1 / 29

The 2011 Groundhog Day Blizzard: A Synoptic and Mesoscale overview

Stephen Rodriguez, Jr. National Weather Service Chicago, IL. The 2011 Groundhog Day Blizzard: A Synoptic and Mesoscale overview. Introduction. Brief background. Purpose of Study. Synoptic background and forcing mechanisms. Synoptic/ Mesoscale features: Moisture, Forcing, Instability.

mabli
Download Presentation

The 2011 Groundhog Day Blizzard: A Synoptic and Mesoscale overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stephen Rodriguez, Jr. National Weather Service Chicago, IL The 2011 Groundhog Day Blizzard: A Synoptic and Mesoscale overview

  2. Introduction • Brief background. • Purpose of Study. • Synoptic background and forcing mechanisms. • Synoptic/Mesoscale features: Moisture, Forcing, Instability. • Conclusions.

  3. Radar Storm Evolution

  4. Observed Snowfall Totals CHICAGO

  5. Wind Gusts/Visbys/Lightning 65 STRIKES! 1/4 MILE VISBYS.

  6. Purpose of Study • Synoptic/Mesoscale Overview. • Pattern Recognition/Conceptual Models. • “How to Forecast” Blizzards? • What are we forecasting?

  7. Purpose - NWS Blizzard Definition • Sustained wind or frequent gusts to 35 miles an hour or greater; and • Considerable falling and/or blowing snow (i.e., reducing visibility frequently to less than ¼ mile). • For a period of 3 hours or longer.

  8. Purpose - Blizzard Elements • Heavy snowfall. • Snow efficiency. • Strong winds.

  9. Synoptic Overview 300 MB 02/02/11 00Z

  10. Synoptic Overview 700 MB 02/02/11 00Z

  11. Synoptic Overview 850 MB 02/02/11 00Z

  12. Synoptic Overview SFC 02/02/11 00Z

  13. Synoptic Overview 02/02/00 00Z ROAB KDVN

  14. Low/Isallobaric Component 00Z 03Z 06Z

  15. Well-Mixed Environment 04Z RUC Sounding

  16. Moisture 850 MB Moisture Transport

  17. Moisture TROWAL structure identifiable by 02Z-3Z. CHICAGO

  18. Forcing - Deformation

  19. Forcing - Isentropic Lift 22Z/00Z/02Z RUC 290K CHICAGO Persistent isentropic lift from late afternoon through late evening.

  20. Forcing - Frontogenesis RUC 02Z MSN ORD EVV

  21. Instability - EPV RUC 02Z MSN ORD EVV

  22. Instability – CAPE/Lapse Rates NORTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS 04Z RUC Sounding

  23. Snow Efficiency NORTH CENTRAL ILLINOIS 00Z-03Z

  24. Conclusions - Review • Copious amounts of moisture. • Persistent strong forcing due to both synoptic/meso forcing mechanisms. • Instability – an added benefit. • Snow efficiency.

  25. Conclusions – Key Factors • Heavy Snowfall – Yes! • Snow efficiency – Yes! • Strong winds – Yes! Yes! Yes!!!

  26. Blizzard Climatology

  27. Conclusions – Lessons Learned • Stick to “base” data. • Pattern Recognition of three elements. • All come together – Blizzard.

  28. Questions? • References: • NOAA/NWS/Storm Prediction Center • Schwartz, 2001.

More Related