equivalent chlorine.
Hybrid system which produces chlorine gas for immediate use, 12 % bleach and excess caustic soda.
Estimated project cost $18.5 million
Excess caustic use in scrubbers and future ENR
Project payback less than 6 years
Estimated production cost for #chlorine $0.40 vs. bulk delivery cost of $0.97.
43. FUTURE ENERGY CONSIDERATIONS Solar Power
Hydrogen Gas Utilization from OSBG
Digestion Process Enhancements
Possible 4th Enginator
Biodiesel production from scum and grease
44. QUESTIONS?