1.05k likes | 1.74k Views
Introduction to Sociology SOC-101. Unit 6 – Social Groups and Formal Organizations. Social Groups. Most people seek a sense of belonging, which is the experience of group membership Aggregate
E N D
Introduction to Sociology SOC-101 Unit 6 – Social Groups and Formal Organizations
Social Groups • Most people seek a sense of belonging, which is the experience of group membership • Aggregate • Individuals who temporarily share the same physical space but who do not see themselves belonging together • For example, people in an elevator, a commuter train, or standing in a line at the store • Category • Individuals who share the same characteristics • For example, students, homeowners, millionaires, blondes, etc.
Social Groups • Social Group • Two or more people who identify and interact with one another • They contain people with shared experiences, loyalties, and interests • Charles Cooley (1909) came up with two types of social groups based on their members’ degree of genuine personal concern and loyalty for each other • Primary Groups • Secondary Groups
Primary Groups • Primary Group • A group characterized by intimate, long-term, face-to-face association and cooperation among its members • People share personal and enduring relationships and show real concern towards each other • The family is a primary group
Primary Groups • Members of primary groups tend to influence our socialization process by shaping our behavior, attitudes, and values • Sense of Belonging • With primary groups, we feel a sense of attachment, belonging • The group is seen as an end in itself rather than a means to other ends • Each member is considered unique and irreplaceable
Secondary Groups • Secondary Group • A larger, relatively temporary, more anonymous, formal, and impersonal group based on some interest or activity • Involve weak personal ties and little personal knowledge of one another • Many of these groups are short term, a “means to an end” • Unlike primary groups which have a personal orientation, secondary groups have a goal orientation • “What can they do for us?” type of attitude • We also tend to “keep score” in secondary groups of what we give others and what we receive in return
In-Groups and Out-Groups • We all favor certain groups over others depending on our interests, values, and attitudes • In-Group • A social group that commands a member’s esteem and loyalty • Members generally hold overly positive views of themselves and unfairly negative views of various out-groups • Out-Group • A social group which one feels competition, opposition or antagonism towards
In-Groups and Out-Groups • Being a member of a group can generate not only a sense of belonging, but loyalty and a sense of superiority • This can lead to rivalries with other groups • Identification with groups can lead to ethnic, racial, and gender divisions • We develop a biased perception that leads to a “double standard” • We see the traits of our in-group as virtues while we see those same traits in out-groups as vices • A sex crazed man is seen as a “stud” while a sex crazed woman is seen as a “slut”
In-Groups and Out-Groups • Such divisions can lead to violence • For example, members of the Ku Klux Klan beating a black man to death for looking at a white woman the wrong way • Economic and political changes can strengthen these divisions • In times of economic recession or depression, we tend to find a “scapegoat” to blame for our troubles
Reference Groups • Reference Group • This is a social group that serves as a point of reference in making evaluations and decisions, especially about ourselves • Can be either primary or secondary groups • Our psychological need to conform means that these reference groups can affect our behaviors, attitudes, and values
Reference Groups • They provide a yardstick to measure ourselves up to • If we want to achieve a certain status held by a group, we change our looks, attitudes, and behaviors to help us get that status • If we feel that we measure up to the standards of the reference group we feel no conflict • If we feel that we do not measure up to these standards this can lead to inner turmoil
Social Network • Social Network • A web of social ties • Includes family, friends, friends of friends, etc. • They tend to be weak ties, most of them include people we “know of” or people who “know of us” • Networks are based on interests, status, wealth, prestige, and even gender • For example, women include more relatives and women in their networks, while men include more co-workers and men
“Six Degrees of Separation” • In 1967, Stanley Milgram did a study called the “small world phenomenon” • He suggested any two people in the U.S. were connected on average by a chain of six acquaintances • He sent 60 letters to various people in Nebraska who were asked to forward the letter to a certain stockbroker living in Massachusetts • The participants were required to pass the letters only by hand to personal acquaintances who they thought might be able to reach the target
“Six Degrees of Separation” • Milgram claimed success since some of the letters actually were received by the intended recipient • However, when the study was looked at more closely, only 5% of the letters actually reached its destination • When the experiment was reproduced, only a very small percentage reached the destination • It was not actually a “small world” as Milgram implied
Formal Organizations • Formal Organizations • These are large secondary groups that are organized to achieve their goals efficiently • They do so by being impersonal and have a planned atmosphere • We rely on formal organizations everyday from schools to mail delivery • They develop their own cultures that perpetuate even as workers come and go
Formal Organizations • There are three types of formal organizations based on the reasons why people participate in them • Normative Organizations • Coercive Organizations • Utilitarian Organizations
Formal Organizations • Normative Organization • This is an organization that is not monetarily rewarding but is personally satisfying, morally worthwhile and/or socially prestigious • Examples • Volunteer Organizations – PTA, Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders • Political Parties • Religious Organizations
Formal Organizations • Coercive Organization • This type of organization forces members to join as a form of punishment or treatment • Includes mental hospitals and prisons • The members are separated as “inmates” or “patients” for a period of time and designed to radically alter their attitudes and behaviors
Formal Organizations • Utilitarian Organization • This type of organization offers people a source of income • It grants more individual freedom than coercive organization but less than normative ones • Most people are required to spend most of their days working for this type of organization
Formal Organizations • An organization can fit into one, two, or all three types at once • For example a mental hospital fits into all three types: • It is a normative organization to the people who volunteer there • It is a coercive organization to the patients • It is a utilitarian organization to the people who work there
Bureaucracy • Bureaucracy • A bureaucracy is a formal organizational model rationally designed to perform tasks efficiently • Max Weber was the one who noted that during the Industrial Revolution there was a shift to achieve more efficient results • There was a shift from personal loyalties to the “bottom line.” • With this shift there was the development of the bureaucracy • Formal organizations have been around since the dawn of civilization
Development of Bureaucracy • The efficiency of early formal organizations was limited by the traditional character of pre-industrial society • The pre-industrial societies were more traditional, while the industrial societies were more rational • Traditional Character • This is a society (pre-industrial) where sentiments and beliefs about the world passed from generation to generation • Mechanisms of organization are based on tradition • This fuels conservatism, preventing of an organization from being highly efficient
Development of Bureaucracy • Rational Character • This is when a society (industrial) has the deliberate, matter-of-fact calculation of the most efficient means to accomplish a particular task • Rationality pays little attention to the past and is open up to change in whatever way seems likely to get the job done better or more quickly
Development of Bureaucracy • Rationalization • This is the change from tradition to rationality as the dominant mode of human character • Modern society becomes “disenchanted” as sentimental and traditional ties give way to a rational focus on science • This is when we see the rise of a bureaucracy as the most efficient form of organization
Characteristics of Bureaucracy • According to Weber, there are certain characteristics to a bureaucracy • Clear levels, with assignments flowing downward and accountability flowing upward • A division of labor • Written rules • Written communication and records • Impersonality and replaceability
Problems With Bureaucracies • While bureaucracies are highly efficient, they can also be dysfunctional • Bureaucratic Ritualism • This is the preoccupation of the workers with rules and regulations to the point of that they become inefficient • “Red Tape” • This concept comes from the red tape used in 18th century English administration practice of wrapping official packages and records in red tape
Problems With Bureaucracies • Bureaucratic Alienation • Bureaucracy has the potential to dehumanize the people who work in it and the people its suppose to serve • Workers are alienated in that they feel more like objects rather than workers • Due to all the rules, regulations, and assigned functions • Weber said that in a bureaucracy a human being is reduced to a “small cog in a ceaselessly moving mechanism.”
Problems With Bureaucracies • Workers usually fight this alienation • Do so by informally gathering during work or after and by adding personal touches to their work space • Clients feel alienated • Due to the impersonality the bureaucracies encourage which keeps officials and clients from responding to each other’s unique, personal needs • Bureaucratic Inertia • This refers to the tendency of bureaucratic organizations to perpetuate themselves
Problems With Bureaucracies • Bureaucracies are a powerful motivation tool because they harness people’s energies to reach a specific goal but what happens when that goal is reached? • Usually what the officials do is change their focus to achieve a new goal • Why waste a perfectly good bureaucracy? • Examples of bureaucracies that changed: • March of Dimes – Originally designed to find a cure for polio and now it works on preventing birth defects • NATO – Originally designed to help the west protect itself against the Soviet Union and now Russia is a member • U.S. Department of Agriculture – Originally designed to help farmers but now works on environmental and nutritional research
Problems With Bureaucracies • Oligarchy • This is the rule of the many by the few • “Iron Law of Oligarchy” • The pyramid shape of the bureaucracy places a few leaders in charge of vast resources • Weber connected a strict hierarchy of responsibility with increasing organizational efficiency which is why this is seen in a bureaucracy
Problems With Bureaucracies • Unfortunately, hierarchy also undermines democracy • To promote their own personal interests, officials can and do use their access to resources, information, and the media • This it undermines people’s control over their leaders especially since oligarchy thrives in the hierarchical structure of bureaucracy • In the U.S. we have term limits, a system of checks and balances, and competition which prevents our government from becoming an out-and-out oligarchy • However, incumbents do enjoy a significant advantage in U.S. politics
Problems With Bureaucracies • Parkinson’s Law - C. Northcote Parkinson (1957) • This states that “work expands to fill the time available for its completion” • This means that if a full day is available to complete the work, a full day is how long it will take • Rather than look for extra work, bureaucrats are going to try look busy • This makes the organization to think its busy and thus takes on more employees
Problems With Bureaucracies • Peter Principle – Laurence J. Peter (1969) • States that “bureaucrats are promoted to their level of incompetence” • Employees who are competent at one level of the hierarchy will be promoted to higher positions • Eventually, they reach a position where they are no longer competent and they perform poorly and become ineligible for further advancement • By reaching their “level of incompetence,” they will have a future of inefficiency • On top of this, by being in the organization for so long, they have learned how to hide their incompetency and take credit from those underneath them
Working for the Corporation • Every formal organization develops their own culture • Corporate Culture • The orientations that characterize corporate work settings • It contains hidden values which create a self-fulfilling prophecy that affects corporate careers
Working for the Corporation • Bosses tend to have a stereotype of what good workers are like and promote people based on this • “The Good Workers” • The bosses feel that they are one of the good workers and will look for people who are like them • They are given more opportunities, networking, and put into “fast-track” positions • In turn, they perform better and are more committed, thus fulfilling the prophecy
Working for the Corporation • The “Bad Workers” • These are the workers whose initial expectations are held low • They are not given full access to information or opportunities • Thus, they tend to work at a level below their capacity and see themselves in poor light, leading to poor job performance • This confirms the original stereotypes placed on them • Women and minorities are usually put in this negative stereotype • Thus, they are not put in positions of power • Instead they are put in “showcase” positions which are highly visible but do not have any power • Even though corporations are becoming more diversified, it will take a long time for this corporate culture to give way
U.S. and Japanese Corporations • Japanese society contain a culture of strong collective identity and solidarity, and this can be found in their corporations • While the U.S. prizes individualism, the Japanese value cooperation
U.S. and Japanese Corporations • William Ouchi (1981) noted five distinct ways in which U.S. and Japanese corporations differ from each other • Teams are hired right out of college, all with the same starting salaries and responsibilities • They are rotated through the company as a team to learn the various roles • They receive raises and accolades as a team • The workers are loyal to their teams and it becomes like a primary group • It is only until much later that single individuals are marked for advancement
Hiring and Promotions • U.S. – They value individualism • Individuals are hired based on what they could do for the corporation • Promotions and raises are based on individual competition and is seen as a sign of personal success • Individual’s loyalty is to himself and not to the corporation
Lifetime Security • Japan – Lifetime job security is guaranteed • Employees expect to work for one corporation for their entire lives • They are expected to stick with the company through good times and bad • Workers do not go “job shopping” • When positions become obsolete, the corporation will retrain the workers for new positions within it
Lifetime Security • U.S. – There is very little lifetime security • The only positions that have tenure are some teaching and judicial positions • Corporations will lay off people in hard economic times, including laying off entire divisions • Workers tend to “job shop” and will move to another company for a better position
Holistic Involvement • Japan – Corporate life is tied into personal life • Both the corporation and the employee are committed for life and do things to help each other • The employee works long hours and is loyal to the corporation while the latter provides lifetime security, health services, social events, and home mortgages • Employee involvement continues outside the office where co-workers socialize
Holistic Involvement • U.S. – Work stays at work • Work is considered a temporary contract: when the work is done, the employee leaves • After-work hours are the private time of the employee • The workplace and the home are very distinct and there is no mingling
Broad Training • Japan – Workers are trained in all aspects of the corporation • Employees move from one job to another within the corporation to get a better idea of how it works • They are trained in all aspects of it, keeping in mind that the employee will remain with the company for life
Broad Training • U.S. – We focus on one job • Workers are highly specialized and tend to spend their entire lives doing one job • When a worker does well at a job, they are promoted to another with more responsibilities • Their view of the corporation is limited to their little niche in it
Collective Decision Making • Japan • Lengthy decision process involving all those who are affected • There is much discussion and a consensus is reached regarding what is best • U.S. • The decisions are made by key executives • The only people consulted may be a small group around the executives and possibly in the department being affected